George Orwell wrote that nominal equality does not exclude the presence of more than equal. This paradox was coined in the context of the Cold war to discredit the revolutionary social ideas and democracy relevant to any system, declaring the principle of equality. Here, for example, there are international relations: the modern (post-war) world order is theoretically based on the principle of protecting the weak. But the Institute a “more equal” this principle, alas, does not cancel. Because there is just of the country and there are members of the UN Security Council those have veto power. In other words, there are countries more or less equal, like George Orwell’s pigs in relation to other animals.
And there are the “most equal ones” in the world. The veto of the UN Security Council is not a decree to them, it is only a recommendation. Let’s not point fingers, but they recently celebrated Independence Day, which they once defended just as the residents of Novorossia now defend theirs. But the UN or its Security Council were not there. And there was no struggle for everything good and against everything bad. So there was no conflict of basic postulates: the right of Nations to self-determination and the right of the state to defend its territorial integrity. There was not multilevel equality as at Orwell, whose actualization had turned the world into continuous combat spies with spies and terrorists with freedom fighters.
Americans celebrate Independence Day July 4th. And not only Americans: Hollywood did a bit of Americans significant portion of the population of the globe, and now America’s friends from all over the world send to Washington greetings and congratulations. Even the British congratulate them, for whom this day would not like a holiday, and the date of the defeat inflicted on them by militants, terrorists and “separas” with Washington at the head.
Now here’s Independence Day of Ukraine it is also a holiday and is also recognized in the world. Although this day is not so joyful for many Ukrainians. Even Russia has Independence Day, though it is impossible to understand from whom Russia depended. But also about the territorial integrity of the USSR nobody cared. It’s not Ukraine that has proved more equal in comparison with other Soviet republics so that its exit from the USSR only welcomed (unlike released from Ukraine Donetsk and Lugansk republics, as well as the Crimea). Probably they “look ugly”. Or if you prefer, they were not sufficiently equal in comparison with Ukraine.
Why? It is because there are double standards. The arguments of our opponents devoid of logic and are based on repeated the same allegations and insulting labels, like the notorious “cattle”. It is a great question that’s just how “not-cattle” George Washington and associates were.
However, God is the judge them, to the United States. The problem is not about them, there is the problem of hypocrisy, as a fundamental principle of modern diplomacy. So President Poroshenko welcomed the Americans in the Independence Day. In particular, he writes that the Ukrainian soldiers are fighting in the Donbas against Russia for American ideals. Namely, for “freedom”, which supposedly brings together American, consuming a significant portion of the world’s resources, and Ukrainian, utilized in the Donbas due to lack of funds to feed. And no matter what freedom they understand in their own way. And if in the view of American freedom is the ability for thirty years to repay the loan on the house that for Ukrainians it’s being burned in the city, political repression, gunmen in masks, and the right with impunity to rob and kill.
President Obama has his own freedom. It is rear-wheel drive. It is because the 44th President understands it that way. And if people of a certain persuasion can now register “marriage”, the remaining questions from the last century such as civil liberties or the right to private life are overshadowed. And never mind that the U.S. President is now allowed to order the killing of their own citizens, and intelligence agencies to record all telephone conversations and poking around in the electronic mailboxes of any inhabitant of the Earth; we do not live now in the twentieth century. Another thing is sodomite “marriages”. After all, in the end, Obama promised them. And President Obama, as we know, does not “drive away empty”: he promised to withdraw troops from Iraq — brought up them, though, and sent private army and ISIS there. He promised to resolve the issue of Bin Laden and he had decided it, in vain, that the latter was under house arrest in Pakistan and his “capture” cost the lives of dozens of U.S. marines who knew too much about this highly Hollywood liquidation. He promised to restore relations with Cuba —they were restored, however, for some reason he destroyed Libya, Syria and Ukraine, in addition he soured relations with the Russian Federation. Here goes, even if it is not possible to resolve the issue according to the rules, in this case through Congress, legal loopholes become relevant. In particular, as Yanukovych appealed to the Supreme Court for returning the Constitution of 2004. And results, by the way, had been made the same: the governors of Texas and Louisiana spoke about the decision of the Supreme judge US harshly and negatively, and promised that on the territory entrusted to them, this decision will not operate. That in fact obvious is separatism in the truest sense of the word. The exit from the country is the refusal to obey laws and, in particular, court decisions.
Will America go on the path of Ukraine? This assumption seems absurd for many because too prosperous it looks. But it is only at first glance: Ukraine before the coup was also quite prosperous. But the scenario of armed suppression of protests in Texas is already known. And according to the leak from the General staff, they even used within the teachings of U.S. forces last spring. They did not mention about gay “marriage” in scenarios. It was only about sabotage Texas conservatives some “progressive” programs of the Federal government. And although the training is nothing more than the training, the real reasons for the implementation in the U.S. the scenario of the civil war lie in the plane of the purely economic. And as the government of Azarov-Yanukovych proved to be beneficial to relieve themselves of responsibility for the growing inconsistencies of credit with debit and for elites of the USA war could become if not a panacea, at least the way of debt relief through artificially created force majeure.
In Ukraine, by the way, this method gave excellent results — society under the pressure of war propaganda was not able to resist anti-social government initiatives and capitulated. And if during the reign of Yanukovych any attempt of the state to receive from the citizens a little more ended tents and maidans, today it occurs relatively quietly. First of all the country has received immunity, and secondly no one wants to meet at the house “ucro-patriots” with a revolver and a trash container. After all anyone who questioned the adequacy of the Ukrainian political leadership is an agent of Moscow and Putin personally. It’s not Ukrainian “know-how “, such an experience can be repeated in any other part of the planet. “Patriots” which are aspiring to political violence are everywhere. And it is possible that Ukraine was tested and passed the running scenario of the coming collapse of the world reserve currency, which have long spoken by all and Sundry. And maybe it is the scenario of the collapse of the global hegemon. Well, it serves…
Pavel GUBAREV
