Chief Editor of “New Land” Artem Olhin in his article raises a critical topic that interests many people today. What will happen next in Ukraine? If you want to get the answer – look at what happened in countries where there were violent change of power. There was always the same. Moderates are always replaced by radicals, which then are unanimously slaughtered. Last summer we have predicted such prospects for Ukraine.

“Before the foundation … And then?

The day will come when the building of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine will be turned into a Museum. And it would be carved in stone the saying of Vasiliy Osipovich Klyuchevsky above the entrance: “History teaches nothing, only punishes for ignorance of lessons.” He is also credited the phrase “History only teaches us that it teaches nothing” — is also a good illustration. Well, in fact, would people go to Maidan if they didn’t have the illusion that it is they, it is here and now for the first time are doing unprecedented things? Would Yarosh, for example, take responsibility for all the excesses of the “Right sector”, if he seriously treated the phrase “Revolution devours its children”?

Souvenir jail

The author of the aphorism about a bloodthirsty revolution, the Jacobin Georges Jacques Danton, spoke it directly on the way to the guillotine. It is also instructive fact, but so it was remained without attention. Although, it would seem, it is written in all textbooks and reference books. But, apparently, the time is such – to read not fashionable. Remembering the faces of my students while exploring the theme of revolution, which is called “the French”, I can state that this left them disinterested. Comrades in stockings and wigs seemed to them as the useless past. Meanwhile, the experience of “comrades” have since repeated many times, in the light of what is interesting – how sees his future at least Yatsenyuk? After all, the parallel between the current Ukrainian “freedom fighters” and the French Girondins, which overthrew the king, and thereafter were destroyed in an inter-party fight, is obvious.

In general, “the French revolution”, is perhaps the best visual aid for modeling of all social conflicts that have arisen in modern and contemporary times. Only the terms defined details associated with the specifics of time and place of event may be differ. But the overall dynamics remains the same. Let’s see: the reason for the start of the unrest in France was the economic crisis. Or rather, it was not even a crisis, and claims on the part of French elites to the king. Now these things would be called “corruption”. And, of course, they would go out to the Maidan. Similarly, the French did. One of the main symbols of the “great revolution” was the storming of the Bastille – the place of confinement of state prisoners. It turns out that this building had a direct connection with the “bloody regime”, was its symbol. The same stand in awe of last year’s activists of the “Maidan” should probably cause the events associated with the “storm” of the President’s administration (do you remember the footage with the tractor traveling on the “Berkut”?) Now, in the heat of the storm, few people noticed that the prisoners of the then Royal «bloody regime» were less than ten. Two of them were mad, four sat for fake bills. Another “prisoner of conscience” was arrested for sexual crimes. But during the storm people were killed much more — different sources give from 30 to 100 people dead. The head of the commandant of the Bastille was impaled on a spike and was carried around Paris symbolizing the overthrow of “oppressive regime”. We conclude – the symbolism, the element of theater in any revolution – is a thing supremely important and necessary. Without it you cannot anywhere. However, the pathos of this always disappears quickly. But the hangover remains for a long time. The prison, which symbolized tyranny, it was decided to disassemble. Even fashion appeared – small models of the fortress were made from bricks of the Bastille and sold as souvenirs. As if they subconsciously emphasized that all of this is not fully true, it’s a game. Games are different: ISIS, for example, arranges performances by beheadings or firing of “infidels”. And it is also the creation of the character. You might even say it is a performance.

How the flywheel works

In principle, a mechanism called “revolution” always works about the same. First, soil is created, certain ideas are thrown and a concept that, at first, “theoretically”, it turns out that you can do more than what was allowed before. And – voila: the absolute monarchy transformed into a constitutional, and a little later you can already decapitate former king. In France, the enlightenment figures were engaged in such work.

Voltaire and Montesquieu wrote works about “enlightened monarchy”, this, existing, like not criticizing, but if it was “enlightened”… Diderot creates encyclopedia, which states that lightning is just electrical discharge, and not the wrath of God. This means that the God is in question. This means and the power of the monarch are not from the Lord. And at leisure Diderot wrote fiction. For example, he wrote about a nun which was in the monastery not by choice and was contained in fact in prison. Rousseau directly, without any equivocation, offered new, “untested” ideas. So, the concept of the social contract is still lying at the foundation of Western society. What it was possible to “negotiate” — we can see with our own eyes. In France the most conservative part of society is already crying just from the “universal values”. While their roots back to that era, in which in place of the Bastille they wrote: “Here are dancing”. However, the figures remain classics of the enlightenment, the undisputed authority until now.

Modern Ukrainian nationalism also has its own soil, and it was created so long since the nineteenth century. And in the end it turned out that in Odessa they burned not the Russian people, but “females of Coloradas”, in the Donbass live alone bandits, and contrary to this — “we are not cattle”. This explains and justifies everything. But for how long is it? How many representatives of the French elite inspired by the “educators” regretted their historic selection as a result?

Now, after creating of “fertile ground” a reason is modeled. Lately they are boring and monotonous, usually based on the economy, rather than on who and what received less from-for “mode”. The French king also brought together the elite in order to discuss the tax increase. Was it right? It’s hardly. But the result of the protest exceeded all expectations. Similarly, the modern Ukrainians, probably, have not once regretted the exile of “bloody Yanukovych”. But all is irreversibly.

And then the real fun begins: it’s the visible part of the revolution. And it also has two established process, which are following each other. And this mechanism is almost never crashes. First, in order not to shock “the masses”, the authorities overthrew the moderate opposition. We have seen different options, from quite secular liberals in 1917 to the Muslim opposition in Egypt. And then it is replaced by a more radical party. And already it will perform all the tasks laid down in the revolution. So in France the Jacobins overthrew the Girondins and put them under the knife of the guillotine. And if “moderate” Girondins changed only system of weights and measures, the Jacobins reached for the calendar. And in addition they put on the brink of banning the Catholic Church and introduced the “Cult of reason”. And, of course, they began to destroy each other. Almost without exception, all “children” of the revolution had been eaten by their mother. Probably, and Francisco Goya, who lived in the “revolutionary” period, felt these currents. He felt and reflected in the form of a creepy painting “Saturn is devouring his son”. And, finally, it is the natural ending: any revolution always ends with a “Thermidor” — removing the annoying radicals. As a rule, they repeat the same path that sent their opponents, that is, physically destroyed. After eating their fill of the revolution, the French applauded Napoleon and his Empire. Running away from Russia Trotsky (the more Robespierre) reproached Stalin in the “Thermidor”. And this is true, and thank God that Stalin was in his place. The Egyptians with a sigh of relief escaped from the “Muslim brotherhood”. And only Ukrainians still think that the laws of revolutionary development of the genre will not affect them. But the process has obviously gone.

What will the future bring?

In modern Ukrainian the scheme, everything is pretty clear: the “moderate” part of the junta one way or another will be eliminated. What would be the reason for this, as will be the force that it will make and in what time frame it will happen – until the matter. But in the algorithm you can be sure at 99%.

It is another important point – when the time is right to return to the model of strong leadership as always it will be that in Ukraine there is no one real to use. And, once again it will fall into the hands of Russia, weakened from “independence”. It will be with all their turmoil and their newly gained problems with war, it is likely. Maybe it will fall not in one piece, and in parts, but so, too, has already happened in history.

This material is deliberately not containing a single line about the Freemasons, conspiracies and other things behind the scenes. It’s not because the author is not familiar with conspiracy calculations, opposite. Just since we’re talking about laws, here’s one for starters: through all the intrigues and conspiracies (like the betrayal of 1991, at least) Russia has always held strong and entered the international arena updated, decent country. It will be so this time.

Here is not France for you.

Everything will be Russia.

Artem OLHIN.

The hottest point on the world map today – is Syria. Literally it decides the fate of the planet. And the main role is played by Russia, which recently appeared to the West, was dropped from the chessboard. We see the situation in Syria through the eyes of our Russian journalists, and to some it may seem like a biased point of view. But recently Syria was visited by foreign correspondents and one of them is an Italian political scientist and journalist Giulietto Chiesa.

“TOMORROW.” Mr. Chiesa, you recently visited Syria at the Russian aerospace defense forces. And what was the reason of your visit to Syria?

Giulietto CHIESA. I was looking chance to visit a military airfield Hamim in the Syrian Latakia. And here I received an invitation from the Ministry of defense to visit this base, so that we had a coincidence of interests: and my personal, and the Ministry of defense of the Russian Federation. I wanted to see the real scope of the operation in Syria. I wanted to look closer, what forces Russia has there and what technologies, what methods are used in this operation. Of course, I travel with a clear idea of what is happening there, it was the understanding of the political and strategic importance of this operation.

It should be noted that the organization of the trip was brilliant. Access to information within reasonable limits was wide. We saw a lot.

Of course, it was not possible to talk with the pilots. Because of it is a safety issue. But we are given extensive information about the operation. We saw near the aircraft movement. We were told how they select targets, how they interact with the Syrian army. There was a press conference with one of the leaders, the General, who explained the operation, answered the questions.

Russia performs its functions in accordance with the agreement with the Syrian government. Essentially, what we have seen shows the extreme intensity of this operation. During the day dozens of flights back and forth: 24 hours, around the clock, your aircrafts lifted into the air.

And at the same time, we saw how complicated this operation is from the standpoint of the safety of your troops. After all, the front line there is quite conditional, mottled. It is very difficult to identify where the terrorists, if not a very clear organization of information gathering. And this collection is carried out using technical instruments, which are in the possession of the Russian army and secret services, and security services of Syria.

It was interesting to look at the entire chain and system of measures. Because many people think that it is enough to come there, to deliver the aircraft to the runway and fly. But it is extremely difficult to ensure safety. This is a complex operation, which, in my opinion, gives a clear picture of the technological level of the Russian army. I’ve seen your military in action. In Soviet times, many times I was in Afghanistan, then saw, unfortunately, and the Chechen war. And from the point of view of organization, responsibilities and procedures all this is incomparable with what it was previously. Of course, it’s a completely different army. Obviously, the Russian leadership and Putin personally in the past decade have paid special attention to the army and its equipment, training.

“TOMORROW.” European leaders don’t really see who is the terrorist and who is a fighter against terror, or don’t they want to see?

Giulietto CHIESA. It’s just Comedy. They pretend that they are doing one thing though, what the situation is. The only thing that can be a little whitewashes their clothes is that they really don’t know what is going on out there on the battlefield; they may not be given real information. Mr. Obama is given probably false information.

And all this talks about moderate terrorists, the moderate opposition are complete fiction, hypocritical statements that are completely untrue.

Now a few specific groups that previously fought against the government of Syria, after the bombing by the Russian ASF, changed the views, positions, and are cooperating, are going on the interaction.

But it is important to understand that everyone plays his game. And not only great powers like the USA, Turkey, Israel and Saudi Arabia. On the battlefield there are leaders, groups that play themselves. Because the situation has changed after the intervention of Russia, obviously, to choose their allies are now different. Seeing that Bashar Assad will not fall, and Syria will not be broken, they look at Syria as a possible political ally, so begin to cooperate with Russian military…

“TOMORROW.” Have you thought that the talks on Syria will actually take place? Or knew interested third parties will find an excuse to undermine them?

Giulietto CHIESA. I think that in this company the Western coalition there are several forces that do not want any negotiations. I think even the United States is playing a double game: Obama says one thing and his staff at the Pentagon and the CIA do different. It is difficult to understand, but definitely there are forces that don’t want any reconciliation. Turkey is among these forces. Therefore, large-scale negotiations are unlikely to take place. At least, large-scale negotiations are unlikely to be held now, where all the participants of this process will actually be discussing a truce.

I heard an interview with your Minister of foreign Affairs Sergey Lavrov, who said that now is not the time to end of Russian operations, “we come in this operation to the end.” So, they will clean Syrian battlefield. Why did the Minister say that? Because in the West there are rumors that Russia here-here, in a couple of weeks to complete the whole operation comes out…

And they expect that then you will be able to put Assad on his knees. That’s the calculation. They think that Russia cannot long to conduct military operations in Syria. So they are looking for it — Russia’s withdrawal from Syria. And tactics will be as follows: to delay negotiations as much as possible. But the fact is that Russia is, on the battlefield, dealing heavy blows. And there is a risk that Russia alone will break the resistance. And then they will look weak in the negotiations which have still to begin. Delaying negotiations is a tactical operation that some participants in this process is carried out to gain time and positions on the field. But it all depends on the financing that these “opposition forces” receive from the West and from Turkey. Without support they would not have been able to make anything. Today I do not see the real beginning of the peace talks, they will not be.

“TOMORROW.” Are you an optimist or a pessimist about the operations in Syria?

Giulietto CHIESA. It’s hard to say. I believe that at present the initiative is in the hands of Russia and Bashar al-Assad. If the Syrian army will continue the offensive against terrorists, soon they will be forced to sit at the negotiating table. This is the situation: the initiative is in the hands of Russia and Assad. But the “opposition” and the forces behind it, looking for excuses for provocations, is absolutely clear that they will implement. And now they are at the stage of preparation of these provocations.

On the tenth of November in the building of the Historical faculty of DonNU was held a Skype lecture with an engineer, journalist, publicist, broadcaster and political consultant Anatoly Wasserman. The theme of the lectures was: “Internationalism and fascism: the lessons of modern conflict.”

“Let’s start with the fact that there are so many strange things due to incorrect use of words. For me, after many refinements, nationalism is a love for own people, and Nazism is the hate of others. Of course, this formulation is generalized and does not claim to be perfect, but our conversation today I would like to keep in line with such understanding of the situation. As Nazism grew out of nationalism, the slave attempts a comprehensive confrontation,” with these words started the speech of Anatoly Wasserman.

It was further discussed about what were the authoritarian regimes of the past and transnational political arrangements, governing nationalist forces today in different countries of the world.
“The United States of America (as “state” in the name of the United States stands for in the first place the word “government” and not familiar to most people-the term “state”) is not beneficial for any other connection States. Now their activities are aimed at splitting the European Union, even though formally they do not talk about. Ukraine is also separated from the rest of Russia, it (Russia – ed.) to weaken. Moreover, in the process, the Europeans and the Americans could turn Ukraine into a market for their products, completely killing the economy in this country. And at the head of the self-liquidation of Ukrainian statehood, as in 2004 and in 2014 were those very nationalists. And we have to understand the processes of both of these revolutions, when it turns out that the main center of Ukrainian nationalism is in Canada”, he continued.

Further Anatoly Aleksandrovich told about the economic differences of internationalism and Nazism.

“Nazism is inevitably always disadvantageous for all Nations. That it always destroys inter-ethnic relations within the state, which bring money to that state. But internationalism is very profitable, only it should not be confused with globalization. If a multinational context strengthens the economy and a number of other aspects of public life, globalization is only trying to lead people to strict standardization and unification. Not leaving any way to change the direction of globalization itself. As for Ukraine, then, according to my information, there now Russian-oriented underground exists. Of course, it is little heard and it seems that it does not exist, but in fact it is. And, perhaps, that soon everyone will be familiar with the results of its activity,” concluded Anatoly Wasserman.

After the lecture, everyone could ask questions on various topics. Mostly asked about the Donbass, the prospects for its joining the Russian state, there were questions about the Syrian issue.
Video from this fellowship will be posted on YIA “Novorossia” in the next few days. Watch our YouTube channel.

Sergey Makedonsky

French social psychologist and sociologist Gustave Le Bon (Gustave Le Bon) wrote his book “Psychology of the masses” in the beginning of the twentieth century, a hundred years ago. But it not only has not lost its relevance, but on the contrary became a kind of starting point for the authors of all known for today technologies of manipulation of public opinion. The authors of the theory of “colored” coups undoubtedly not only were reading of Lebon, but also “creatively reworked”.

This book should be read by everyone.

But we will start the study with several quotes. They clearly show us that the techniques of managing crowds and the whole people as manipulators of Western intelligence agencies invented not by themselves…

Quote 1. “The crowd has never sought for truth; it turns away from the evidence, not pleasing it, and prefers to worship the delusion, if delusion it entices it. Who can enter the crowd astray easily becomes its ruler, who seeks to educate it – he always is a victim of it”.

Kiev. 2013-2014. Maidan. Promises visa-free entry to Europe, a sharp rise of living standards, the elimination of corruption. People want to believe it. Nothing is done – on the contrary, start a civil war and Ukraine’s economy will start moving into the abyss. But people are willing to believe what they like.

Quote 2. “The approval then only has an effect when it is repeated frequently and, if possible, in the same expressions. Think Napoleon said that there was only one noteworthy figure of rhetoric is repetition. Through repetition the idea is instilling in the minds to such an extent firmly that in the end it is accepted as a proven truth.”

And now let us remember a fragment of Russian history. The 2011-2012 year. “The greatest thinker of our time Naval’ny runs “invented” by him the meme “party of crooks and thieves” (PCT). And all this is beginning to repeat: by all the liberals, all Internet resources. Repeat hundreds and thousands of times. All is as Lebone. Nothing is new. Repeat in six months “truth” seems to be proven.

Quote 3. “Constantly reading in the same newspaper, A – is the perfect villain, and B is a very honest person, we eventually become convinced of this, of course, unless you read yet another newspaper, to express quite the opposite opinion. Only the approval and repetition are able to compete with each other, as they have in this case is the same force”.

In the West there is almost no alternative media. In Ukraine first, what did the “revolutionaries” came to power – off the Russian channels. Why? It is an opposing view. Now it is almost there in the West and not at all in Ukraine. Hence there is the belief of the citizens of Ukraine, residents of Donbas fire by themselves.

Quote 4. “The only important changes which dictate the updating of civilizations, committed to the ideas, concepts and beliefs. Major historical events are only visible effects of the invisible changes in people’s minds”.

The one, who generates change in the mind he drives of social processes. And now Ukrainian citizens are told that “then you cannot live so!” Bring to the streets. The results are obvious. But when life has become many times worse – financially and emotionally, no new Maidan does not. Because you first have to change the thoughts and thoughts are controlled by those, who control the media.

Quote 5. “History shows us that once that moral force was based on the civilization lose their power, the case of the final destruction of the unconscious and ends with a rough crowd, justly called barbarians. Civilizations were created and guarded by a small handful of intellectual aristocracy, never by the crowd. Power of the crowd is directed only to destruction. The dominion crowd always points to the phase of barbarism.”

When you see “folk lustration” in Ukraine, or “activists”, blocking the building or institution, remember this quote of a wise Frenchman.

Quote 6. “Control the crowd is not with arguments, but only with the help of samples. In every age there is a small number of individuals, inspires the crowd with its actions, and unconscious mass imitates them.”

In the early twentieth century had not been invented pop and rock music, there was no mass cinema and television, and the principle has already been invented. Need a sample! And why were on Maidan singer Ruslana and other cultural figures?

Quote 7. “Believe in the predominance of the revolutionary instincts of the crowd means that you do not know its psychology. Here introduces us astray only the swiftness of these instincts. Explosions of resentment and desire for resolution are always ephemeral in the crowd. The crowd too is controlled by the unconscious and therefore too subject to the influence of secular heredity, not to be actually extremely conservative. Provided to it, the crowd soon tired of its own unrest, and instinctively tends to slavery.”

This quote explains why after the revolution the regime becomes more tyrannical, and freedom becomes much less.

Quote 8. “The crowd is able to think only by images that are only susceptible to the images. Only images can inspire it to develop in it the horror and become the engines of its actions”.
Images of the crowd and are given. The image of the “beaten students” on the Maidan was one of the catalysts for the growing unrest. The image of the “terrible corruption” stealing money has become common place to create the right mood in the destruction of many states.

Be sure to color in each scenario are given and visualized the image of the “protest”. They are white ribbon, orange color, clenched into a fist. They are given at the time, and preparing ahead of time. For example, “the white ribbon”, a symbol of the never happened “snow revolution” of 2011-2012 was brought by the late Boris Nemtsov from another trip to Washington.

Quote 9. “The power of words is closely related to the resulting images and is totally independent of their real sense. Very often the words with the indefinite sense have the biggest impact on the crowd. These are, for example, the terms “democracy”, “socialism”, “equality”, “freedom”, etc., to such an extent uncertain, even in thick volumes cannot accurately explain”.

Do we need to explain why Western-funded of “revolutionaries” always are fighting “for freedom”, “against corruption” and never for a wage increase for specific %.
And all this has been described even before the First World War…

How to apply to Russia the conservatives and the liberals of the West? What is its role in the world, when even in traditionally Christian countries, like Greece, was adopted the law on the legalization of sodomy? What are your memories of 2015, and what to expect from the 2016? We are talking about it with political scientist and historian Natalia Narochnitskaya.

– Natalia Aleckseevna, what, in your opinion, events were important and memorable in the past year? And why is it?

– For me the highlight under the impression of which I still am, was the action “Immortal regiment”. I was in the March with a portrait of my mother – partisan, next to me was my cousin with a portrait of his father, mother’s sister is his mother; with me was an Englishman with portraits of his uncle and father – one pilot, another served in the Northern Arctic convoy, went Around the French… Around were strangers, with whom we embraced, kissed, danced, and – I don’t remember such feeling of unity and a sort of here is the unity of the nation, which has purely historical experiences. And the French, with whom we then later met in the evening in the cafe, they were just shocked, said: May our rotten press writes anything, today we saw the real Russia, have seen what you will not see in any other Western European country. They were particularly impressed that in the March were mostly young people – from 25 to 45 years old, were walking with children, with strollers. With such young people, in their opinion, Russia will survive everything.

If in such moments the nation is able to throw away all that divides – economic, social, ideological, and single entity, a single choir to perform, it is absolutely invincible. And I had this feeling. In the evening I went through all the Tverskaya. Happy faces, smiles… Strangers spoke to each other: “Congratulations! Happy holidays!” And this extraordinary rise was experienced by people of different social status. In the morning I drove past the Lenin hills, where usually gather auto extreme at the expensive cars. They all gathered with flags and played the national anthem of Russia… This day we will not forget. So everything else for me is of secondary importance.

Of course, we must mention another and a very timely step – demonstration of the national will of Russia in the Syrian crisis. After “Munich speech” of the President in 2007, after recognition of independence of Ossetia and Abkhazia, Russia again declared to the world that it is a sovereign and independent country that it has its own view of the world and the ways of solving the world’s problems that its own interests more important than an approving pat on the back of American “partners”.

But the main thing – is “Immortal regiment”, we experienced the amazing feeling of recovery.

– On December 22, at the plenary session of the Greek Parliament adopted the law on free same sex relationships. Russia, in fact, remains the only Orthodox country where sodomy is unacceptable in principle. What this situation obliges us?

And more than oblige! Russia remains the only country of the Christian world, which openly defends Christian values. It is looked with hope by all the conservatives in Europe – this is confirmed by the article of sociologists, published in such prestigious Newspapers as “Figaro”, for example. By the way, the only greeting to Pope Francis on his election, it was talking about Christianity and Christian values – there was a greeting from President Vladimir Putin. In other said anything: about collaboration, about the harmonization of relations in society, but not about what actually elected Head of the Catholic Church.

– In your opinion, has changed the role of the Church and religion in general in modern society?

– Despite periodic urged by the press scandals, the anti-Church campaign, Church, the polls, remains an institution to which in society the most confidence. And it is very important that trust be maintained. Another thing is that probably ended the period, when the avalanche came to the temple people outside the Church. They came largely out of curiosity and because the Church did not remain. But any introduction to the life of the Church – even a very superficial, as something beautiful and not very clear, leaves in the soul of every person a seed that then can grow. Remember that even a persecutor of Christians, Saul became the Apostle Paul. It is therefore very important to talk to society about the Church. And it is significant that our Church has many young people. I can see that, comparing the situation in other countries.

Today, by the way, conservative organizations began a little louder to assert themselves even in such very atheistic countries, such as France. And anti-Christian message of the French revolution was superior to all other promises, and the extent of the secularism of French society was huge. Now the situation itself, especially with the imposition of the norms of sodomy to society, makes those who cherish traditional values, who cherish Christian values and to act and to do something. Formed even Christian youth movement. Here after known two-million demonstrations against the law on gay marriage held in France, it was even formed several small associations which may be, yet not structured enough, and yet decorated, but it was nothing like this, and now there are. And they look with hope to Russia.

It’s only supporters of the left-liberal, Trotskyist, post-modern ideology see Russia as the enemy. In more conservative circles, the attitude is somewhat different. I just conducted a conference in Germany, which was attended by about a thousand people. On it, by the way, was even the great-great-grandson of Kaiser Wilhelm II – Prince Philip Carl of Prussia, there was a member of the family von Bülow – Chancellor of Germany before the First World War. All said that the only way for Germany to maintain its independence in the international scenario is constructive and good relations with Russia. This is the anchor, the element of balance, which would enable Germany to exercise greater autonomy and to serve their interests and not the interests of the globalist ideology.

– So, the situation is repeated early twentieth century: then, too, Russia was pinned of great hopes…

– In the early twentieth century were attracted by the revolutionary spirit because the revolution promised, above all, social justice. But now the left is fighting for a different spirit. It happened dulling of its blade and its reorientation from the East to the West – as it came from the West to the East, to Russia. But in Russia it is its potential largely exhausted, moved back West, but recoding the main ideas in these free clichés, attached primarily to the values. Advocated freedom from opinions: beauty and ugliness, cacophony and harmony are equalized. But you can walk up to the adjustment of truth and falsehood, good and evil. Actually, this all goes. And conservatives in the West understand it.

– Completes 2015, 2016 is approaching. What all of us – believers, first of all, but unbelievers too – tune, what to be prepared?

– First of all the approaching holiday – Christmas. And Christmas Eve, the holiday itself, followed by the Yuletide is a special mystical weeks, when it’s really waiting for a miracle, waiting for healing, the healing of all afflictions, illnesses – mental and physical. After all these Christmas expectations some changes associated with the celebration of New Year in Soviet times and now people of unbelievers, they are from Christmas. Because when God is with us (although people can be, these words are not pronounce, even mentally), anything is possible, if only we will heed His call to be better and to strive for the ideal. So I want to wish everyone kindness, prosperity, good health in the New Year, the healing of all unhappiness. And will to try it and all who are dear to us, be set up to distinguish between good and evil, truth and lies, beauty and ugliness. I think this is important. And, of course, I want to wish all of simple happiness and joy.

On December 17, the Executive Secretary of the Izborsk club Oleg Rozanov was awarded the national prize of public recognition of the achievements of citizens of the Russian Federation “the Great People of Great Russia”.

The award ceremony was held in the Grand concert hall of the Moscow Government.The staff of the Izborsk club of Novorossia congratulates Oleg Vasil’evich with the highest award, and wishes the further creative successes and achievement of new heights!

On the 15th of December, a famous Russian writer and journalist Zakhar Prilepin met with Donetsk journalists. Editor in chief of the Internet edition “Free press” has shared with colleagues the experience of information warfare.

Prilepin said that the Pro-Western liberal media is quite a serious and strong opponent. In fact, in the information war from the Westerner there is a lot more experience. They act professionally and are able to be convincing enough. They have a lot of first-rate speakers from among the stars and intellectuals. If this simple man cannot always recognize Pro-Western rhetoric.

“They are able to qualitatively and witty talk. They have properly built articulation, well-formed gestures and facial expressions, while there is irony and wit. They are more advanced than we are, and we are very difficult with them in this sense to compete. Therefore, it is necessary to focus on them and try to do better than they are. We must learn to be more relaxed and easier to have our ideas become understandable and accessible to young people,” said Prilepin.

According to him, the main object of information warfare is the youth. It is the youth that determine what should be society in the next few decades. Therefore media reports should be designed primarily at a young audience.

“This is here animal seriousness of patriots – it’s killing us. Don’t need to be so sullen. Act fervently, vigorously, cheerfully. Otherwise, we’ll just uninteresting to young people and will quickly lose them.”

Prilepin noted that it is much harder to fight, because our ideas are not bound by whims and desires, but our goal is to make appealing to the patriotism for the younger generation. Because of the path to victory in this information war lies in the hearts and minds of young people, and nothing else.

Gennady Zhilyakov

Turkish F-16 shot down in Syrian sky Russian SU-24. Our pilot was killed and one marine was killed during the rescue operation. Russian society responded to this explosion by indignation, grief, hatred, desire for revenge. The war in the Middle East, which Russia leads, protective its capricious meandering channel. We started this campaign by air strikes aimed at maintaining of President Bashar al-Assad, the strokes, smashing the divisions of DAYS (the Arab acronym for ISIS) advancing on Damascus.

But the Russian airliner was killed on the Sinai by terrorist attack which hurled the plane to earth. And killing of hundreds of our people have changed the very nature of the campaign. The war has turned now in operation of retribution. Attacks sharply increased and in turn heavy strategic bombers of long-range were introduced. War has turned into a growing, formidable stream of our hatred, will, our desire for revenge.

There was terrorist attack in Paris. Bloody Frenchmen had sent to the coast of Syria their naval group led by the aircraft carrier “Charles de Gaulle” joined in the bombardment of DAYS. And between the Russian and French ships have established the relationship much closer and deeper than simple military cooperation — allied relations. After that, the idea of the coalition, the harmonizing efforts of NATO countries and Russia, has become absolutely up to date. Many countries in Europe reached after the French, wanting to join in a coalition with Russia. But it was a terrible and treacherous act on the border with Turkey. And the idea of the coalition retreated into the background, began to crumble.

What is yet to come? What the new zigzag will the bloody military channel make? The idea of a coalition —is not just military-strategic idea. It was born in the depths of Russian diplomacy, and should provide further easing accumulated over years of conflict between the West and Russia. These contradictions have complicated and exacerbated the whole international process. And there is hope that after the collective war effort in the bowels of this coalition economic, political, cultural, humanitarian discharge will come. The idea of the coalition is extremely expensive as today and tomorrow’s strategic day. Therefore, the conflict with Turkey, most likely, will not be resolved by military retaliation. More and more politicians are saying that the conflict will be mitigated through diplomatic means. To save the coalition would require a complex interaction of our own, Western and Turkish diplomats.

Russia today operates in three hot areas of the world. We are fighting in Syria, wasting large resources. And now we are spending and human’s lives. Kiev is ready to unfreeze the Ukrainian conflict. Already the installation of volley fire covered, pouring Donetsk by shells. Recent terrorist acts have cut off the Crimea from the power supply. We are very anxiously watching Ukraine, which is ready to disregard the Minsk agreements and to begin active operations.

It is no less worrying in the regions of Central Asia. The hordes of armed Islamists are moving from Afghanistan, intending to violate the territorial integrity of Tajikistan and to invade the space of Uzbekistan. And if the Central Asian republics were burn, Russia, related with them by the Treaty of the CSTO, will be forced to intervene.

Three military conflicts – it is very much for Russia. Based on the strategic, military and political expediency, the fourth – the Turkish armed conflict – is excluded. And the more intense our diplomacy seeks allies in the struggle which we are waging in these areas of global peace. Recently, President Putin visited Iran. Within six hours he conducted a private conversation with the spiritual leader of Iran Ayatollah Khamenei. What were they talking about? We can only guess. Apparently, they were talking about the situation in the Middle East.

Because of there are a lot of disappearing right before our eyes state. A new Middle East molded out of this chaos, new territorial Associations created, states of the future. Iran and Russia cannot remain aloof from the construction of a new Middle East. We can’t these geo-strategic changes to be farmed out to NATO members, because the Middle East is the womb of the world, through which important and complex communication path. The oil flow is flowing here. Military conflicts arise. Here, in the Middle East, Judaism, Christianity, Islam were born.

Between Russia and Iran are increasingly close relationship. We are ready to proceed with the construction of the Bushehr nuclear power plant — to build the second, third, and maybe fourth blocks. As it was when we, overcome a lot of technical difficulties, introduced the unfinished by French and the Germans the first block.

We have strengthened our military-technical cooperation with Iran. We began supplying of modern weapons, including high precision, powerful anti-aircraft missiles, which Iran requested before, but only now got Russia’s consent to supply. The military presence of Iran in the Syrian conflict is already evident. On the Syrian theater of operations the Iranian “Guardians of the Islamic revolution” are fighting. We hope that this presence will be enhanced, and the advancing of Syrian army, Iran will be helped.

The killing by Turks of our aircraft brought the memories of the people all of the Russian-Turkish wars: the Balkan campaign, victory of Ushakov and Suvorov against the Turks. Even in my family tradition lives the story of my grandfather, who fought on the Turkish front in the Caucasus, and under the Kars repulsed by direct fire attack of the Turkish infantry, and was awarded the “Golden arms”. And this anger, these secret memories affected by the tragedy codes can’t be answered.

This tragedy we will resolve through diplomatic means. But this does not mean that it will remain unanswered. The Turks should be punished. Turkey and Russia have long been close economic partners. Russia opened its markets to Turkish goods. But now the Turks will have to fight for Russian markets.

The Turks have a lot of internal problems. The Turkish army is restless. Erdogan is swinging on his throne. He has a very difficult political situation. He is too exploded; he was in danger of overthrow. Russia has the means to bring an end of Erdogan. Russia can help the Kurds, long-standing strategic opponents of the colonial Turkey, which dreams of restoring the Ottoman Empire.
Russian policy, the Russian public consciousness, the Russian economy will do everything so that the Turks could teach to test our patience, our will.

The Turks — is not a free civilization. She is part of a huge machine of NATO. Turkey is managed from the United States, in Ankara American residents are sitting. Obama cautiously praised the Russian-Turkish conflict. But the shot of the Turkish plane could not have taken place without the sanction of Americans. When Americans felt that they elude the initiative in the Middle East, that Russia takes the initiative, they had the temptation to stop Russia in its political and military advancement. The sudden turn of Turkish policy, Erdogan’s decision to shoot down our plane is a huge political intrigue aimed against the Russian army, against the Russian policy in the Middle East.

And now the war continues. The tree of war produces new bloody branches, forms a formidable crown of fire. We light candles, praying for our people who lost their lives over the Sinai. We give military honors to the fallen heroes. We pray for our military that are fighting on the far borders of the Russian defense in the Middle East.

Public figure, writer, philosopher and Eurasianist Aleksandr Dugin has always been at the forefront of the sensations of the events happening in the world. In this difficult, full of challenges and questions period, we published an interview with Alexander Gelevich, recorded at the Studio of radio “Komsomolskaya Pravda” immediately after activation “Turkish” factor. Of course, the conversation was not only about it…

Edition YIA “Novorossia”

___________________________________
ABOUT SU-24 SHOT DOWN BY TURKEY

“In the world there is an intense phase of the struggle”

— This is a great event. Because of a great event is open whenever the detection of hidden factors. That is, the world is a pretty intense phase of the struggle, there is a war between unipolar world and the U.S. hegemony against the growing movement towards multipolar one. This, of course, abstract sounds, but this masks the possibility of war, millions of lives. After it there are the redistribution of the enormous financial, diplomatic means, the abolition of boundaries and redistribution of balance.

That’s what the world will be. Will it Western centric, the US-centric, NATO or it will be different because it goes absolutely desperate struggle. And in cases such as Turkish plane, as Ukraine, as the explosion of our plane over Egypt, the bloody formulas makes itself felt precisely this fundamental underpinnings of the modern world, which is in the war of the West against the rest.
“Narrow-minded world where “it’s all right” disappears”

– In Syria, our planes fly at the invitation of the legitimate President. Knock us armed forces of another country, which in Syria were not invited, but who is really present there. Practically it’s a blow to us at our own site. No more, no less. Of course, the Turks can say that it was revenge for the fact that we recently bombed several ISIS bases (prohibited organization in Russia — approx.), supported by the Turkish government. Of course, we can be said that actually our behavior there concedes that America thought about the zone of its national interests. Because America has armed ISIS, it created the ISIS; it uses the ISIS to continue its policies in the Middle East and the redrawing of the borders in this area. Yes, it is. But we begin to call a spade a spade. War is war. In war people die. In war there are victims.

And now, it seems to me, after our plane exploded over the Sinai, after they shot down our pilots today, maybe not in the minds of our political leadership, which understands that long, but in the minds of the townsfolk, if you wish, such tourists, people living in the world, who watch what happens, change the image of the world.

Life was just peaceful, just flew to the resorts of Egypt and Turkey. And suddenly, the foreign Minister said that after this incident, there cannot fly. Just downed an innocent aircraft with our citizens on Sinai is the same shot, and there again, turns out you can’t fly. And this soft travel such a narrow-minded world where everything is in order, where the West will help us, where only there was no war, and terrorists is a local threat that can easily cope, if you behave decently, — the whole world just disappears.

ABOUT THE WAR IN THE WORLD

“War is already underway”

— The peace has ended. We see the brutal and bloody face of war. It is the war, which won’t be, the war which is already underway. It is the war which is quite a large amount of time. If we visit in the Donbas, if we look at the shelling of Donetsk and other cities of the DPR and the LPR those are underway at this time, in this moment, when we see bullets, explosions when we see the bodies, we will become clear that this is not happened today. And when we wonder: Oh, they shut off power supplies to the Crimea. We are fighting essentially. In Ukraine is civil war. We reunited with the Crimea. The Crimea rebelled against the Ukraine, Ukraine and the whole world does not recognize it. We are in the war deep, long and seriously.

“The whole countries drown in the bloody chaos”

— You know, in any war, there are always primary, secondary, and tertiary players. But in fact, the entire configuration is the sum of these forces, of course. If we are talking about the fact that America seeks to maintain its hegemony and the unipolar world and still remains, in general, the most serious and the most major power, fail in their mission to rule the world in its eyes, the exporting is not a right, if it was anything, but just pure chaos, and we see that in this chaos it was impossible in this when American support for the initiative and created bloody chaos drown whole countries – Libya, Iraq, Syria, which are already full just a real bloody meat grinder, if this bloody chaos spills to the streets of Central European cities such as Paris, and what will happen is hard to say.

If the US supports neo-Nazi putsch in Kiev, and the blood is covered the whole East of Ukraine it is already at our borders, in fact it is already very serious. And this is what a real player of this war, which began today, but which, in fact, and is becoming more and more obvious questions. But there are others.

ABOUT THE US

“Islamic state” — it is Freddy Krueger”

— Let’s say what is more important for us that more dangerous for us – Freddy Krueger or Hollywood? When we are dealing with Hollywood, we see a serious cool people, producers who are doing business. When we see Freddy Krueger, we say: Oh, it’s “a Nightmare on Elm Street”. The Islamic state is Freddy Krueger. It’s actually post-modern image, very cruel, very scary. But the same terrible contemporary is postmodern American culture. It is a culture, which disappeared completely the idea of the man. It is a culture of dehumanization.

Actually such projects as ISIS, which is totally artificial project, PR-project, black, monstrous, and similar network clubs of BDSM or snuff show which is actually created by the United States of America. It’s their form of maintaining world domination. Therefore, the claim to these actors, posing even on a serious level of Freddy Krueger performing monstrous acts indicative, present them claim to hate them, it’s still seriously believe that characters in horror films.

“Americans recognize that created ISIS”

— Hillary said that they created ISIS. Americans recognize that ISIS has been created by them. Brzezinski created al-Qaeda. Islamic fundamentalism is the traditional instrument of American geopolitics in the Islamic world. In its time it was directed against Pro-Soviet regimes against the national secular regimes, like the Baathist parties in different countries. And now it simply seeks to continue the escalation of chaos – it is one. For the destruction of national statehood in the Arab world – it is two. And to justify American military presence in the region – it is three. Because of if there is such an obvious monster, then it can be dealt with it.

Accordingly, it is the main actor and the main source of the war that we’re talking about is the United States of America. They wage their war against whom now? Look. Who is on the reverse side? ISIS is their tool. NATO is their instrument. It is their military unit that is not dissolved after we disbanded ours. Erdogan in the extent to which he follows American strategy, is their tool. Actually the only enemy is the West and its hierarchical more and younger, more and more enormous and, at first glance, naughty partners and puppets.

“Outbreaks of common identity immediately choke by American propaganda”

— I am under the sanction of USA. This, by the way, recently someone noticed that this is the only case at all in the world’s history, when the sanctions of a political, legal nature imposed on the intellectual, on a human for his ideas. I am an intellectual. We are dealing with a real world full-fledged ideological dictatorship of the American ideology, liberal ideology, which insists that the interests of the United States is the interest of all progressive humanity, and the interests of the whole of progressive mankind should be the interests of the United States. That is, if you consider yourself a progressive liberal to mankind, you must work for the United States, to execute their orders strictly and always to condemn the one for whom you indicate US. So it is valid.
And now it seems to be Hollande, France, received such a slap from this horrible organization ISIL, which they created to solve their problems, it would seem, needs to take a step in our direction, and instinctively he makes this move because we are struggling with them really in Syria, instead the first reaction is natural, healthy, close to Putin, to support, to send the aircraft carrier “Charles de Gaulle”.

And gradually we see that American advisers on all sides say: no, no, in fact Russia is at war there is no ISIS, Russia supports terrible Assad. Already Manuel Valls says that some of the Russians are to blame for these bloody events of Friday, on November, 13.

By and large, all instantly, even when the outbreaks of some common feelings and common consciousness arise, they would immediately choke on American propaganda. And in our society there is this healthy consciousness, the consciousness that we are at war. Because of it is well, sometimes it comes. You see, if we stick our heads in the sand, it will not escape this danger. Either we want to be a sovereign state, and then we would have to be ready to defend our freedom and independence by any means or simply we need to throw out the white flag and admit that global hegemony. Strictly speaking, if any man is taken from the street, we are not ready neither to that, nor the fact. We are not willing to pay for our sovereignty, we have to fight, and not ready to give up without a fight. And that’s our problem. Who have put us in this state? Those are agents of the US influence working from within our society.

“Any success of any state — it is a challenge to the U.S.”

— You know, the thing is, what if suddenly, somehow, suddenly and unexpectedly, the relations with the U.S. deteriorated, or they showed their aggressive tendencies, then it would be possible to say that a little bit today throws us from one extreme to another; we first thought it was friends, and now realized that they were enemies. In fact, in relations with the US, just from the standpoint of geopolitical basic attitudes can be either open war, or covert. But friendship may not be at all absolutely. Because of this country teaches courses on global domination. Any sovereignty is a barrier. Any success of any nation is based, defending its civilizational identity; this is the challenge of the USA. They declared a zone of national interests all over the globe. So what do we here do, we cute cannot be. So, I had to prepare for war from the beginning.

ABOUT CITIZENS OF RUSSIA

“No longer the resorts”

— They do not open their eyes to the nature of the processes which occur in world politics. They are constantly lying and constantly calm. Constantly hold them. They always say: all right, you go to the resort. Well, they kill our tourists in Egypt, let us to another resort. Now and it is not to this resort. And what resort is now for? And actually, if you explain to these people that haven’t the resorts, that is totally in a different historical phase we are living now, when the issue of Russia’s sovereignty, our freedom and independence once again, as has been many times in history, the First World War, during the invasion of Napoleon’s troops, many historical conflicts, including the Second World War, much is at stake, we would certainly treat our life differently.

ABOUT NUCLEAR WEAPONS

“There are other ways to weaken our sovereignty”

— Nuclear weapons is hard-power, it is a critical component of sovereignty, world politics. But today, in addition to hard-power, there are: hard-power, soft-power still exists and smart-power, such a more flexible. It’s all classical forms of network wars. So really, if they can’t defeat us in a direct nuclear conflict, respectively, there are other ways to weaken our sovereignty, to demobilize our society, to involve in their system. Such processes are in the economy, in culture, in social…

ABOUT EDUCATION

“Try to say about the realism of something in our Moscow State Institute of International Relations”

— Here take MSIIR. This is an institution in which people would have to teach different types of ideas about international politics. Our MSIIR in our society the last decades properly prepare people with the liberal view of international politics as a normative. If you see any other American, European, to a lesser extent, but the American school there talk about liberalism in international politics. This is a half somewhere of course. And the second half is about the realism in international politics where, on the contrary, sovereignty is the main. Try to say about the realism of something in our MSIIR. There are 99% of supporters of liberalism in international relations. Similarly, Moscow state University, where I recently taught, where there is complete disorientation within the world view. I’m not talking about the Higher school of Economics, where just treating the system of education with hatred and contempt for Russia. Soft-power is directed from the inside of our society in order to corrupt entire generations, in order to prepare incompetent professionals, which is at the right moment choose world peace, but not freedom of the state.

ABOUT RUSSIA

“You need to realize the depth and seriousness of war”

— If we stand, then we will certainly be beaten. There is a beautiful saying: if you want peace, prepare for war. The best ally of the state, if it is hard, if it is ready to repel the invasion, this means that any one from the outside will not have the temptation to try what would happen if the invasion happens. If we are going to take blows, if we try to slip away from this confrontation, we did not invent, we impose it and we just need to face the truth: America, in fact, declared war to us. It is willing to tolerate us, if we will be weak, decaying, rotting, decaying and negligible, as in the 90s.

Then they will be, knowing that we can rise again, wait until we’re broke, and lead us, so that we collapsed completely. Or, if we begin to revive, we will impede by any means. So, it is a very different attitude to us, to our society, to our place in the world must gradually form. We have to form national elite, national-minded. It is elite which, in fact, we don’t have today. Because of we have the same elite of 90’s, only viewed from the side. These are the same liberals rebranding themselves. And before that it is rebranding themselves Communists and Komsomol members.
We, in fact, really need to complete some kind of spiritual revolution. We should the national elite to pre-educate, equip. And then the resources that we have, including nuclear resources, economic resources, human, social, historical, political, diplomatic, and these resources are; they will be able rationally to be abandoned to implement the most important objectives facing our country. The main goal is the preservation of the sovereignty, the strengthening and development of our civilizational identity.

And the most important goal and challenge now before us is freedom. Because if we will not be able to defend this freedom, will be with us to do the same as with our tourists on the Sinai, with our pilots who are doing their legitimate duty over Syria. And note, they were not hit by the Syrian rebels that we really are at war, here in war as in war, — they were hit by the Turks, this NATO country, which should theoretically be at war with ISIS, but it is fighting with the Kurds. And ISIS, on the contrary, financed and supported.

And the more largely the military opposition to Assad has evolved through the same Turkey. Accordingly, the conflict here is already out of the premises. It’s not a technical failure. And Ukraine is not a technical failure. And Donbas is not a technical failure. And Syria is not a technical battle. This is a war. First and foremost, in order to, and moreover, in order to win, you must be aware of the depth and seriousness of the war in which we already participate.

ABOUT EUROPE

“Europe tries to hide its head in the sand”

Is completely natural way people who have been in Syria, in Iraq, in Libya, in Yemen, understands what war is. And that this war is near. Those who were in Donbas, it is understood. The war is very close to us. We are in it – whether we like it or not. And, accordingly, either we are aware of. Or we become just objects of the war. Same goes for Europe. Europe tries to hide its head in the sand. Europe is trying to blame everything on technical problems. As suggested by the Europeans to fight terrorism? More freedoms, more democracy, more marches, free love, more immigration, more liberalism and tolerance. It’s even more.

Consequently, there will be more victims, more dead people and more terrorist attacks. That is, they are going to put out the fire by pouring gasoline on it. It’s well. Actually, if we similarly say that it is a technical failure, there’s no problem with pilots is a mistake, now the Turks will help us to find, all forms, and we will again go to rest in Turkey, Egypt will also conduct a sweep of the Sinai, has also go…

ABOUT CHINA

“China has a special path”

Here everything that happens in China, it is a huge work of this billion people, especially its intellectual elite, which is also decent in the leadership of the Communist party. Is maintaining balance – this action is on integration into the world economy, in what areas, in what proportions, at what scale does not violate, but rather strengthens Chinese sovereignty, and to what extent it may entail negative consequences. This filter, this balance is what allowed that are not allowed, in what areas are opened, any are closed, is a special Chinese way.

If we were to move in the same vein, it may be that in some matters we have cooperated with this country, with America, with Europe, with Asia. But all this is not under the auspices of the fact that we are part of a single world system, so there is nothing to fear, we will trade and will never fight, but only in the national interests of Russia. And the fact that this consciousness, realistic consciousness, in the elite, the first and foremost in our economic elite, which operates exclusively in the liberal paradigm, this leads us today, in this difficult moment, depending on our enemies.

ABOUT THE RUSSIAN ELITE

“This elite is not compatible with sovereignty”

— We are not sovereign elite. We have comprador elite. We have elite of band management. Here it nurtured, it turned from elite in the late 90-ies. And that’s how it oversees a number of areas. These elite are not compatible with sovereignty. These elite are integrated into the liberal American ideology. The Bible says: where your treasures are, there your heart will be also. So if you keep your money in the West, if your wealth if your children, wife live in the West, you people of the West, even if you are a Minister in the Russian government or some such dear just official or businessman from Russia.

Similarly, where there is wealth. If wealth is no money, but, for example, the greatness of Russia, loyalty to their own people, the separation of identity with their country and their history, the richness is here. And our heart is here. And then these sovereign elite are. But we don’t. And this is the fifth column. Those people who today, in the conditions of real confrontation,
continue to speak as if nothing had happened, only that we need more trade, that we are part of a global system…

THE POTENTIAL OF THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE

“Our nation will be reborn”

— We do not produce meanings, we don’t even support our Russian meanings more and we will prepare a generation that will become less and less Russian, less and less stored this identity. And yet, our nation is, and how it relates with the understanding, with a deep inner understanding of what is happening in the world today, it refers to the tragic events that more and more often in our lives, shows that we, as a people, have. Yes, we are in a state of Groggy, we are in shock. We repulsed our historical memory, our roots and our traditions.

We are in a state almost, if not direct spiritual occupation is deeply alien to us civilization and their networks. But nevertheless, people are alive. And our identity is alive. You know how easy it is to awaken and how difficult it is to drive in the terrible position in which it is now. Huge forces, global forces, including our fifth and sixth columns are to contain our identity in state, where it is today. But it is necessary to slightly open a small window for breathing, and our nation will be reborn. We have a very strong, great spirit in people’s lives. But it’s already gone underground. Don’t allow it to open up and produce meanings, to return and to assert these meanings.

interviewed by Aleksandr YAKOVLEV

“De-communization” is a process, absolutely devoid of any logic, but the obvious hatred for all Russian things. The historian Artem Olhin commented the next “wave” of bureaucratic zeal in the Donetsk region.

The Chairman of Donetsk regional military-civil administration Pavel Zhebrivsky is going personally to rename streets, squares and the areas in the Donetsk region. “Roll up his sleeves” the official intend, if the leaders do not do this themselves as part of the implementation of the so-called law on de-communization. Zhebrivsky said it at a meeting in the regional state administration.

“November 21 was the deadline allotted to the local councils for de-communization. It’s nowhere to pull over. I’ll give you a month, until December 21, pursuant to this law. After that, I will personally rename streets, squares and the areas, if you do not,” quoted the press service of the Donetsk Municipality, the Military Civil administration of Zhebrivsky.

For the comment about the actions of the Kiev authorities in terms of the so-called “de-communization” the correspondent of “Kharkov” asked the historian, the chief editor of the journal of the Izborsk club of Novorossia “New Earth” Artem Olhin.

According to Olhin, to speak of “de-communization” of Donbas without unnecessary emotions and words “with bright expressive color” is very difficult.

“First of all, because of it’s a process that’s completely devoid of any logic, but the obvious hatred for all Russian things. And since 99% of the cities of Novorossia, or, as they say now, “the South-East of Ukraine” the history of their fully required either Imperial or Soviet period, it means that as a result of it they have to hate themselves and their cities. And this, as far as I understand, is very difficult and destructive for the psyche,” said the historian.

Allchin stresses that the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic was created on the instructions of V. I. Lenin, who included the Donbas in it.

“So, when else in the 2014 year “Lenin-falls” began I, as a historian, could not understand – why is such hatred? This is because Vladimir Ulyanov created a separate USSR and forced the Donbas to enter in it. And not all wanted it, by the way, administrative struggle continued until 1924. That we are supposed to have hostile attitude to Lenin, but it’s a paradox. Instead, we protect and its monuments and the General historical memory,” emphasizes Artem Olkhin.

Artem Olhin said that not all monuments of Soviet times were destroyed by the Kiev authorities.

“By the way, in some junta-occupied cities of Donbas Soviet monuments were relatively lucky. So in Volnovakha Chapaev was transformed suddenly into a “Cossack”, in Severodonetsk fighters of the Great Patriotic became “warriors of the UPA”. In most cases the sentence was harsh and unforgiving: dismantling, produced in a climate of mindless celebration. But it’s not terrible. Just because the Ukrainians Bandera format is based on pure hatred, it cannot stand as a long-term project,” said the chief editor of the journal of the Izborsk club of Novorossia “New Earth”.

The feature of this mode is that destroying someone else’s, the Kiev authorities do not create anything of their own, acting like minions.

“And nothing will help: how many monuments take down, how many cities do not rename.

Because in order to win, you need not to ruin someone else’s, and create your own. And here with this question of our vis-a-vis is clearly problem,” concluded the expert.

Alexander Pletnev

In Ukraine inexorably approaching a full-scale default on public debt, which amounts to 70 billion USD, with about 40 billion USD is external public debt. It, in turn, about equally divided between private creditors and the official creditors (foreign states and international financial institutions).

Actually, default in Ukraine has already come, because Kiev on September, 23 did not do the next payment on the debt on Eurobonds in the amount of 500 mln USD. Financial experts with regard to this situation use the term “technical default”, but this is a stretch. The reason for it is that it is a question of default to private (not official) holders of Eurobonds. These private holders, according to some sources are funds Aurelius and Elliott, which became famous as the financial vultures.

In early October, expired 10 days, which, according to international practice, the debtor is given to he changed his mind and pay its obligations. Kiev is not changed its mind. International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) October, 5 issued its verdict: “technical default”, but soon the word “technical” will be removed.

Funds Aurelius and Elliott will demand their money and their requirements Kiev cannot get away. Under the rules of the creditors start to “cannibalize” the debtor immediately, but only after three months after the declaration of default. We give comment about this of Mikhail Delyagin: “… after Ukraine announced a technical default, Aurelius and Elliott later, exactly 90 days (the period in which Ukraine can still begin to repay the debt), will begin to tear the property of the country into pieces, such as the port of Odessa, who all still belongs to Ukraine, can go to them. Over the next 90 days to Ukraine do not apply any sanctions or lawsuits, but after this period, all debtors are entitled to apply to the Ukraine all accepted methods of recovery of debt”. In other words, Ukraine will be “smooth out” in early January, 2016.

And in December, they will have a payment of 3 billion dollars for liquidation of the debt on the loan of the Russian Federation. In Kiev there is no money. Missed payment will qualify as a full-fledged default. Before the momentous moment there are two months. Kiev is frantically looking for a way to solve this problem.

About one such seizure attempt, I already wrote. Recently in Lima was held the annual summit of the IMF and the World Bank, in its fields there was a meeting of finance ministers of Russia and Ukraine, where Natalia Yaresko offered Anton Siluanov to join the decision to restructure the debt of Ukraine, which allegedly had been reached in the end of August, that is begging for consent to not to pay the 3 bln dollars. This, as you might expect, was refused. Moscow’s position was fixed firmly: “Ukraine’s debt to Russia is official. And it cannot be considered as commercial debt, on which negotiations are ongoing leadership of Ukraine. It is the duty of the government to the government, it is provided on market terms, about two times lower than the cost of debt of Ukraine in the period of given this money”. It is not necessary to speak about the so-called restructuring of the Ukrainian debt is highly questionable. In the negotiations on the issue of debt securities holders participated Ukraine, which accounted for only about half of the commercial debt. It is very small. They must be at least 90%, preferably 100%. From my perspective, this is a bluff.

After the fiasco of Mistress Jaresko in Lima, Arseniy Yatsenyuk joined to the case, who on October 15 stunned all by the following statement: “Creditors of Ukraine by the majority, which is more than 75% of the votes in the Committee of creditors decided to write off the debts of Ukraine for the total amount of $ 3 billion and debt restructuring for a total amount of 8.5 billion dollars”. So the Prime Minister commented on the results of the next round of negotiations with creditors, which were spent on the 14th of October. At the same time Yatsenyuk said that the new round of talks will be held on October, 29 in London, and he urged the Russian Federation to join a scheduled meeting and to agree with the general conditions of “restructuring” of the Ukrainian debt.
Here there are several questions. Firstly, if the negotiations on the restructuring were successfully completed at the end of August, why the Finance Ministry held talks on October, 14? Secondly, if the talks on October, 14 ended successfully, why they need to spend another meeting in two weeks? Thirdly, about the negotiations on the 14th of October on the website of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, it is indistinct. It shows that Yatsenyuk has once again lied. It’s not just my opinion. In an interview with RIA “Novosti” President of the Ukrainian Analytical Center Alexander Okhrimenko said: “There is no agreement. To date, the Assembly has not taken place, there was no quorum. It must have been present 75% of the bondholders, but many of them were not. Now, on October 29, we will need everyone to collect, and it is hoped that it will be possible to collect them all. Then will begin the process of exchange (Eurobonds for new securities. — V. K.) On the website of the Ministry of Finance literally it is reported that on the 29th of October in London will be held a repeated meeting of the owners of the bonds maturing in December 2015, because at the meeting on October 14 was not achieved a quorum. Why do they gather again on October, 29? Most likely, it’s because of on October 14, no one voted for. I do not understand why we are talking about the owners of securities maturing in December 2015. I understand that today there is no vote. Therefore, on October, 29 we will wait for a new vote”.

I think that at the end of this month in London, a quorum will not be. And the Russian representatives there are just nothing to do.

Yatsenyuk cannot understand anything of all this, so he frantically pushes “unconventional initiatives” that would pre-empt the full catastrophe of default in December 2015. One of such initiative was the statement of the Prime Minister that Kiev intends to request in the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) more than 1 billion UAH from the Russian Federation for the accession of the Crimea. In addition, he expects the court to get from Moscow compensation for the damage caused to Donetsk and Lugansk. Yatsenyuk mentioned about the claims of Ukraine to Gazprom: “Separately, there are two key disputes in court against “Gazprom” as the contract of purchase and sale of gas and transit”. Yatsenyuk finished his statement on a threatening note: Kiev is ready to start against Moscow “legal war”.

It is difficult to understand what the overall intent of such statements is. Whether it needs for to assist Moscow psychological pressure and force to make to defer for settlement and restructuring 3-billion debts on Eurobonds. Whether to impose on Moscow the scheme of “mutual offsetting” counter-claims and to remove the burden of all debts to Russia (and they are several times more than the debt on Eurobonds). Or simply exacerbate Russian-Ukrainian relations and under this aggravation cajole from the West next portion of the money. Have a clear plan of Kiev, apparently, no, they operate on the principle “which will burn out.” And in the question with the plea Yatsenyuk, as usual, was bluffing. According to experts, the claims do not fall within the mandate of the ECHR. If claims would be adopted (for political reasons), their review is for a very long period. During this time, it can be not only a full-scale default in Ukraine, but 100 percent stripping of assets by foreign creditors of the country. Caricature requirements of Yatsenyuk immediately were canceled by the press secretary of the Russian president D.Peskov: “Crimea
– is the territory of Russia. Donbas – is the territory of Ukraine. And what is 1 trillion for? It is not clear … As for the public debt of Ukraine, it is in the position of the Russian side and nothing has changed”.

In my opinion, Moscow is demanding repayment of the Ukrainian debt does not have to wait for 20 December 2015, i.e. the date of final repayment of the loan. Under the terms of the loan, Moscow received the right to demand repayment by Kiev of entire amount of debt back in March of this year, when as a result of the collapse of the UAH relative level of sovereign debt has crossed the red line at 70% of GDP. And we can’t wait any longer, because already in early January 2016, the financial vultures will come out the arena and the debt history of Ukraine will enter to a critical phase.

The other day President Vladimir Putin invited the International monetary Fund to provide Kiev loan in the amount of $ 3 billion, so that these money went to pay off the debt of Ukraine to Russia in December. This is a simple and effective scheme to prevent the financial collapse of Ukraine. It’s been a few days; however, the IMF keeps completely silent about the proposal.

According to some sources, behind the scenes of the IMF under strong pressure from Washington they are working on an urgent redesign of the international rules in favor of Kiev. We are talking about a loan of the Russian Federation to Ukraine in the form of the purchase of Eurobonds in December 2013 to equate to commercial credit. Washington through the IMF tries to help Kiev to impose Moscow a debt restructuring. It is noteworthy that in recent months, when Kiev did Moscow offers to join the restructuring of debt on Eurobonds, the IMF kept silence, though had to explain to Kiev that the debt of Ukraine to the Russian Federation is official and is not subject to restructuring.

In the Ukrainian question, the IMF acts as an obedient tool of Washington. I wouldn’t be surprised if, being to date the largest official creditor of Ukraine, the tomorrow Fund at the direction of Washington will announce that it will be ready to participate in the restructuring of Ukrainian debt, although over 70 years of its existence the IMF this was not the case.

The debt situation in Ukraine is a manifestation of the agony of the Ukrainian economy, but not only. It is significant that the maturity date of the debt of Ukraine to Russia in the third week of December 2015 falls exactly on the anniversary of the IMF, which was created in December 1945. So the debt situation in Ukraine reflects the agony and the International monetary Fund, and I do not exclude that after its anniversary, the Fund may suddenly die.

Rebuilding has broken the thousand-year Russian model of development

TT: Andrei Ilyich, the Soviet empire collapsed not only through the instrument of the Cold War, after all, were there the internal contradictions?

AF: It was a combination of internal and external factors. If there were no internal contradictions, from the outside it would not have worked. But on the other hand, if there were only some internal factors, and if there were no external force that helped the part of the item, who wanted to become the owner, too, nothing would have happened. When we analyze the events of the late twentieth century, the distinction between internal and external factors becomes dotted. The Soviet Union destroyed the class alliance of the item and the establishment of the West, which merged in ecstasy for the destruction of the Soviet Union. A substantial part of the Soviet item did not want to destroy the Soviet society, moreover, much of the Western establishment that also did not want to. But they lost – and those and others.

TT: Andrey Ilich, tell us more about this instrument as “psychological warfare”

AF: Psychological warfare or, I prefer the term “psycho-historical war” is conducted on several levels; it is a broader term than “information war.” Information level – this is the easiest level psycho-historical war, a war on the level of facts. You are given false facts, false information flow and hammer you with this. The second level – the concept is how the information is packaged, is an interpretation. And the last level – is metaphysical or sense. This is what the senses can pull out of this concept. In the restructuring, we were first said, “Stalin is bad, Lenin is good”, then “Lenin is bad, Plekhanov is good” – a manipulation at the level of facts. They conclude that everything that happens in this country – it is bad. Autocracy – is bad, communism – it is bad, it’s kind of wrong country. And what’s the point of it is removed? Everything that happens in this country – need to change, because this country is fundamentally the wrong development. Yakovlev – the foreman of perestroika – said that by the Perestroika we have broken not only the Soviet Union, but a thousand years of Russian model of development.

Montenegro protests against the country’s entry into NATO. On the eve on the streets of Podgorica left than thousands of people were demanding the resignation of the government and in protest against the country’s entry into NATO, and the actions of the police that the day before by the bulldozers and batons crushed the tent camp of the opposition at the Parliament building. Also, the protesters accused Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic in the deteriorating of economic situation of the country.

During the Sunday rally the police again used tear gas, there are victims. One of the leaders of opposition and organizers of the rally, the MP Andrija Mandic said that the government “has until next Saturday; otherwise all will come from Montenegro in Podgorica”.

The Parliament of Montenegro adopted the resolution on support for integration into NATO on the 17th of September. For the NATO membership voted 50 of 79 deputies, against — 26 (Democratic front, “Demos”, the socialist people’s party and independent candidates), and three abstained. Shortly thereafter, the country was visited by a high-ranking delegation of the Alliance.

Expert’s comments

Leonid Savin:

In Montenegro, the police attacked the camp of protesters immediately after the visit of the NATO General Secretary. Everything is interconnected: Western boss arrives, gives instructions, security officers start to raid the camp. Also two members of Parliament were detained that characterizes not its best mode of Podgorica. We can say that in Montenegro, in power for twenty years is a mafia group that is trying to prolong their existence, now flirting directly with NATO.
When NATO bombed Milosevic in 1999, an agreement was reached by the leaders of the Republic, a former part of Yugoslavia; Montenegro is not subjected to shocks. Certain collusion between the political elite of Montenegro and the West has long existed. Protests show active participation of the people, requiring the elimination, as they say, the criminal regime and the establishment of the transitional government.
Moreover, if the protesters win, then this will positively reflect on all the Balkans. Montenegro could influence to Serbia. In fact, when viewed from a national perspective, the Montenegrins are Serbs, which eventually turned into Montenegrins. It is in the same way as they did with the Russians in the Ukraine, making from them the Ukrainians. Therefore, it is likely that the revival of Serbian national spirit that we see in Montenegro, will affect the entire region. It is important to note that Macedonia that is South of Serbia, is also under the strongest pressure from the West, which, through their emissaries of NGOs trying to change the ruling elite in their proxies. Therefore, the outcome of this struggle the future of the Balkans depends in general.

Alexander Bovdunov:

What happens in Montenegro is a natural phenomenon. Montenegro was part of Yugoslavia, when in 1999 NATO started the operation “Merciful angel”, in which the country was subjected to numerous bombings. The Montenegrins suffered less than the Serbs, but the memory of the aggression alive. And the fact that Prime Minister Milo Djukanovic by hook or by crook trying to drag the country into NATO, cannot but cause negative reaction of the majority of Montenegrins. If you will travel to the cities of the country, you will see a huge amount of graffiti that show that anti-NATO sentiment literally float in the air Montenegro.
Called “Maidan” events would be wrong, because here you do not see the impact of external forces, not coming any Ambassador with cookies; no one comes from abroad with money. We see the mobilization of Montenegrin civil society against what it perceives as a threat to themselves, their identity and their history. Accession to NATO is, in fact, would mean a break with the centuries-old tradition, because the Montenegrins always considered themselves a part
of the Serbian world, cultural, religious, ethnic whole.
It is very important that the events in Montenegro almost no coverage in large international media and very little by Russian. In the first case all is clear – they light up the Pro-Western actions. They don’t need to tell their audience about what is happening in Montenegro, because it goes against the flow, against the protégés of the West. But why there is the silence of the Russian media is unclear. Perhaps because of they are mostly generated from Pro-Western oriented to employees, which is conventionally made to broadcast patriotic agenda. But whenever occasion they will sabotage. Supply of Montenegrin history is the litmus test for the media. About the events in Montenegro they reported emphatically neutral, but in fact the media is grist to the mill of NATO. Talk about the fault of the protesters in the riots, but at best it is explained in passing, and then is silent that it is not a revolt against the government as such, but a protest against specific cases, primarily against the involvement of Montenegro in NATO. I think if we don’t clean the Russian media from the liberals, this information policy will continue.

On materials of the newspaper “Tomorrow”

Often faced with the question — what are the main objectives of the militias, for which they die, what they want? In other words, what is Novorossia fighting for? Let us try to understand the priorities of the new unfolding before our eyes the state.

For a Russian world!

At the heart of all processes taking place in the Novorossia, and developed on this space with different intensity during the past two decades – both before and after independence – is the Russian idea. To be Russian is the main motivation, to defend their right to belong to the Russian world, to speak Russian, to love and multiply the Russian culture, to profess the Russian Orthodox faith, to enjoy Russian nature, earth, space, surrounding you by the Russian people. Such simple, real, human desires, but it is expensive for them to pay.

The West is the antipode of the Russian world, which always fought with the Russians, first and foremost, with the Russian civilization. Because Russian, this, as written by Fyodor Dostoevsky, is panhuman. So Russian can be anyone who accepts our lifestyle, our way of thinking, our faith and our language, apart from his own. From the point of view of ethno sociology, Russian is the people. Not abstract people, whom we have translated as “people”, but actually, means the faceless – “the people”. It’s organic people, like a living organism. Not ethnicity, which is also a living organism, but your mind is too closed and homogenous. And it’s not a nation that consists of discrete, atomized, almost mechanical disparate individuals. But it is the people – cultural-civilizational type. Russian – poly blood, but culturally uniform, united in their desire to preserve and enhance the Russian civilization.

Russia itself has long ceased to be a civilization. Having survived the Soviet period, tried to dissolve everything Russian in the “new historical, social and international unity of people”, – the Soviet people, struggled from the liberal madness trying to drown the Russians in the world consuming global faceless bio robots, Russian civilization is so weak that the pulse is barely detectable. Signs of it are almost not in Russia, which has become more like a Corporation, but it in its entirety suddenly awakened in the Novorossia.

It freed from the shackles of the Corporation “Ukraine”, confronting the Ukrainian political nation, not Russian, Novorossia fights for the Russian civilization in its entirety. For Russian world, where the entire place! Reviving the Russian idea, having put it together from fragments, and stood in the fighting, watering of Russian blood, Novorossia begins the triumphal procession – to the restoration of a unified cultural and civilizational space – Great Russia – from Vladivostok to Dublin. This is a great, ambitious and fair will be the Russian World, born in the Novorossia. For this, indeed, is to fight and die!

For people power!

Over the past twenty years, the word democracy has almost become a dirty word. It’s not because democracy is bad. But it’s because the world is poisoned American democracy. But it is quite another matter. American liberal democracy, it is based on the individual. Its interest is above all, and commercial interests are sacred. The liberal individual is so great that it overshadows the people. What do people mean in liberalism? It’s random set of individuals and their interests, people, people, each for himself. In general liberalism is nothing but the sum of the private. But if private interests conflict with each other and the total does not add up. Power in a liberal democracy alienated from the masses so that they recognize them only as expendable. The people here are merely perceived – voted – free, on not for you to decide. A little more is egalitarian democracy. It is not individual, but many individuals placed at the forefront. The masses take revenge, but that does not cease to be atomized. This type of democracy is inherent in totalitarian societies. It implements the other extreme: the individual is nothing, weight is everything! The authority is faceless and mechanical. “Unknown fathers” manage a faceless society – unified, cold and lifeless.

Quite another is organic democracy that perceives people as a whole, living organism. In such a society everyone is a free individual, but the common interests are above the interests of the private. This society is holistic, whole and together and experiencing pain and joy, the solidarity society, where everyone is willing to help each other for the interests of the whole society and not just their personal. Organic democracy is when the people participates in his destiny, and not decide more than as a given, and, moreover, does not acquiesce with the decisions in favor of the units, to the exclusion of others. This organic society, judging their fate, and there is the living and whole nation – demos that implements its national power – Kratos.

Ukraine experienced a period of totalitarian egalitarian democracy, abruptly plunged into a nightmare of liberalism. These two extreme forms of alienation are discordant with the worldview of the Russian people. Novorossia is a resurgent Russian world, where the people are – organic, and total higher private. So there is the power of folk here, and not a representative democracy, but direct. Everyone is involved in the fate of his people, no one indifferent; no one in the party, for the common good is the good of each. Democracy is the principle which today is fighting armed Russian people, in order to survive, to live wholly, and to die for the common good. It’s for democracy, the direct democracy and self-government, and the people – as the subject.

For social justice!

There is nothing more for the Russian people than a sense of justice. It is in the West the law is for everyone, and we have justice – one for all. Where the law is not perfect, Russian man dispenses justice. What is the benefit of the people is true. The same that is in the interests of minorities or even individuals – in general serve no purpose. As always the wealth of some is at the expense of others. And if some of the excess, the other is a disadvantage.

Russian man does not like the rich, and rightly so. An honest man is working for everyone – for family, for society, for people. Rich is just for yourself. Working for the good of the people, or built the state fair. Personal profit is not only not fair, but vicious. This is Russian logic. And our understanding of justice, which would not, was the law.

The Donbas as part of Ukraine was left to the plunder of the oligarchs. The people here had been poisoned not only gross injustice, and lawlessness. What was created by generations of Russian Soviet men were suddenly assigned grabbers and parasites, putting personal profit above the common interests. The Novorossia resistance is resistance to injustice, fighting for a better world, where the general welfare – is the highest value.

The purpose of the Novorossia, which is worth fighting for, is social justice – without oligarchs, liberals and agents of Western influence that kills all living things, trampling Russian collective justice. Instead of the unrestrained market, contributing to the profit units — mixed economy, where large-scale productions are state-owned, collective – collectives, and small – each of us individually. There the social Darwinism that kills the weak and exalts cunning and dishonest in business, is replaced by the principle of economic philosophy. Social justice is Russian, and it so worth fighting for.

Russian world is a fair, organic and inhuman. In fact, he is the standard of being harmonious and conflict-free, kind, but strong. But for this better world we must fight. Russian people are not afraid of blood, and always spills it for other own, for their nation and their state. Today Novorossia is fighting not only for itself, it fights for a better more just world for all!

Valery KOROVIN

Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad asked Russia for military assistance to fight the Caliphate. Putin submitted the request to the Federation Council to use armed forces of Russia abroad. The Federation Council gave permission. Now in the underbelly of the Russian there are bombers hanging missile and bomb which are for strikes on targets controlled by ISIS.

And now there are voices about Imperial ambitions of Russia, about Russian expansion, the repetition of Afghanistan. All of this is pacifist delusions or insidious propaganda. Because of today the ISIS is an attack on the strategic frontiers of the Russian Federation. And defense of these boundaries is not only on the outskirts of Damascus, where shells of ISIS are exploding, but also in the North Caucasus and Central Asia.

In these moments the Taliban, who controlled the ISIS, are attacking Kunduz and go to Tajik border. The frontier post raised “the gun” and military base of Russia in a state of full combat readiness. ISIS breaks into the space, controlled CSTO. On spaces where there are not yet established, fragile States, many of whom are injured from Islamic radicalism.

Do we want to prevent in the regions of Central Asia the emergence of a monstrous explosion, the fragments will fly to Russia? Don’t you understand that ISIS stretches to the North Caucasus, and then in the Volga region? We can’t have that. Hence it’s the decision of our government to use the armed forces of Russia abroad.

As it is important in these circumstances the cooperation between the Americans and Russians! How important it is to coordinate American and Russia in the fight against ISIS! Yesterday such coordination was impossible. The contradictions between America and Russia seemed insurmountable and growing every day. The situation has changed today. It seems that the Americans understand that ISIS is a bloody monstrous Medusa, is spreading around the world. It’ll not be limited only by Syria, Iraq and Libya. It goes to Afghanistan. It is moving to Pakistan. It selected to Islamic Indonesia. America itself, with its Muslim groups is not immune from attacks of ISIS, as evidenced by the recent Boston bombings.

The rapprochement between Russia and America is felt in different directions and has different symptoms. More recently, the Americans demanded the immediate overthrow of Bashar al-Assad. Today they changed their position and believe that Assad may and has for some time to run the country and lead the resistance to ISIS. They talk about an evolutionary of transitional government that should be headed by Bashar al-Assad. And this coincides with the Russian point of view.

Recently Obama said that the mankind is facing three terrible evil. It’s ISIS, Ebola and Russia. Russia depressed Americans and was equated with ISIS in its terrible assault on humanity. However, the Americans refused it. At the UN, Putin and Obama shook hands and clinked glasses full of wine. Then they withdrew into a private meeting and agreed to coordinate efforts.

And look at Europe. Arrogant and snobby, it all these years attacked Russia with their claims. Now Europe is injured on Europe rushed the crowd of immigrants and refugees. It is the result of the monstrous explosion in North Africa, in the Arab States. And Merkel, realizing that the fall of Bashar will lead to the next wave of immigrants, says: Bashar Assad is a decent player and should be considered during negotiations on the Middle East. It echoed the Italians and the French. Israel is frightened by the appearance on its borders the merciless fire of anti-Semitic Caliphate, the intensity of which far exceeds and Hamas, and Hezbollah. And here is Netanyahu in Moscow, and the Pro-Israel lobby in America puts pressure on President Obama, so he moved closer to Russia and softened his position on the Russian question.

And finally, while Americans pondered and created their ephemeral inactive coalition, Russia has created its own coalition. It’s Syria, Iraq, Iran, Kurdish units, and Russia itself is standing behind it, approaching its China and India. Americans have to reckon with the emergence of the coalition, which under certain conditions could escalate into a military-strategic Alliance.

Today between America and Russia appeared coordination possibilities, opened a direct line of communication and interaction between the military structures of the two countries. This line will extend the data on the objectives, the results of the bombing, about the areas in which will appear aviation one way or the other.

Surprisingly, the story reproduces their designs and makes them from the past to the present. For some mysterious regularities of distribution of power capacities, economies, ethnic and social vectors of these designs are repeated almost tautological accuracy. The current situation in the world resembles the situation in Europe 30-ies. There, in Europe, there was a group of liberal democratic States. Black Hitler had risen on his hind legs.

Then there was the Soviet Union. And Western Democrats have long been preferred Hitler to the Soviets. They incited Hitler to the Soviets. They assumed that Hitler would not break the ridge. And it lasted until Hitler barked to the rest of Europe, hitting Poland, occupied France, threw the English into the sea. And only then they turned their attention to the Soviet Union. It was created the anti-Hitler coalition. And the West turned a blind eye to all that was unhappy in the previous period. And it was on the accession of the Baltic States, Western Ukraine and Belarus, and on the Finnish war, and, of course, on human rights. Anti-Hitler Pact was held. On this analogy, Putin said during his speech at the UN. How will the events develop? Will we be able in the shortest possible time to rein in ISIS and to defeat it? Could after the victory over the ISIL to collect a second Yalta, to resolve the accumulated contradictions in the world and to harmonize international life? How does anybody know? It is only the analyst or dreams now. And today to the underbelly of the Russian bombers hanging missile and bomb, poured into fuel tanks, and planes take off.

God bless you, Russian pilots! Victory to you!

Alexander Prokhanov

One of the leaders of Russian spring in Donetsk Pavel Gubarev released his first book “the Torch of the Novorossia”, which was released in the publishing house “Peter”.

“Through mud and blood, through the smoke of fires and the clouds of lies the flame shines — the torch of Novorossiya. No, it is not extinguished; no matter how it was tried to destroy by its enemies of all stripes. The basis of a popular revolt against the “Europeanization” with a new face the great, noble ideas lie. Here, in Donbas, in the roar of battles, it had forged the Great Russian project of our response to the global plans of the slaveholders. It’s the image of a great future of our people. And let it is still the idea, but it is coming. And it’s a Novorossia as an organic part of Russia, and Russia itself. How did it start the people’s revolution in the Donbas? Was there a “terrible hand of Moscow”? It is told in the description of the book on the website of the Publishing house “Peter”.

In an interview with journalist Alexander Chalenko, Gubarev said that in his work for the first time he made public some previously unknown facts Russian uprising in the Donbas in the spring of 2014. For example, about how the squad of Strelkov came to Slavyansk.

“There are all the details of the first period of the struggle in Donetsk. There are no details anywhere of how Strelkov came into the Donbas. My group was doing it. At that time I was in prison. So, all the events were recounted by the participants of the popular uprising in Slavyansk. They are co-sponsored of my book. They are my colleagues from the history Department of the University. They are my comrades, who stood on the path of struggle, united in a single fist of the people’s militia of Donbas,” said Gubarev.

Also in the book, the author examines a 24-year period of Ukrainian independence.

“Dismantle it at the example below: as we learned at school; how we studied at the University; I relate to Russian organizations in Ukraine, a failed strategy of Moscow in the Russian question in Ukraine. Then I smoothly move to the Outbreak, which was called the Russian spring. I’m talking about its causes, genesis, talk about all the pitfalls. I give a detailed scenario of what happened in Donetsk, what I saw with my own eyes. The book is emotional. The episodes of the war, many women read and cry. The book is dedicated to all who fell in the war for Novorossia,” said Gubarev.

According to the author, in the book he tried to formulate the image of the country-dream – the Novorossia.

“In the book there is little theory there, mostly practice. All ideas mentioned in the book were learned by me from the Russian authorities: political, economic and managerial. They are as Glazyev and Katasonov. I was helped in writing by doctorates in economics and by demographers. All it happened in a live conversation. Therefore, they are co-authors of my book too. I cite in the book quite extensive quotes belonging to them. In the book, I created an image of Novorossia as a country of dreams, what we want to see it. I am convinced that this way many will like,” said the leader of the Russian spring.

As Pavel Gubarev told the “Torch of Novorossia” was published with a circulation of 4,000 copies, the book has 420 pages. The cover shows him, Gubarev, although, neither he nor his co-authors didn’t want it. However, in the discussion about it marketers of the publishing house won.

Alexander Prokhanov

On the 3rd and the 4th of September the whole world and Russia crossed a certain line, a Rubicon, beyond which everything changed and will never, is the same. It is certainly not in the military parade marking the 70th anniversary of the victory of the Chinese people over the Japanese aggressors and the end of the Second World War, which was held in the capital of China in the square called the Gate of Heavenly Peace. The fact that the leaders of the “collective West”: the United States and its allies, together with their dominions, colonies, semi-colonies, etc. this event defiantly ignored — with the exception of the Czech President Milos Zeman. Official comments about it look as mocking. For example, the press Secretary of the President of the United States said: “I must admit, I actually didn’t know about the plans of the President of China to commemorate the end of World War II”. If this is not the “psychism” and if we exclude the possibility that aides to Barack Obama are able to independently, without coordination with the chef to throw in the trash an invitation from Beijing, such a statement can be seen as a denial of China’s role in World War II, as not only a spit in the face to the Chinese leaders and XI Jinping personally, but also on the graves of the 35 million Chinese killed by the Japanese aggressors. Even reference to the fact that the 44th President of the United States does not consider it possible for himself in the current situation to be with Vladimir Putin, who in the West is almost the personification of the “world’s evil”, would look much more reasonable and understandable… Why not, too clear — so to “burn bridges” in relations with Russia (not Putin personally, and Russia) no one Obama was not allowed.

Of course, if the example of the gallant Yankee, which Tiananmen square was represented by Ambassador to Beijing Max Bokus, by the way — the former head of the Finance Committee of the U.S. Congress, has not followed its allies and partners, the issue of “global leadership” of the USA was fit would be considered closed. But the actions of the “collective West” were extremely consistent — for example, the UK was represented by the Director of Foreign and Colonial investment Fund (Foreign & Colonial Investment Trust) Kenneth Clark. To violate an unspoken “taboo” decided the leaders of only twenty countries in the world — however, with 40% of the world population and 35% of the global economy — all those who openly does not accept the dictates of the USA and big transnational capital, who United around the Chinese-Russian strategic Alliance.

This division of the world into “Pro-American” and “anti-American” now finally became a geostrategic reality. While “arithmetic majority” is on the side of the Western world, and this should not surprise — there are consequences not only of centuries of colonial domination the Western powers, but also the catastrophic collapse of the Soviet project, after which the whole world was left one-on-one with the undisputed hegemony of the United States, and not all of this date survived: from Slobodan Milosevic and Najibullah to Saddam Hussein and Muammar Gaddafi.

“Uncle Sam” is still feared around the world, and this global version of the “Stockholm syndrome” to overcome the impossible at once. But once the project of Pax Americana will suffer at least one serious defeat, the number of supporters drastically reduced; it was two centuries ago, in the case of Napoleon, and 70 years ago, in the case of Hitler.
The logic of events suggests that such a defeat has already been decided, and it’s not far off.

The parameters of the confrontation

Despite the impressive demonstration of military power of the PRC, the speech of XI Jinping on September, 3 was emphasized restrained. “We Chinese love peace. Regardless of how much stronger we become, China will never seek hegemony or expansion. China will never cause suffering to other countries,” he said, reporting the reduction of the armed forces for 300 thousand people. While “all countries must work together to maintain international order and system prescribed by the purposes and principles of the UN Charter”, to create a new type of international relations those are built “on mutually beneficial cooperation… to pay special attention to the great cause of international peace and development”. The Chinese President also called on “to prevent the repetition of historical tragedy,” which was the Second World War, claimed the lives of more than 100 million people. Of course, the attempt by the military to avoid socio-economic catastrophe of the “collective West” looks unlikely, but our planet isn’t still turning into a “global Libya” just because a large-scale military action against China and Russia will instantly result in unacceptable damage to the aggressors. Today, however, the whole Arsenal of “cold war 2.0” is directed not only against Moscow, but against Beijing — in Washington has already announced the possibility of introducing anti-Chinese sanctions — allegedly due to “hacker attacks” against the American servers, the ongoing “China”. And when for one week at the end of August sounded the explosions at chemical plants in Tianjin (sodium cyanide) and Zibo, and also at a metallurgical plant in Anshan, it is hard to believe that all these disasters happened “by themselves”. Then you have to believe in something “by itself” there was also an explosion at an American military base in the Japanese city of Sagamihara… Very similar to what the high Contracting parties “exchanged greetings with gestures” and this is only the beginning of the real confrontation.

Again, in late August throughout China have been arrested more than 100 people belonging to the Catholic Church and several Protestant denominations, which caused vigorous protests on the part of official Washington — firstly by the U.S. Ambassador for special assignments in connection with religious freedoms David Saperstein (can same all the time know when you want to?). The reason for the arrests began protests against the closure of a number of churches and houses of prayer, but the arrest, judging by the list of those arrested, was only a pretext for isolating the Pro-Western and Pro-American “agents of influence” in Chinese society.

However, the main “fighting” while is on the monetary front. Its milestones was the devaluation of the yuan, begun August 20 rally of global stock markets and sale by the Chinese authorities of U.S. treasuries amounting to more than $ 100 billion., as well as the collapse of the quarterly Treasury 13-Week Bill to “default” level in 3 cents per dollar. On last 5 September in Ankara “economic” G20 summit, U.S. Treasury Secretary Jack Lew said that China “must answer” for these actions. As if not under the dictation of Washington, the international monetary Fund, which has already pointedly positions himself as an instrument of U.S. foreign policy, violating all their own rules for issuing loans to the Kiev regime refused to include the yuan in the currency basket of “special drawing rights” (SDR) and to review equity in favor of third world countries.

However, held in July in Ufa the summits of the SCO and BRICS was laid the Foundation of a new financial world order, if not completely eliminating the dollar from the system of international payments, sharply limiting its scope to that of the “Washington regional Committee” and the fed flooding the world with trillions of unbanked real “bucks”, still like death. These are New development Bank of BRICS and Asian infrastructure investment Bank, and the creation of a unique international Depository and clearing center Euroclear and systems of international transfers, SWIFT, etc.

Meanwhile Russia…

Of course, the growing American-Chinese confrontation greatly facilitates the position of Russia. Firstly, it’s due to changes in the “direction of the main blow” by the “collective West”. Secondly, due to the fact that “to put pressure” on Russia and “push” on the Chinese-Russian strategic Alliance in which military-political and resource potential of the “Russian bear” complements the production-technological and demographic potential “red dragon”, is as said before in Odessa, “two big differences”. For the last ones many allies and partners of the US, that is, “do not subscribe”. And so willing to use every opportunity to build and reinforce the Foundation for future relations with the new global “center of force”, which now by the fact of its existence is to attract a significant portion of the European economy. And the transformation of the “axis of Beijing—Moscow” axis, “the Beijing—Moscow—Berlin—Paris”, most likely because of the wild pressure of Washington on its European allies (the anti-Russian sanctions, debt crisis, migrants, etc.), would mean the collapse of any U.S. claims of “global leadership” in the twenty-first century. And this trend once again stressed the past in Vladivostok I East economic forum, which concluded over 80 agreements for a total amount of 1.3 trillion rubles (20 billion dollars). But it not important even by itself; this so to speak, meaning is in “delineation of dishes”.

Russian companies have signed large-scale agreements with Indian energy Corporation ONGC, which is included in the development of the Vankor field, and with the Japanese Mazda, intentional to produce their cars and engines in the territory of Primorsky Krai.

There, in Vladivostok, Gazprom signed an agreement with the Dutch-British Shell, Austria’s OMV and German E.On about establishing a joint project company that will build the gas pipeline “Nord stream-2”.

Looks even more interesting agreement on asset swap between Gazprom and German Wintershall, in which the Russian “natural monopoly” has received 100% of the shares in European gas storage Wingas, Wieh, Wiee, and 50% in the company Winz, a leading exploration and production of hydrocarbons in the North sea.

Separate item you can select an agreement between “Gazprom” and SIBUR on construction of the Amur gas processing plant, where, among other things, must be critical for the Russian economy the volume of ethane and helium. As you know, SIBUR owned by a group NOVATEK, in which substantial stakes of shares owned by the German Deutsche Bank, France’s Total, and its main shareholder is ZAO Depositary and Clearing Company — 45,79% of the shares, through intermediaries owned by the group “Moscow exchange” (in number of shareholders — EBRD and Chinese Chengdong Investment Corporation, 51% of shares in “free float” on the stock exchange).

In other words, the regime of anti-Russian sanctions at the forum in Vladivostok was finally buried with the full involvement of the European allies of the USA, and this can be considered the main economic result of the events of 3-4 September in the Far East. It is no coincidence that, speaking before the participants of the forum, Vladimir Putin said: “A new configuration of trade routes, and economic cooperation in Eurasia. Of course, this will have an impact not only on the development of our continent, but also on the global economy as a whole.” For the audience at the “captains” of big business and big politics, it was clear that it is not only and not so much about the economy…

What’s next?

It is clear that the onset of the global conflict of the two superpowers of modern times, the United States and China, from the sphere of economy and Finance will inevitably spill into the political sphere, as well as, possibly, in the military sphere, for example in the form of “hybrid wars”, as it is today in the Middle East and Ukraine.

In that context, the forthcoming jubilee 70th session of the United Nations, which opens in new York on the 15th of September and conclude on the 6th of October, looks almost “chance of last resort” in order to avoid escalation of the conflict and its projections in the military-political sphere.

“The collective West” headed by the “Washington regional Committee” is desperate for any weakening of the Russian-Chinese strategic Alliance, which became even stronger as a result of the Russian President’s visit to Beijing. This applies whether the Union as a whole and its members individually. To unseat Putin and/or XI Jinping is the real “ultimate goal” of U.S. policy, which is broadcasted to the Kremlin, by such persons as Mikhail Khodorkovsky, Sergei Guriev, Alexey Venediktov and other “agents of influence”.

The size of the “cookies” that may promise potential “Kremlin conspiracy against Putin”, every day is growing almost exponentially. It is about different versions, not only regarding the “legitimate” change of government using the technology of “color revolution”, but even the physical elimination of the leader of the Russian state (one of the failed attempts of this kind, a number of experts called the destruction of the Malaysian “Boeing”, which was supposed to be “air force one”, which, however, over Warsaw took a course not at Sochi, as previously assumed, and Moscow). In parallel, creating socio-economic preconditions for mass protests of the Russian population, whose standard of living has been steadily declining as a result of concerted action “economic block” of the current government and the Central Bank of the Russian Federation.

But, apparently, all these efforts of the “collective West” won’t reach their goal, because they contradict the “logic of opportunity” that much stronger “logic of desires” — in this case, the United States and several other geostrategic actors to maintain their “global leadership” and “Empire of the dollar”.

Nikolay Konkov, Alexander Nagorny

On September, 16 in the “Russian center” that is located on the fourth floor of the Donetsk Republican universal scientific library named by N.K. Krupskaya, there was the presentation of the book “The Sacred meanings of Novorossiya”. The presentation was conducted by the author himself – a political figure, head of the Association of Orthodox experts Kirill Frolov.

Recall that a concise summary of this book was printed in the appendix to the journal of the Izborsk club of Novorossiya “New Land”. By the way, the magazine staff brought copies of the app in the “Russian center”. They could be taken by anyone.

This presentation, like all activities of the Izborsk club, gathered a large number of people. Among them were members of the Izborsk club, students and even Orthodox activists; they every day are conducting religious processions around the government House. The author told the audience about his book and outlined the inherent ideas.

Frolov is confident that Russia will not leave the Novorossia.

“We did not pass Bashar al-Assad. And after that, pass the DPR and the LPR would be absurd,” he says.

In addition, Frolov does not exclude that the Novorossia can enter into the Russian Federation. According to him, it will happen if the Ukrainian authorities will continue to behave inappropriately. And since the adequacy of their actions is not observed, such a scenario is quite probable.

As a bright example of the inadequacy of the Ukrainian authorities Frolov led banners of Kherson SBU, on this is written:

«We’ll cure love to Russia”. Frolov said: “This is a state security service. The Ukrainian government by its mouth declares that love for Russia is a criminal offence. And the state of Ukraine says it. That is, if the DPR and the LPR will join Ukraine, even on the rights of the Confederation, it will still be a shared service of the SBU. They will punish anyone who will claim that they love Russia.”

Frolov noted that today many Russian politicians have the illusion that in Ukraine adequate policies can come to the power with which it will be possible to conduct a dialogue and even make friends. But it never happened and can’t be, because the idea of Ukrainians is an inherently anti-Russian:

“Unfortunately, the main problem of Russia, no less than the “fifth” and “sixth” column, is incompetence and lack of understanding in the Ukrainian question. Most Patriotic experts live by the myth that Ukrainians are a brotherly people. What if in Ukraine the power will be replaced, we’ll be friends again. But the problem is that Ukraine government has never been adequate and sane. The same Kuchma was no less Russophobe than any Yarosh. Remember how he crushed the Russians in the Crimea.”

Frolov believes that Ukrainians was the result of an error made by Peter the 1st:

“The Little Russians in the 17th century did not think about any Ukrainians, and asked the Moscow tsars on the reunification of 24 times. Then even a diseased imagination and no one could not imagine that in Kiev and Lvov live non- Russians. Where were those theorists of Ukrainians from? Personally I think that all the troubles of Russia from the Russian aristocracy, formed during the reign of Peter I. It is a fundamental error – the national modernization without the support of Orthodox tradition. Therefore were secular intellectuals who had an inferiority complex in front of the Poles. They seem to have forgotten that the poles had repeatedly burned Moscow, and destroyed Orthodoxy for centuries. In addition, it was done the unthinkable: education in the Western region of the Empire was given to the Polish gentry. All of this has led to the emergence of essentially Russophobic Ukrainians”.

Frolov emphasized that no friendship between the Russian people and the followers of Ukrainians have never been, and cannot be. He said that they are the separatists that divided
Russian people:

“Throughout the history the separatists were followers of the Ukrainians. They are not just the separatists, and the bloody nihilists, which not only divide and destroy the Russian people, but also seek to destroy Russian history. We, the Great Russians, are supporters of the reunification the world’s largest divided nation”.

Natalia Chaiko

On September, 19 in the “Russian center” on the 4th floor of the Donetsk Republican universal scientific library named after N.K. Krupskaya there was the presentation of a collection of military writers “I fought in the Novorossia”. The presentation was attended by Chairman of the Union of writers of the DPR Fedor Berezin, Deputy Vladislav Rusanov there were Vladimir Skobcsov and George Savitsky too.

The storybook was published back in April of this year by the Russian publishing house “Yauza”, but because of problems with customs copies of the book arrived in Donetsk only in August. But August is a time of vacations; it was decided to hold the presentation in September.

A collection of “I fought in the Novorossia” is actually the first prose book about the war in the Donbas. The collection includes stories by 17 authors from Donetsk, Lugansk and other cities of Donbas, as well as St. Petersburg, Moscow and the Crimea.

Note, the book also includes stories of Berezin and Savitsky.

If we talk about the stories included in this collection – they are vary in style and genre. Some can be defined as an essay or diary entries, others are realistic military prose; others include elements of fantasy and mysticism.

Introducing the book, Fyodor Berezin said:

“The collection is very strong. But its circulation of 2 thousand copies for Moscow is very small. It was as a match that was extinguished before it ignited. And given that most of the copies was brought here, I don’t know what’s left for, so to speak, the greater Russian world. Actually, I believe that instances of this collection need to import clandestinely in Kiev. So that Kiev residents could feel what the inhabitants of Donbas had felt”.

Donetsk readers can get acquainted with the stories of the collection in the “Russian center” and in the libraries of the city.

Gennady Zilaykov

This day changed the world forever. As corny as these words may sound, but this is clearly the case. And of course the matter is not at terrorism which was, is, and likely always will be and its victims are civilians. Events of the fourteen-year-old forced the Western world openly to renounce the fundamental declarations of priority civil liberties over security and the results of this failure instantly reflected not only in Western countries, but also on the device of civilization in general.

It just so happened that the people who yesterday spoke about the personal space and the intervention of the state into private life, ran headlong to install security cameras. Now they humbly undresses almost to goal going through security at airports; call the police finding forgotten on the bus stop bag and even are very ready to be fingerprinted. They do not complain — such times and for the benefit of all this is “for our safety”.

Prior to the tragedy in New York mankind has lived a relatively prosperous decade. The exception was the only countries of the former USSR, because of this prosperity was achieved at our expense. Countries of the former Yugoslavia fell out of “safe” too. There as in Donbas today for the welfare of the “civilized” world we had to pay tens of thousands of human lives. Then in a prosperous world of castrated aggression from a large section of the capitalist pie the masters of the world-80s — PMCs – were pushed by. Even Private Security Firms began to turn into “sharashka” employment of disabled slobs and drunks. Obviously this situation could not last for long — only while there was extensive development of the world system due to the end of the Cold War and conversion.

And now the events of September 2001 radically changed the situation. The world panicked and services to provide security once again become a lucrative business. And yet trade of related products and equipment in the production of which a technological breakthrough happened. Not without the help of the state of course. It under the noble pretext imposed new safety rules. The result: the number of surveillance cameras, smoke detectors and other imposed under these new rules of goods exceeds in the developed countries the population. Monitoring and surveillance adopted a truly Orwellian’ proportions – what yesterday seemed as dystopia now is taken for granted.

Who benefits — think for yourself. I’m not going to list well-known interpretations and repeat the arguments in their support. Just remind that the official version has been challenged repeatedly and convincingly. But, alas, supporters of the official version were not even trying to prove their point of view using arguments; they use grimaces, gestures, hints, shortcuts, accusations of madness. To challenge the official interpretation was ashamed and bad for the reputation. Moreover in respect of dissenters in the matter of citizens it was applied a classic set of totalitarian methods. From punitive psychiatry — Western magazines insist that relatives of overly active whistleblowers to pay attention to the mental health of their loved ones, to eliminate – a terrible fate befell dozens of alternative researchers of the terrorist attack of the eleventh of September. The most famous is the writer Hunter Thompson – author of world renown, the winner of many literary awards. He is the real, in a good way, American, a stubborn individualist who devote his live to defending his own principles in a world of hypocrisy; he put a bullet in the forehead in the process of revelatory documentary. According to the official version Thompson just didn’t want to get old. Confirmations were the last words left on the screen of the computer a minute before the ill-fated shot: “football season is over”. And although the death of the writer caught him at the annual column about the final North American soccer League, it was the favorite hobby of the writer for a dozen years; these words have given a completely different meaning.

However, the elimination in the era of struggle with the bogey of terrorism has become commonplace. The President of the United States, in particular, has achieved the legal right to “order” anyone at all — both in the U.S. and any other point of the globe. And eliminates didn’t force, this time revealing, long to wait. The destruction of terrorists of Osama bin Laden by a detachment of U.S. Marines remembered everyone. But not everyone remembers that the Marines — liquidators, a month later died under mysterious circumstances. All of them in full force. Moreover not all know that according to declassified reports of Pakistani intelligence that the leader of “al-Qaeda” not the first month was kept under house arrest and under the supervision of the Pakistani authorities. So to take him alive it was not easy. Probably indicative of the murder was more important than facts that could give the terrorist number one.

Indeed the fighting terrorism was worse than terrorism itself. And we in the Donbas know this better than most and both the famous the relativity label “terrorist”. So people threw Molotov cocktails to the police on the Maidan, involving government buildings and threatening violence to the President the terrorists were not recognized. But our protest against the illegal seizure of power through armed terror and a plebiscite on secession from Ukraine declared terror. A civil war which was started by the Kiev “putschists” in Novorossia called anti-terrorist operation. It does not matter that it is conducted with the use of heavy artillery against civilians. That is just the ATO that the image of the enemy was extended to all without discrimination — the elderly, children, women. And as for me, a man repeatedly accused of terrorism, it is more than obvious. Therefore as the honored “terrorist of Donbas” I call in connection with this date to honor the memory of Americans, who died under the rubble of the world Trade Center in New York and Afghans, who were killed by the U.S. drone attacks, and the Syrians with the Iranians, who lost their homes due to American anti-terrorist operation in the middle East, and our countrymen: all victims of terror and all victims of anti-terrorist operations what often find themselves worse than any terror.

Pavel GUBAREV

George Orwell wrote that nominal equality does not exclude the presence of more than equal. This paradox was coined in the context of the Cold war to discredit the revolutionary social ideas and democracy relevant to any system, declaring the principle of equality. Here, for example, there are international relations: the modern (post-war) world order is theoretically based on the principle of protecting the weak. But the Institute a “more equal” this principle, alas, does not cancel. Because there is just of the country and there are members of the UN Security Council those have veto power. In other words, there are countries more or less equal, like George Orwell’s pigs in relation to other animals.

And there are the “most equal ones” in the world. The veto of the UN Security Council is not a decree to them, it is only a recommendation. Let’s not point fingers, but they recently celebrated Independence Day, which they once defended just as the residents of Novorossia now defend theirs. But the UN or its Security Council were not there. And there was no struggle for everything good and against everything bad. So there was no conflict of basic postulates: the right of Nations to self-determination and the right of the state to defend its territorial integrity. There was not multilevel equality as at Orwell, whose actualization had turned the world into continuous combat spies with spies and terrorists with freedom fighters.

Americans celebrate Independence Day July 4th. And not only Americans: Hollywood did a bit of Americans significant portion of the population of the globe, and now America’s friends from all over the world send to Washington greetings and congratulations. Even the British congratulate them, for whom this day would not like a holiday, and the date of the defeat inflicted on them by militants, terrorists and “separas” with Washington at the head.

Now here’s Independence Day of Ukraine it is also a holiday and is also recognized in the world. Although this day is not so joyful for many Ukrainians. Even Russia has Independence Day, though it is impossible to understand from whom Russia depended. But also about the territorial integrity of the USSR nobody cared. It’s not Ukraine that has proved more equal in comparison with other Soviet republics so that its exit from the USSR only welcomed (unlike released from Ukraine Donetsk and Lugansk republics, as well as the Crimea). Probably they “look ugly”. Or if you prefer, they were not sufficiently equal in comparison with Ukraine.

Why? It is because there are double standards. The arguments of our opponents devoid of logic and are based on repeated the same allegations and insulting labels, like the notorious “cattle”. It is a great question that’s just how “not-cattle” George Washington and associates were.

However, God is the judge them, to the United States. The problem is not about them, there is the problem of hypocrisy, as a fundamental principle of modern diplomacy. So President Poroshenko welcomed the Americans in the Independence Day. In particular, he writes that the Ukrainian soldiers are fighting in the Donbas against Russia for American ideals. Namely, for “freedom”, which supposedly brings together American, consuming a significant portion of the world’s resources, and Ukrainian, utilized in the Donbas due to lack of funds to feed. And no matter what freedom they understand in their own way. And if in the view of American freedom is the ability for thirty years to repay the loan on the house that for Ukrainians it’s being burned in the city, political repression, gunmen in masks, and the right with impunity to rob and kill.

President Obama has his own freedom. It is rear-wheel drive. It is because the 44th President understands it that way. And if people of a certain persuasion can now register “marriage”, the remaining questions from the last century such as civil liberties or the right to private life are overshadowed. And never mind that the U.S. President is now allowed to order the killing of their own citizens, and intelligence agencies to record all telephone conversations and poking around in the electronic mailboxes of any inhabitant of the Earth; we do not live now in the twentieth century. Another thing is sodomite “marriages”. After all, in the end, Obama promised them. And President Obama, as we know, does not “drive away empty”: he promised to withdraw troops from Iraq — brought up them, though, and sent private army and ISIS there. He promised to resolve the issue of Bin Laden and he had decided it, in vain, that the latter was under house arrest in Pakistan and his “capture” cost the lives of dozens of U.S. marines who knew too much about this highly Hollywood liquidation. He promised to restore relations with Cuba —they were restored, however, for some reason he destroyed Libya, Syria and Ukraine, in addition he soured relations with the Russian Federation. Here goes, even if it is not possible to resolve the issue according to the rules, in this case through Congress, legal loopholes become relevant. In particular, as Yanukovych appealed to the Supreme Court for returning the Constitution of 2004. And results, by the way, had been made the same: the governors of Texas and Louisiana spoke about the decision of the Supreme judge US harshly and negatively, and promised that on the territory entrusted to them, this decision will not operate. That in fact obvious is separatism in the truest sense of the word. The exit from the country is the refusal to obey laws and, in particular, court decisions.

Will America go on the path of Ukraine? This assumption seems absurd for many because too prosperous it looks. But it is only at first glance: Ukraine before the coup was also quite prosperous. But the scenario of armed suppression of protests in Texas is already known. And according to the leak from the General staff, they even used within the teachings of U.S. forces last spring. They did not mention about gay “marriage” in scenarios. It was only about sabotage Texas conservatives some “progressive” programs of the Federal government. And although the training is nothing more than the training, the real reasons for the implementation in the U.S. the scenario of the civil war lie in the plane of the purely economic. And as the government of Azarov-Yanukovych proved to be beneficial to relieve themselves of responsibility for the growing inconsistencies of credit with debit and for elites of the USA war could become if not a panacea, at least the way of debt relief through artificially created force majeure.

In Ukraine, by the way, this method gave excellent results — society under the pressure of war propaganda was not able to resist anti-social government initiatives and capitulated. And if during the reign of Yanukovych any attempt of the state to receive from the citizens a little more ended tents and maidans, today it occurs relatively quietly. First of all the country has received immunity, and secondly no one wants to meet at the house “ucro-patriots” with a revolver and a trash container. After all anyone who questioned the adequacy of the Ukrainian political leadership is an agent of Moscow and Putin personally. It’s not Ukrainian “know-how “, such an experience can be repeated in any other part of the planet. “Patriots” which are aspiring to political violence are everywhere. And it is possible that Ukraine was tested and passed the running scenario of the coming collapse of the world reserve currency, which have long spoken by all and Sundry. And maybe it is the scenario of the collapse of the global hegemon. Well, it serves…

Pavel GUBAREV

On today’s Ukraine, as you may have noticed, has a selective memory.

For example, the victory in the great Patriotic war — they are at least, of joint. And sometimes they presented as purely Ukrainian victory (if the fighting occurred on the territory of modern Ukraine).

But the revolution of October 17th or collectivization is like outside of it, despite the fact that Ukraine had its most powerful Bolshevik movement for collectivization and they are responsible to the same extent are proud of the victories of the great Patriotic war.

And I’m sure DPR and LPR can give a number of good texts…And Maidan raised a cloud of turbidity, and here it is now will settle for a long time and for a long time. They will have about this is no epic; it will not be the beginning of the great Ukrainian statehood.

In Ukraine, meanwhile, they used a cheap trick: if the USSR led to the collectivization Jew Kaganovich and Russian Postyshev, then the demand is not with the Ukrainians.

Alexander Smirnov in his book “the Novorossia Project” wittily remarked about this: actually the leader of the Bolshevik military coup of October 1917 was Ovseenko (who took the pseudonym Antonov-Ovseenko), and Dybenko and Krylenko declared himself commanders of the Army and Navy.

Why would we not hang on Ukrainians costs of the Bolshevik revolution?

All this is silly, of course — all of these are jokes. But we understand here. And there’s nothing silly is not it seems for them. Now, we repeat for pinning.

Revolution and collectivization were arranged by filthy Russians. Industrialization and the victory in the great Patriotic staged were arranged by the Ukrainians themselves. It’s the beauty. You cannot complain after all.

I would like to recall what the Izborsk club started from. It began with Izborsk city. It’s not far from Pskov, ancient Russian land. And the Izborsk club had been created as a platform for those who wants to think and to think for the state. Turns out the work started with the creation of not only an intellectual basis, but with some mystical point.

There is a hill down Izborsk , where members of the Izborsk club from each of his trips brought the earth. And behold, this land from different parts of the Russian World is spread out on the hill. Of course, it is a symbol. But this symbol was created precisely in order to begin the gathering of the Russian lands, picking up this Great Russian World which is wider political and geographical borders of the Russian Federation. And this process started. We see that Russia reunited with the Crimea. The land of Donbass should be in this hill too. And it is there. On this hill lies a land with Saur-Grave not by chance.

I would like to say about the term “Novorossiya”. If you divide this word into two parts you get a “New Russia”. Actually all of us who live in Russia, in Donbass, in other parts of the Russian World, feel the need to create this “New Russia”, the update of the state which we now exist, combining these Russian lands, which were treacherously confused in 1991. Those who did it, they “wasted” not only what was created by the Russian Communists. They “wasted” all that was created by the work of several centuries. Lands that Russia had joined after the time of troubles were lost. Thank God that not all. Including, Ukrainian land was lost. Of course it’s a great tragedy. Very often you can hear absolutely fair remark that Russia was not involved in the work in Ukraine for two decades. And, unfortunately, the results of this inaction in the form of Nazi battalions and parts of the civilian population of Ukraine, which had been saturated with certain ideas, is obvious. Yes, this is Russia’s fault, but only partially. Because we were in a situation where miraculously managed to save Russia itself. She had neither the ability nor the strength to do outside their borders, because we had to do the salvation of Russia inside. Almost because as blinding, almost as dope enveloped in fact most of the people of Russia. This dope dispelled. In Russia began to be created Patriotic forces.

And, in fact, Alexander Andreyevich Prokhanov is the conscience of the Patriotic movement in Russia. Because Alexander A. in ’91,’ 92 and 93 said all that two years ago official TV began to say, what many realized only when in Ukraine the civil war was began. Alexander was ahead of his time, and largely thanks to the activities of Prokhanov Patriotic enthusiasm began in Russia, including the creation of the Izborsk club. The credit goes to Alexander Andreyevich Prokhanov. He is the banner of the Izborsk club.

Now, we’re talking about the difficult situation that was in Russia, which was overcome and which is now being overcome. That Russia was able to initially overcome the inner turmoil, before she got the chance to start picking up land and assistance forces these understand the very important truth that we can exist together.

Individually we can only disappear. To Russia provided this help these healthy forces should be. And healthy force is the militia of Donbass. And this is why Russia is helping them.

Here are the same healthy forces should appear and in Ukraine itself. As long as there is not, to us it is very difficult to change the situation there. But I am absolutely convinced that a healthy Pro-Russian forces will appear there. And inevitably the gathering of Russian lands, when all Ukraine and Russia, and Belarus, and Kyrgyzstan, and Kazakhstan and Armenia will meet again in the great Eurasian Association. As it will be called – it
doesn’t matter. It is important to place the fact. It is with one hand. On the other hand we must understand what our enemies and opponents want. I mean, not those bastards that shoot out large and small calibers residential cities. I mean their demiurges who stand behind them, who designed this civil war, which launched a coup in Ukraine. And I speak now not of the Kiev politicians. These politicians only want money and US visa. Here’s what they actually sell their Home. And when they fulfill what they have to work, they run, they leave. And the homeland will remain in a difficult position. I’m talking about those who brought them to power. I’m talking about the forces that guide the political processes in the world.

So, what do they need? If we understand it, we will become more clear what we must do in order to resist them. But their goal is the dismantling of the state as an institution of human society. They believe that we have reached a level where the state is no longer needed, they just interfere. Why would they need it? They need to come to a clearer method of governing the world. Now let’s see what sovereign States still exist. The States that are their tools – the tools of the US and UK. Other States, I mean Western ones, large and small, sovereign States are not. The sign is very simple. These States act against their own interests.

Here’s an example: current situation and civil war in Ukraine. Any sane politician who dependents on Russian gas supplies via Ukraine, just would like to ask Russia to build as soon as possible the bypass pipeline, not to depend on the current risks. But we see that Europe is blocking the construction of gas pipelines, and forcing Gazprom and Europe in a narrow corridor that depend on the benevolence of the American and the Kiev authorities. Suicidal actions: “South stream”, which they were forbidden to build, “Turkish stream”. As soon as it starts to come in some country, there were attempts to destabilize the situation and to exercise pressure on the government, both in Macedonia and Turkey.

What it is, not as a policy to the detriment of the interests of their countries, their people? It means that these States are not sovereign. Now, the only States which make it difficult to implement all these plans, are Russia and China. Yes, there are Belarus, Kazakhstan, but the leaders of these countries understand that if Russia won’t be neither Belarus nor Kazakhstan won’t be too. They alone will not be able to resist this rink.

Russia and China are the root of that problem. So the strike in the first place to apply and for Russia and for China. Here we can see the creation of so-called Islamic state, the terrorist group that amid the ruins of Americans of middle Eastern countries, gaining strength and growing. And the superpower the USA has nothing, ostensibly, to do with it. It can neither destroy this great power, nor things straight. Although once she destroyed the state with a huge army – Iraq, Libya, and now trying to destroy Syria.

We see that the USA and Europe, their ambassadors from OSCE somehow don’t notice the shelling of Donetsk. They don’t see the crimes committed during the civil war. They don’t see the dead children. They don’t want to hear anything. But they can hear any words of Kiev. Even if they are based on nothing other than speculation. Why? Because they want a civil war within Russia. They want a military conflict in which they need to drag Russia. I will say more. I am absolutely convinced that the war here in Donbass, is carried out such brutal methods by the Kiev authorities in order to provoke Russia’s entry into the conflict. This is largely due to the suffering of the civilian population in the Donbas. Because no reasonable explanation for such a policy of waging war on the part of Kyiv. Everything that made the Kiev authorities immediately set up the people of Donbass strongly against them. Even if anyone still doubted it, he stopped
to oscillate once saw what was happening and how civilians are being killed. Therefore, understanding the needs of our enemies, we must understand that we can do and what we should not do. Because it may be just what they want to receive from us.

Summing up my speech, I would like to say that now we are witnessing the first steps of gathering the Russian lands. This process has clearly begun. And today when we were on Saur Tomb, exactly there, in my opinion, Russian spirit returned. Because, earlier Russian spirit was asleep, he got lost in the consumer’s life that we impose. When many of us have forgotten what Russia is, what the Russian spirit is, what is the meaning of existence of our state, which is a unique Russian civilization – then part of our people were able to adopt alien values and to provoke this terrible civil war, which, unfortunately, happens today. But Russian Spirit returned. And the return of this Russian spirit of Russia is obliged to you. For you, dear residents of Donbass, thank you so much!

Recorded by Lily Nichiporchuk