In Kiev it again began to smell by the “Maidan”: the so-called “Revolutionary right-wing forces” decided to take matters into their own hands. Some experts have already hastened to make statements about that is nothing more than another “storm in a teacup”, but let’s not jump to conclusions: the rebels have serious chances for success.

The opinions of skeptics based on the fact that any “Maidan” is impossible without the approval of the “Washington regional Committee”: huge amount of overseas money was invested both previous times in “revolution”. And now think about whether they need such a large crowd at the Goat’s swamp with a long standing in our days: because the situation has changed dramatically.

Both previous times the basis of the “Maidan” were the “office’s hamsters” and the boys-majors with splayed fingers. These people didn’t need any shocks, but they want a bright carnival under the slogan “feel like a creator of history!” Then well-known personalities came to the “Maidan” that to be promoted: they had to get to the section of the pie with very tasty pieces.

Today everything is different: people during the reign of the junta were hungry, and delicious production is not expected; everything edible has spread through the stomachs, and in some places — and cesspool, for example. In this situation, well-fed and famous, hardly anything get: it is easier to see how the toad wins in the struggle of the white and red roses, and then to negotiate with a slippery and bubbly one. This is clearly visible in the leadership of the rebels, which the core constitutes from little-known personalities, which had time and energy to sniff, and find out at the front how much a pound of trouble is.

The rebels are so terrible: they don’t need the extras. Or rather they do, but as human shield and sacred victim. They did not come to hold a meeting: colored adhesive tape “decorates” their sleeves, which is used for their identification in the heat of battle. The ideal speaker is a man of few words “comrade Mauser”: if you give him the word, then the opponent will not get up.
One can only guess how the Ministry of defense of Ukraine “lost” the formation of nests of coup in the hotel “Kozatskiy”: hotel is departmental, and if they had to prevent confusion, it would something to invent. For example, it was necessary to arrange a seminar for young lieutenants, immediately repopulating the building of reliable officers and thereby creating a strong point of counter-revolution. But, alas, this did not happen: the rebels were allowed to rent a conference hall and rooms; no one prevented them to move in. Now the security forces are threatening to drive out the “revolutionaries” of the Maidan from the building, but it is clear to all that this is possible only as a result of brutal fight in the city center, which will inevitably be accompanied with numerous victims and destruction.

Flip the calendar for a couple of years ago, in the days of the overthrow of Yanukovych. The end of February is not only the end of winter and the approaching end of the heating season in Europe, when disruptions in the supply of gas cease to be critical. Therefore, country-transiter can be allowed political turbulence, but with the condition that all “settled down” by the end of spring, or, at worst, by the beginning of autumn.

Now, therefore, the “window” was opened in Ukraine in order to hold the next “revolution”, which will be completed by the desired time, the advent on the political horizon of the new “looking” for gas transit. But if Ukrainian society fails to nominate such, then at some point they will decide about the open introduction in “Independence” Institute of external control. It has now, but at least the view is of the last vestiges of legal capacity in the state, and then the neighbors will not have to ask the opinions of mired in the chaos Ukrainians.

In favor of this speaks the fact that in the summer of last year in Ukraine there were many cases of explosion of the situation: and a scandalous election and the mass protests of farmers, accompanied by over-lappings of highways, riots of the miners from Volhyn’, and even well-known events in Mukachevo. The situation escalated only now that utter confusion reigns in the Verkhovna Rada and the Cabinet of Ministers: apparently its origin is also “postponed” by someone’s a very solid effort.

It is already possible to outline the contours of the “third Maidan”, it will be a small number of participants, but heads will roll right and left. In such a situation to pick up lying under the feet of a central authority — a thankless task: so much better to be a local prince on the model of the chieftain of almost a century ago.

And what about the current revolutionary situation — the coming days will show whether it will be possible to postpone the stabbing, or it will completely unguided.

Alexander Dmytrievsky

In difficult times for the Donbass, 2014 year, musicians from Madrid rap group “Kronika Lirika” did not succumb to false propaganda of their government about the events in the Novorossia, were not afraid of political persecution and become actively involved in charity events in support of the residents of Donbass, organized in Spain. When they were contacted by Lugansk performer in the genre of group-rap Lera MC Val and she offered to write a song together about the events in the Donbass, the Spaniards gladly accepted — wrote the music with Lera and the joint text. So there was the song “Vómitos / Vomiting,” which became a cult album of MC Val “Discontent.”

The editorial office of the magazine “New Land” contact with the Spanish supporters and talked about the further creative plans of the musicians and the situation in Spain.

You have in Spain the situation is very similar to ours. For example, the Basques want to secede or to receive a wide autonomy, which is strongly reminiscent of the events between Novorossia and Ukraine. Do you understand their desire and how to react to the situation in the event of an exacerbation?

-The situation is not exactly the same but yes, we understand their desire to separate from Spain, because we don’t believe in borders or flags, but we understand the desire of not being part of some certain borders or flags. In addition to that, we believe in the self-determination rights of the people.

How did you hear about the war in the Donbass? Whether is there information blockade in relation to our events? How often do the media talk about us and what do they say?

-At the beginning, the info about the war appeared on TV and newspapers very often. Nowadays, it appears more eventually. But, at the beginning and now, all the info in the big media appears manipulated. They don’t mention the slaughters (you have to look for it in alternative media on the internet if you want to know about them), they don’t show anything that could relation Kiev with the NAZIS (they show them as democratic people), they speak about the militia as ProRussian Rebels in a derogatory way, etc, etc… If we know a little bit more about the real situation, is thanks to Mc Val sending us videos and info, and alternative media on the internet, but NO thanks to the mass media.

You participated in several charity concerts in Madrid, where the money was collected to help the residents of Donbass. Have the Spaniards lost the interest to our tragedy?

-Yes, we have participated and collaborated in promote several charity concerts to collect money for different causes: evictions, trials costs, social centers, Palestine, Donbass, etc. A part of the society is still being aware about it, promoting talks, projecting documentaries, or organizing charity concerts for example. In this sectors the slogan “no os olvidéis de Ukrania” (don’t forget Ukraine) keeps in mind. But unfortunately, the majority Spanish society looks like put at a side what is happening there, as in many other places in the world. Nowadays the people, not only in Spain, are only worried about their smartphones, LED TV’s and beautiful cars… Partially maybe, it is as consequence of this lack of information and manipulation that exists. It’s sad.

Do many people in Spain and the EU support Novorossia and understand our situation?

-No, we don’t believe that. We think the people that understand and support it, is a minority. The same minority that still being aware about it we spoke before.

Do you know people who went to Novorossia to join the militia?

-No, we don’t know them personally, but we know the cases.

How do you feel about a sharp the U.S. interference in the politics of the EU? Do you realize that war can touch you?

-We are totally against the interference and intervention by the U.S. in the politics of the E.U. or any country in the world. Nowadays, we are worried about the TTIP for example because will be a front attack to the freedom and rights of the people if finally starts up. It’s purely fucking capitalism.

How many people in your country support the policy of the government with regards to the sanctions against us and against Russia?

-We suppose that more or less the same person, who is interested in the Ukranian situation, is the people that don’t support the sanctions. But we don’t know really good about the sanctions are applied by the Spanish government.

Do they understand those, who support the actions of your government, that because of sanctions they are losing jobs and Russian tourists?

-No, we don’t believe they could think about that.

You have created the group in 2001, it’s a long time. What idea was initially put into your creativity? What has changed in your approach to music and lyrics?

-Yes, lot of years ago now. As much at the beginning as actually, the idea is a group of friends doing what they like to do, and having fun making music. This hasn’t changed, and will not change in the future. It’s true that with the passage of time, the lyrics have become more socials and politics than at the beginning. But definitely is the same idea than in 2001: speak about our ideas, worries, feelings… It’s a way of expression.

How did you hear about Val MC and where did the idea to record a song with her come from? Do you know that the joint track with Kronika Lirika and MC Val is very fond of militia and it is often possible to hear on our streets?

-When we release our demo CD “KL3: Muerte y destrucción” (all our CD’s are demos, because you can find them totally free to download on our website www.kronikalirika.com), we sent it to lot of underground hip-hop websites of different countries. MC Val contacted with us after it because she liked a few of our songs, and we start speaking and sharing opinions and music. We heard her music, and of course we like it also! Her voice is INCREDIBLE and has a great style. We spoke about the possibility of making collaboration, and the idea took shape when our producer Flemen Bassound made “Vómitos”, the beat of the song. We thought “this one is perfect for her voice”, and we show it to her. She liked it and… Vómitos/Pbota was the final result.

We didn’t know about this fact until now, is something new for us. But we are really proud of it! It’s an honor for us to sound on your streets also.

Would you like to give concerts in the Novorossia?

-Yes of course! Everywhere! Where we enjoy the music at the highest level, is onstage. We only have played one time out of Spain, in Belgium, and we remember the experience as one of the best ones in our lives. Novorossia would be really exciting for us also!

MC Val is prohibited in Ukraine. How do you feel about the fact that the entry there is now closed for you?

-Any artistic expression, independently of what kind of expression, that tries to change what is imposed by the force, always will find this kind of prohibitions against itself. It’s a sign that you are doing it ok, because they try to stop you. Maybe now we can’t go to Ukraine or to Donbass because of it, but although they don’t want it, this kind of expressions, including our music, will not be stopped.

Do you plan to continue cooperation with the musicians of Novorossia?

-We could like it of course! For example, we are waiting for another beat that inspired us and Mc Val as much as Vómitos to make another song together, because we have spoken about the idea already.

How do you see the future of Spanish in the global world?

-It looks like that some things are changing here, but we think that even with this changes, the support of Spain to the UE and US won’t change, so if it happens, Spain will be in the middle of the fire (real fire or in restrictions shape) between the big countries for sure… It’s bad for us.

What would you like to convey to your fans in Novorossia?

-We want to thank everyone in Novorossia that heard our songs; we never could imagine that this could happen! We would like to thank so much to MC Val also, because this could not be possible without her. So, thank you so much to all of them. And we would like to send all our support and strength to them to keep resisting the attacks of the fascists. Good luck and health to you!

Interviewed by Vitaly TRETYAKOV

Not so long ago one of the sites trying to give a twisted picture of the reality of what events are happening in Donetsk, broke the article entitled “Intellectual obscurantism”. In it, our magazine is not just abused, and even quoted and cited cover photos and pages. The article has attracted a lot of viewers, and, presumably, well helped popularize of “New Earth”. On behalf of the entire editorial office would like to express my sincere gratitude to the author of the material. But there were, of course, and questions.

The website on which was posted this lampoon with elements of advertising, positioning itself as Donetsk, although certainly in fact all the authors have long left the city and write their papers from somewhere in Kiev (unless, of course, they haven’t called in anti-terrorist operation). Because of in Donetsk and any other city in Novorossia they have nothing to do. Not because of terrible repression, but simply because they disagree with the crystallization of a new state that does not wish to have anything in common with and frankly illegal Nazi Kiev junta. This means that they agree with our opponents. Let’s get the word to them.

“In 1941 the Soviet Union attacked the Ukraine and Germany” — exactly one year ago, on January 8, 2015, Arseniy Yatsenyuk stated on one of German TV channels. Thus, he automatically waived the right to Win, which is a joint effort produced by our grandfathers and great-grandfathers. Moreover, he spoke not from himself, but as a person, which seems to be as a delegated authority of the Ukrainian voters. And hence, too, he put in one row with all great strategists, who were good, and civilized, and technically savvy but war to the Russian people they lost. It is unenviable fate, what to say.

The Germans themselves at that time by their representative Merkel made it clear that the fight with the Donbas and especially with Russia they do not really want. Maybe, of course, will make eventually, but the big desire they have not. And now Frau Merkel in her Munich speech clearly says that “unable to imagine a situation when the delivery of modern equipment to the Ukrainian armed forces compels President Putin to conclude that he cannot prevail in a military conflict”. In another of her speech, she articulates more clearly: “Europe wants to build security together with Russia, not against Russia.”

Maybe it is genetic memory reminds her of the unpleasant prospect of armed clashes with the Russian, and maybe German ratio, woken up by constant exercises of the Russian army and periodic tests of new types of weapons invented by our scientists.

But it’s not only the Germans suddenly came back to reality. And now the venerable conspirator Sarkozy echoed his colleague: “Ukraine has nothing to do in Europe. It must maintain its vocation to be a bridge between Russia and Europe”. And quite seditious sounds from his mouth: “Crimea has chosen Russia, and we can’t him to blame”. Apparently, the former President of France is also known that during the punitive operation against Novorossia already were killed nearly fifty thousand people. And this option seems unattractive.

We, of course, should refrain from sentiments “throw by caps”. The war in the Donbas is as before. The cities of Novorossia are bleeding of civilians killed criminally, at night, on the sly. Gorlovka and Dokuchayevsk, Stakhanov, Donetsk and Lugansk, all subjected to intense shelling. But the fact that to fight for American interests Europe wants less and less, too obvious.

What have chosen our countrymen, our half-brothers, have taken the side of the occupying power, to cast their fate and the lives of their loved ones in the hands of the forces guiding the tanks, “Grad” and “Point U” on the former “south-east of Ukraine” (in fact we never will be it, even if they really asked)? Is it escaping from their cities in favor of political interests, supporting the “Ukrainian”

politicians, which can hardly be called otherwise than by the ghouls? Very sorry, but they chose shame and infamy. They chose the impossibility to return to the bosom of their people. And as you know, a plant severed from the root, drying. Mazepa, for example, in a foreign land was seized by lice. It is clearly. It is exemplary and illustrative. Even the Turks, battered, that sight scared. And our countrymen voluntarily turn in their Homeland a foreign country. They give it to the reproach of the enemy who won’t say “thank you”, and with toothy Hollywood smile will stretch glass beads and Plague blanket.

But any insanity passes, and we sincerely hope that there are in the temporarily occupied territories enough people who have an understanding of Victory the same as our, traditional. It is so, where the Victory of the Russian spirit and Russian weapons lies. We always remember about this Victory and never will give up from it. And all who are with us, with pleasure we will accept.

Artem OLHIN

A new history of Serbia can be characterized in different ways, but one thing is clear – quiet it was not. However, forgive readers for the tautology, there is nothing new here. The country is situated on the border of Catholicism and Orthodoxy, Christianity and Islam, Western and Eastern civilizations, the eternal “bone in the throat” empires that broke on their teeth a lot of great conquerors, it never could boast of stability. If in Serbia it was constant, so that is Orthodoxy and a deep connection with Russia, Russia as a Bastion of hope for people of common faith, who built a house on the junction of major routes of Europe.

In the maelstrom of the modern world, when all is relativized, black and white are constantly swapped, yesterday’s terrorists suddenly become freedom fighters, age of truth and the foundations of the fun eliminated, and faith turns into its opposite, not only Serbs, but many other Nations see Russia as a bulwark of a healthy conservatism and practically the only country that has a material and, above all, spiritual potential, to oppose the wave of the present Satanism in all sides of human life.

Through the prism of these two factors, there is a deep commonality of worldview and historical ties with one hand and threatening to absorb all the wave of liberalism on the other hand, and perceives the people of Serbia what is happening in the middle East. In Serbia they understand that the “Arab spring”, ISIS, provocation with Russian SU-24, the war in Syria and Iraq, the wave of immigrants in Europe, the Kiev Maidan, the war in Novorossia and the NATO expansion to the East are parts of one mosaic, which put our evil friends across the ocean, never minding the fate of countries and peoples, I do not speak – individuals. However, it seems now clear to every reasonable person. Only intentionally can’t help, but notice that democracy is rested or to the borders of Russia, or to the oil fields.

We must say that Serbia is one of the first to come under the heel of a campaign of NATO to the East. In the 90s, when many in Russia believed that with the disappearance of the conflict of capitalist and socialist systems have disappeared and all the geopolitical issues, on the heads of Serbs already rained bombs of NATO, laced with uranium. The West spared no effort trained and supplied arms to the enemies of the Serbs in the wars of the 90-ies, the main blame for them are stacked once again on the Serbs (?!?).Therefore, the behavior of NATO in the conflict with ISIS was not a surprise for us. As no-one in Europe the Serbs know that the US and NATO love to have their “sons of bitches” that they realize their goals. What these hands are often stained with blood, no one cares, because after the mission, former fighter for independence and human rights can be returned to the level of terrorists, or even transferred to the category of enemies of democracy.
As for Turkey, there are not a dozen Serbian Proverbs warn that one cannot trust the Turks, they are unreliable allies, can easily turn into enemies. That the Serbs have learned in their own skin and they studied it too long, for 500 years. In historical retrospect, more recently, the Ottoman Turks burned Serbian monasteries and sold in the slave markets of Istanbul Balkan slaves. It should, however, be noted that the Turks did this not only for fun but also in retaliation for the ongoing uprising: the Serbian people never give up trying to free themselves from the Turkish occupation. But even now, when, apparently, the history of the Turkish conquests in the Balkans is over Turkey and then casts a bloody shadow on the region: we all know about its support for Islamic fundamentalists in Bosnia in the wars of the 90s, and about the support it has generously provided and provides to Albanian separatists in Kosovo. That there is only one Erdogan’s statement made during the official (?!?) visit to the so-called “independent Kosovo”: “Kosovo is Turkey, Turkey is Kosovo”. So, no matter how insane may seem at first glance, the idea of the return of Turkey to the Balkans, this is the think. History does not like the bad students and makes them again to study the old lectures.

From the foregoing it is clear, on whose side the sympathies of the Serbs in the incident with Russian plane in Turkey. For us it is another example of a treacherous stab in the back, received Orthodox from Turks.

Another factor relevant to the issue under consideration and in General is highly relevant for Serbia: expats. The Serbian people, like the Russian, still hurt to watch the suffering of others. And the game organizers of the “great Exodus” of Muslims from prosperous and not quite Muslim countries (among refugees, surprisingly, little or not at all Christians, although ISIS them and pursues the most). And for those who are less exposed to manipulation, the EU has a whip. Serbia does not support the moderate opposition, it did not create al-Qaeda and ISIS, its economy was destroyed and the ecology was destroyed. And yet, in its territory grow the refugee camps and slowly starts to seem (and some of the powers that be have already expressed such ideas openly) that this is a project to change the structure of the population. That is, the destruction of the rebellious Serbia from the inside through assimilation, changing religious and cultural profile of the population.

So now the feelings and comments of the ordinary man in Serbia about Russian air strikes on ISIS can be briefly and aptly expressed by the words: “Finally. Now the Russians can fight them”.
Unfortunately, at the Serbian political elite, standing in power, the situation is exactly the opposite. It’s hard to understand because, like it or not, people at the helm of the country are Serbs. They all saw what happened to country in the 90s, all they know their own history. However, they are leading the country straight into the iron embrace of NATO and the EU. Our government, as before, tries to sit on two chairs: avoiding any statements that would define its attitude to the roles of the parties in the conflict with ISIS and the incident with the downed SU-24, the power of flirting with NATO and the EU, from time to time by sending to the Russian Federation delegation and taking an equally high-ranking delegations from Russia. Like … the delegation from Turkey – mandatory declarations about the “neutrality and development of friendly relations with all.” The pro-western media created an image of Russia as a source of vast, unpredictable and all-destroying military force. People they gently bring up the idea that it’s time to flee under the protection of NATO from a huge, kind, but clumsy and unpredictable Russian bear. If you look at recent events in Montenegro, it is clear that it is dangerous right to declare the Serbian people on the final turn to NATO and the EU. However, we all know about the technologies of change the public opinion, I’m not talking – the falsification of the decision of elections and referenda. It is therefore not enough to rely on common sense and historical tradition. We want the full, large-scale return of Russia to the Balkans. We must remember that, as history shows, the attack on Serbia is almost always a dress rehearsal of war against Russia.

Irina STOJICEVIC

About Russian volunteers fighting in the Donbas, they said from the first days of the conflict. And they really turned out a lot here. Therefore, we easily find for the interview a man who came from there. Contrary to popular Ukrainian media myths he is not a mercenary, and he is not even a native of the Ryazan higher airborne school. In the space Marines and equestrian Buryat Special Forces our interlocutor also did not serve.

He was the usual guy who before the war lived quietly in the city, was educated, participated in the work of the Patriotic movement, collaborated with our colleagues from the Party “Great Motherland”. And then it happened that he joined the ranks of the international brigade who fought in the LPR. For privacy reasons we do not present detailed data about our respondent, leaving in the text only his real name is Daniel. The rest, he tells himself.

— New Earth: We were told that you participated in hostilities and have wounded. Is it so?

— Daniel: Yes, I fought in the Luhansk region. I mean, I had no such plans, but when had practice, went to the city Donetsk of the Rostov region: next there were just leftovers of “Izvarino boiler.” There, I’ve seen people who arrived from the combat zone: with shrapnel wounds and children, and the elderly, and women. Just after this, a few days later, I was in Luhansk, I joined the international brigades. The wound I had received at Lutugino. The exact number I don’t remember, I think, August 29. Can show, but will not be seen… Shrapnel like this already…… and then I was said, “Go home “the three hundredth”. Relax, restores. Then, if you like, will return.” Well, actually, I came back here. I’m first to Luhansk region in Krasny Partizan went, also to help people a little. And now my friends are fighting here in Donetsk. I first, the guests, and then stayed here. And now the girl is there: God willing, we’ll marry.

— A New Earth: Before coming here, how the situation is perceived when looking at it from Russia?

— Daniel: Initially, the feeling was that, in fact, it is genocide. And it does not result from watching TV, because in reality it was still worse. We are engaged in the export of refugees from Lutugino, when there were active battles. So, the machine is full of refugees, we are not in camouflage uniforms took them to the people not to substitute. The only weapon we had, of course, just in case. And there was mortar attack on the cars… Lucky that we hadn’t got… It is normal for Ukrainian side phenomenon, when machine guns fired to the machine with refugees. It is otherwise, as genocide, is there?

— A New Earth: that is, they just fired the car, which was heading from our territory there?

— Daniel: Well, Yes. Then I’m on the level of rumors, of course, I knew that under the Krasny Partizan they shot machine with the miners and on the border they cut out entire families with children. Later happened with their mayor to speak, it is interesting still to know the truth, or not.

He said that it is. “Right Sector” when it appeared there, began the slaughter. This happened around June 2014.

— A New Earth: it is often possible in Russia itself to hear people say, “It’s been going on for too long, we were lay down sanctions, enough already, how many it is possible, let them solve their problems themselves…” Comes out, many people in Russia do not realize that this is a common problem that concerns everyone.

— Daniel: Well, this is the original personality, which if only one seat warm and the stomach full. Not enough Parmesan and the like. There are, of course, but I think they are a minority. May be my social circle is appropriate. In my opinion, the most adequate Russian citizens perceive it as a problem of their country, after all, in Donetsk and also Lugansk Russian people live. I do believe that the Russian people are fully. And even in that part of Ukraine, where we are under attack, there are those who support the idea of Novorossia.

— A New Earth: And as a party to the hostilities, had to communicate with their fighters who were captured by us?

— Daniel: Yes, of course.

— A New Earth: And what do they say? How are they here? Why have you come to fight?

— Daniel: Many were made. It was a normal phenomenon. I don’t remember what the wave of the call was, but we were sorry fighters of AFU even. They were forced. They are doing their orders, but they have no desire to fight.

— A New Earth: So really the ideological fighters of the Ukrainian nationalists you did not get?

— Daniel: Were these. They safely passed and were sent “where necessary to”. I don’t know what it was then. But the ideas were. They are basically from “Aidar” come across; they insisted that they came to kill us. Later they, however, terrified sitting. And too them it would be a pity, but if they are not did with people…

All is clear, it’s been brainwashed for many in Ukraine. Who knows how they might have been, if it wasn’t such an information campaign, which resulted in all Russians for their enemies, and in the Donbas. But war is a cruel thing.

— A new Earth: How would you describe the mood of the people who go into the militia, and now the army of the DPR?

— Daniel: To defend the Donetsk People’s Republic. To defend ideas those were from the beginning of the Russian spring. To throw these ones away, that there was no firing. Of course, there are people who go from despair. Well, it is clear why — for revenge.

But to the soldiers of AFU, which were captured, but not to the punitive battalions, the ratio is normal. We spoke calmly. It was a feeling that in captivity they are much better. And don’t have to die, and the food is better than there.

— A New Earth: And how did prisoners evaluate the Ukrainian government that sent them to war?

— Daniel: They said they came to fight with the Russian army. I invited them to discuss this point. Say, here is our international team. There is a German, and a Frenchman, and Englishman, and an American. How can that be the Russian army? There are even their fellow Ukrainians. It is impossible to name the Russian army. The question is: what are you doing here? Do you are fighting with yours? They sit and think: “But still is anywhere the Russian army?” I tell them: “Well, there is in Russia somewhere”. That is, they honestly believe what they sent to war with Russia. They believe that Russia’s fault, Putin’s fault. They all speak Russian. That was for me amazing.

— New Earth: As someone who saw the war in the Donbas not on TV but in real life, what would you like to say to the citizens of Russia?

— Daniel: I wish you all to keep patience. Not to pay attention to information provocations against Donbas. Because of there are our brothers.

You need to collect will power and support people whenever possible. If not, then at least by the word. After all, the same civil war, as now in the Donbas, “partners” with the West prepared for us in Russia. So do not think that they are different people and different problems. All is one actually.

And for citizens of Ukraine I want to say that they have no enemies. And there were not people who were going to go to Lvov “to wet” someone. The people here are just defending their land from what they are trying to impose.

talked
Lily NICHIPORCHUK

Information war is conducted not only in the global network and on the pages of Newspapers. In the end it always takes place in the real world, because of the “theoretical” perception of an idea to its practical embodiment is only one step.

In order to better understand the laws of development “about football” genre, the editor of “New Earth” met with one of the former Donetsk “ultras”. About how this movement was conceived in terms of Donbass, it became a purely “Ukrainian” and what ultimately led to – read this article. For security of our respondent “New Earth” does not publish his name.

— Artem Olhin: please tell me when did football hooliganism emerge as a decorated movement before it appeared?

– Respondent: football movement emerged in the early 1980s. It happened in England on the basis of the skinhead subculture (from the English skinhead – shaved head).

— A. O.: It turns out that the skinhead movement has become a breeding ground for the emergence of football hooliganism?

– Respondent: Yes.

— A. O.: Are these identical things? Is it required in the modern world, a skinhead is a soccer hooligan, and Vice versa, if a football hooligan is a skinhead?

— Respondent: In the modern world, such a thing as the skinhead is already mostly gone. Many people do not call themselves skinheads, and it started from there. But they have ceased to manifest in this form, anywhere there are words and names associated with that era. Roughly speaking, it so happened that at some point the guys began to consolidate against a certain nation, well as in England for example, against the visiting migrants, who supposedly took their jobs.

And over time, a large, strongly customized movement began out of control; the skins did everything they wanted. Therefore it was necessary to convince them of some idea, to consolidate in one direction. The idea for this was football, “defending the honor of their team.” By the way, football is not in vain chosen because all historians say that in England it was invented.

— A. O.: So was it considered so: here’s to you, the indigenous people of your national idea?

— Respondent: Yes.

— A. O.: And how football hooliganism appeared at us here, we are not England?

— Respondent: the fact that it’s very quickly spread around the world. First, just like fashionable within view of youth culture.

— A. O.: If it arose simultaneously all over the world and beginning to spread rapidly, can we say that the process was artificially started? Or was it as spontaneous natural phenomenon?

— Respondent: There are different theories. Not quite simultaneously, it extended, in England started to settle down first, there was a lot of people who supported it. After five or six years the process has become a disaster in Britain, began to appear books, movies and everything else. The first thing that came to us it was a few movies.

Before that we guys just went to the stadium. Yes, there were some roughly grater, fights between different clubs, but it’s more like a “heat lightning” and people’s fun “wall to wall”.But when it began to emerge movies, then this segment of the youth decided – it’s mine. The most famous films – are “The Football Factory” and “Green Street”.One of them was shot by the company «Discovery», to show football hooliganism as a negative phenomenon. But when the film came to us, all decided the other way around, that’s not bad, but very good. As often happens with subcultures, among other things.

— A.O.: Before 2008 Ultras in Donetsk was not, as such. How did they begin to appear here?

— Respondent: Yes, that’s right. Roughly speaking, it triggered the same mechanism as in England. There was a very developed Russian skinhead movement. And the Ultras were based on them; with they once were pro-Ukrainian organizations: “Patriot of Ukraine”, “Trident”. On the fan sectors of the stadium began to appear people who are lured to their side. It all started with the “basics” of fans who have had an indisputable authority in our circles, or children, which could lead for a large number of other young guys.

I think it is not necessary to explain what and how they are lured to them. NLP and the money have not been canceled. Thus they enticed from the “Russian” skinheads to “Ukrainian”. We once these guys asked, how is it that we’re standing back to back, you were Russian, and became “Ukrainians”. And in response: well, as there loot, they have order there, I’ll go to them.

As the guys changed the idea, it’s a very interesting question, but in fact it turned out that 80% of them have moved in the “Trident”, in the “Patriot of Ukraine” and even in a number of organizations. After this process of Ukrainianization has been launched for all who remained, all those who could continue to build here Russian movement. These people, they began to intimidate, came to direct violence. Then they have openly begun to carry out “shares” (scheduled fights or attacks) and torchlight processions. And local authorities, of course, this did not interfere. And when we went to the contraction, we tried to prevent this, we have arrested. Starting from the time of Yushchenko security forces and civil authorities of Ukrainian openly kept Nazis, it was a golden time for them.

It was at this point for a basis was taken the same as in England: their football movement. It is convenient to control, because each club, sort of like the in crowd, but the idea they have one, common. In England the hooligans believed that in the first place should be not even mother and father, but the country. It turns out that you can’t be ultras in England and being a patriot of France. So here it is imposed on local people “Ukrainian question”.

– A.O.: That is, if you’re sick of the Ukrainian team, you must be a Ukrainian nationalist?

– Respondent: Yes, definitely.

– A.O.: Do I understand correctly that turns a mechanism such that the first radical guys went to the sector, then it began to coalesce with the skinhead culture, and then these same sectors were recruiters from nationalist organizations and the process is spun?

– Respondent: Yeah.

– A.O.: And how long did it take the transformation of ordinary hooligans to ideological Ukrainian nationalists? How quickly it happened and what mechanisms were used for this purpose? Besides the money, what attracted more than?

– Respondent: The process itself was not very long, about a year. We must pay tribute, as though it may sound; in terms of the propaganda they have all been much delivered. I understand they have this very long prepared to break us here, maybe right after the collapse of the Union since the mid-nineties. And they all turned out.

Mechanisms were quite different from money to intimidation. Most of all they came to youth. It is easier to draw: come to us, we cool, cool, look how much we have flags, we have some fireworks… And the youth went there. Moreover, it is good to pass on their city in a crowd of like-minded people. Man considers himself more than cool, he is trendy, good and everything’s great at it. Changing point of view on what is family: his mother does not understand, the father does not understand, but these guys — they are now his family. Because not only they spend time together, playing football and do “about football” together, they also fight with other fans. This is a good mechanism of cohesion. And the more time a person spends in a way the more he gets the feeling that this is his real family. But in the end like the mafia in Chicago: get out of the family you can only when you are killed.

– A.O.: Is that a blood tied things – together they commit crimes?

– Respondent: Yes, exactly.

– A.O.: Do I understand correctly that the reason your way out of the ultras movement was exactly that was not left Russian hooligans and the movement turned into a fully Ukrainian?

– Respondent: Yeah.

— A.O.: The people who went to the Ukrainian ultras movement, do they ask questions themselves, was any kind reflection? For example, have you ever wondered that the very serious role of the same soccer hooligans played in the overthrow of Milosevic in Serbia? Did they understand that they would be used in this way in a few years on the Maidan, was this awareness?

— Respondent: No, they still don’t understand it. Just as the Internet can correspond with a participant of the Maidan, to ask him some things. And what he will answer, we are not absolutely clear — absolutely brain washed. The same thing we have those guys asked, we’re like friends. But I have asked and received some answers sky-high, some, roughly speaking, nonsense, otherwise I can’t say. It all continues, you can verify this by speaking with a Ukrainian nationalist from Kharkov or any other city. Talk and ask him why he became a Ukrainian nationalist? He has not a logical answer.

— A.O.: In your opinion, what percentage of football hooligans, who lived in Donetsk and were active, later took part in the first events on the Maidan, and then in punitive operations against the Donbass, which for some reason called “ATO”?

— Respondent: A very large number of people; it can be 70-80%, they are still there are many even headed “territorial battalions” – “Dnepr”, “Donbass”.That is, how to use them and continue to use. Finally, it became clear that such a move ultras, on May, 2 when people were burned in Odessa. After all, who got there? There fans arrived from Kharkov, from Kiev, more from somewhere. They wound up the crowd, they directed traffic. In principle, these same people wound up maidan.

— – A.O.: On Maidan against the “Berkut” were the ultras?

— – Respondent: Yes, the ultras. It is possible to track each video interview you can see the way it was. You can just say that all of this was created and, therefore, invested so much money in it.

— A.O.: Is that entirely a man-made process?

— Respondent: Yes, absolutely, it is.

— A.O.: In connection with this, what to expect now in Russia, where there are a very large number of different “companies” (associations of ultras) and other similar structures?

— – Respondent: What we see in Russia today, the people who come to the “Russian March” – first of all, they believe that they are “the most Russian”. Therefore, they raise the imperial banners. However, they believe that Putin – is bad. There is now a split. There are ultras, which are hostile to the Novorossia. And there are, on the contrary, parts of the ultras that are fighting, to the militia came. These are series of fans of “Zenith”, from “Spartacus”, from other clubs.

But be that as it may, the backbone of who shouts, supported Ukrainian Nazis, but it goes to the Russian marches, and which, as we have seen in the Bolotnaya out a few years ago – a huge number of young and determined people. The Russian leadership can still muster a problem with them, obviously.

However, there are guys who think that Russia is different. Worldwide ultras movement was getting out of control are the ideological splits. Just as in Ukraine, are on opposite sides, and in Italy and Spain. Rather, it can lead to certain “hot” effects.

— A.O.: Is this split of football clubs or on this principle, as people tend to think about what was happening?

— Respondent: As football clubs are no partitions. You have to fight for the honor of the club, for the city, if you come to hurt another country – for your national team, and then all the bullies become one. But here the differences are already other plans. Maybe she Novorossia will be eventually turning point for them, maybe the Russian

It’s been two years since mass insanity on the Maidan. Since then this word became recognizable and a household name. It’s maybe infinite or rally, or something happening, whether aggressive theatre of the absurd. It’s burning tires. Anti-Russian slogans and threats turned into reality in Mariupol and Odessa. “Who are not jumping — that is moskal”, “Moskals on knives” scene with burning soldiers of “Berkut”, leafless whole world — all this ideological Ukrainian will explain to you how the required attributes of the struggle for social justice and a European future and the country’s independence. It is not clear why any of the above in the end did not appear. It became evident that the project “Ukraine”, launched about a hundred and fifty years ago is collapsing. From it began to depart the territory and this process obviously will continue. More clearly a blatant lack of independence of the project manifested its controllability and dependence from the United States. And in the end another issue was resolved – that we are the enemy now. This is to the extent that to continue to live in one country is impossible. “We will never be brothers” — these lines were written by believers that “Ukraine is not Russia”, Kiev residents write them to their blood relatives in Moscow, Donetsk and Rostov. They forgot that we have always been one nation. The worst thing is that the funds for the healing of the schism yet. But to understand where it comes from, it can and should be. At the same time it becomes clear why in the hands of Ukrainian nationalists everything turns to dust.

Made in Empire

The paradox is that even the traitors of Russia, who took part in the launch of the February revolution of 1917, had Imperial consciousness. How else to explain that many of the members of the Provisional government, deliberately worked to weaken their country, decided not to recognize the autonomy of Ukraine, enshrined in the first three universals of the Central Rada. And even more so Imperial was the consciousness of the Bolsheviks, who in response to the emergence of the Ukrainian national Republic moved the capital to Kharkov and declared an ultimatum to Hrushevsky and his colleagues – to let the Little Russians liberties in the form of autonomy, no one was going. Even the ancestors of the modern Ukrainian Nazis to encroach on something more serious than autonomy within the Empire did not dare. It turns out that all participants in the process were products of their time, although formally the Russian Empire and the liberals, and socialists and Ukrainian nationalists disapproved, moreover, fought against it. But it was their flesh and blood, in thought and action regardless of whether they wanted it or not.

As a result it turned out that the biased policy of the West (and abroad in varying degrees, was up to the revolutionaries) were obtained from their supervisors the order to destabilize the situation and still could not eradicate the Empire in their “political style”. Many survivors of the White Guards in exile quickly realized this. And during the Great Patriotic war they collaborated with seemingly alien to Soviet intelligence. Just because their country was at war, and no other Russian intelligence was not. Hence the first conclusion is that for Russian people effectively began to work against their country need that they ceased to consider themselves Russian. On the territory of modern Ukraine, this method proved just fine.

Great dream — to destroy Russia

Before the war for independence of Novorossia in Donetsk there were many people with radical Ukrainian sentiments. Someone accepted the opinion because it was easier to build a career. But they were the real ideological characters. I asked one of these nationalists: “Do you understand that Ukraine is needed only as an anti-Russia? What if, God forbid you ever get what you seek, your country will become worthless and it will disassemble for parts by neighbors?” The source said: “Yes, I understand that. But you don’t understand what a great dream — to destroy Russia”. It’s so. But it’s honestly, what I can say.

This explains why more than a year of its existence, the Ukrainian Central Rada failed to do anything constructive. No economy, no army, no real control over them have fallen into the hands of the territory at Hrushevsky, Vynnychenko and other “officials” was not. But there were parades, rallies, endless meetings, and ranting. The same trend was showed later and by Petliura. The same thing, you need to put, waits and modern junta, holed in Kiev. Under these conditions, real independence is just ridiculous. It turns out that Ukraine never had it and never will have it. But this is not surprising, because independence means a constructive program of action, constructive goal desired by the people. And where did all this come from, if the main dream is to have a Russian neighbor’s cow is dead?

Let’s not forget that the first Ukrainian “independence” was nothing more than a German protectorate. And it collapsed immediately after the withdrawal of German troops from the territory. General Hoffmann, who headed the German delegation at the negotiations in Brest-Litovsk, did not hesitate said: “Ukraine is the work of my hands, but not the fruit of conscious will of the Russian people. I have created Ukraine to make peace with at least part of Russia”. The Bolsheviks were forced to sign the Brest peace, but from the very beginning regarded it simply as a temporary assignment. So, the temporary assignment was the “independent Ukraine” too. It is interesting how cyclical history. Recent Minsk agreements signed by the DPR and the LPR, by their terms are very similar to the Brest peace. And they, too, no more than a temporary measure.

Thus, Ukraine emerged as a result of weakening Russia on the international arena. It speaks eloquently about it and the speed with which the “independence” was recognized by Western countries. But to Ukrainian Frankenstein appeared it needed ready concepts. And they were.

Ukraine-Russia: from theory to practice

In the modern world in order to train society to varying thoughts never act directly. It is softly at first, slowly one idea or another is throwing in an entertaining, easy format. For example, when the west there was a need to legalize sodomy in every Hollywood movie were quite nice buggers. And now it is hard to find at least one “masterpiece”, which did not involve same-sex perverts. Some call this the “Overton window”, someone – “escalator of principle”, but the essence remains the same. If you want to break a taboo or to implement a certain idea, proceed gently and systematically. And you’ll get everything.

In the early twentieth century, even the residents of Galicia did not consider themselves Ukrainians. It was self – Rusin, which points directly to the identity of the Russian population. Closer to the East men at all just considered themselves Russian. Neither Austria-Hungary nor Germany, whose task was to create a new concept and the dismemberment of the Russian world, this situation is untenable. But right to declare the same to the inhabitants of Galicia, which is now to be Russian, is impossible, it was impossible. They needed a workaround.

For this purpose were used Hrushevsky desk concepts. It was he who in his multivolume work substantiated and introduced a compromise term “Ukraine-Russia”. As if still not entirely Ukraine, but not Russia. Just it they need. For him even a special Department was opened in Lvov University, so important was the stuffing of the concept “we are not Russia.” Of course, Hrushevsky was not alone. There were other, more radical designs, for example, the developer of Ukrainian integral nationalism Dmytro Dontsov. But the role of Mikhail Gorbachev in undermining Russian identity cannot be underestimated. Acknowledged these achievements and the Tsar’s secret police — in 1914 Hrushevsky was arrested in Kyiv as the Austro-Hungarian agent and sent into exile. However, under the patronage Shakhmatov from Simbirsk him soon enough let go to Kazan and then to Moscow leniency toward political opponents in tsarist Russia met often and to good, as we know, not brought. Well, after the revolution of 1917 Hrushevsky became one of the leaders of the Ukrainian project. Short-lived, but it was not necessary. Had to sow the dragon’s teeth — anti-Russian concept which, as we have seen, continues to bear its bitter fruit to this day.

It is of interest that allegedly hostile to the Bolsheviks “the first President” of the UNR lived quietly in the USSR until 1934 and died in Kislovodsk, having the status of academician. Simply put, not too much was damaged. However, because of the author of the second Ukrainian project belonged to the Bolsheviks, it was implemented in the form of a socialist Republic. Otherwise, the word “Ukraine” would have remained the property of the scientist’s offices. But that’s another story.

Artem OL’HIN

Revolution which is associated with the development of network technologies has changed the speed at which information gave the opportunity to almost every witness of an event to talk about what happened to millions of people on the planet at times faster professional press. It has created a variety of malicious events, and among them there are numerous provocations in computer networks to virtual communication platforms of users.

Today speech will go about their origin in the Russian segment of the World Wide Web that took place a couple decades ago and coincided with the beginning of the network of technological revolution in the post-Soviet space. Advance I bring the readers of the magazine, which unites advocates of culture of the Russian language, apologize for the fact that I was forced to quote very vulgar, and often outright base, the layers of verbal heritage of the era of virtual reality: the roots of such unsightly things you need to know, no matter how vile they may be.

The Era Of FidoNet

Let’s start with a review what was consisted the network technology in the second half of “dashing nineties”: not all of our contemporaries have performance about this. A typical personal computer of those years was weaker than even the simplest modern smartphone: most often it consisted of a 486 IBM processor or the first “Intel Pentium”; it had a hard disk with capacity of up to five hundred megabytes, meager memory, as a memorable portable device was used three – and five-inch floppy disks, and laser drives were considered a luxury. Dedicated cable line could afford mainly companies and organizations, and individual users connected to networks using modem, which was connected to the input of an ordinary desktop telephone: the data rate was disappointingly low, and the number of dropouts was huge. Therefore, for reliability when you need to transport large amounts of information it was easier to go to the owner of the other computer with a box of diskettes or a hard drive: in people, this practice has been ironic called “floppy-net.”

So common now the Internet had not differ democratic character of prices and quality of service, that’s why popular was the alternative — the amateur FidoNet network, or simply “Fido”. It was a non-profit, non-convenience (information was sent mostly at night), was characterized with extremely low-bandwidth (the maximum amount of messages — only eight kilobytes!), and somewhere at the turn of 2004-05 quickly left the scene in the CIS, leaving the memory of the author of these lines intricate room 2:4652/13.1 — I was known with it in echo-conference — a kind of analogues of modern Internet-forums and social networks. Relaying echo-mail areas to the World Wide Web began only in 2000, so huge amounts of information in earlier years irretrievably lost, and now to regain such an interesting and important for the history data we can only on the memories of their participants.

FidoNet network was tied to quite some people: the users, who called themselves “fidonets” were few, and even in such megacities as Donetsk, could know each other in person: to this contributed the tradition of meetings on certain days, accompanied by beer drinking, which, among other things, was considered a universal “currency” in the community. The location of the subscriber was calculated by the following algorithm: the first digit meant the continent, 2 is Europe. The following four figures — the country, region and locality: 4652 — Ukraine (figures 46), Donetsk region, city Makeevka with surrounding areas (figures 52). Follow-up code 13.1 assigned to the owners of the distribution site (they most often were employees of the computer centers of enterprises to the budget which were laid large expenses for long-distance communication) and receiving station: a community member was obliged to inform his colleagues about phone number to which the modem is connected, and this information within the network was considered to be open. Therefore, to find and punish the author of the malicious messages was not difficult, this was facilitated by the fact that to destroy sent in the network was simply impossible: it is known a case where one owner with too rich a sense of humor, after the events of the 11th of September, 2001 on the margins of one of echo-conference expressed a desire to purchase the car of RDX. The next morning, “the joker” gave an explanation of the right keepers, and sometime later — appeared with a grim face to the savings Bank to pay substantial fines for violation of the public peace discharged him by formidable Themis. In “Fido” we had a very peculiar culture of network provocations: it was necessary to be able not only to make daring escapades, but also to avoid the liability.

Phimosis brain

Almost immediately after the appearance of a network FidoNet in the former USSR had any grouping of computer hooligans. A virtual “hangout” for the most inveterate bullies and bad-speakers became echo-conference with a name that speaks for itself — HERE.EVERYBODY.SHIT (abbreviated HES): “Heses” marked the beginning of the current wave of clogging of the Russian language by all kinds of distortions of vocabulary. In particular, their “exercises” at a later time contributed to the emergence of the so-called “language of riffraff”, as well as other forms of verbal garbage. As for behavior, “Heses” were considered relatively harmless, as did “boxing by correspondence” exclusively in their environment, and beyond violent temper did not show. Their ideology this gobbledygook of virtual worlds has not worked out: however, on what high matters think Gopniks? Much worse were the “kaschenyts” parties of echo-conference SU.KASCHENKO.LOCAL (in common parlance — “Kaschenka” or SKL): according to the testimony of a number of sources, this close-knit and aggressive group of provocateurs, pretending to be a inhabitants quite clear clinic, was established in 1998 in the Moscow suburb Podolsk. It is based on oddly enough, who was not beginners, but participants with considerable experience in using network and great authority, many of whom lived in Moscow, Kiev, Kharkov and St. Petersburg. Therefore, there is reason to believe that the movement “Kaschenka” was not spontaneously, as it might seem at first glance, and purposefully it was formed for the sake of someone else’s interests. “Kaschenyts” have created their own jargon, which is called the “kaschrit”: to the origin of the term we will return. People that were not related to network of hooligan community were called “Boklan” or “patyent” (narrative forms of “cormorant” and “patient”): approximately the same value has the word “boob” in criminals. Dehumanization of enemies groups was carried out by setting a very objectionable kind of diagnosis of “phimosis brain”: say, the person who rejects “Kaschenyts’” ideals is so stupid that he is not worthy to be in fido-movement. Organization of riots in echo-conference was called “becoming Kaschenyt”, a massive provocation against a particular individual — “baiting”, and its purpose was “life-giving euthanasia” form of exclusion from participation in the network, and sometimes with more serious consequences, such as problems with the law. The most resonant stories about “baiting” and “becoming Kaschenyt” was “epic” called “Shushpanishady”: its similarity to a prison could be considered “novels”, which tells about the most virtuoso raids and thefts.

“Kaschenyts” had a well-developed methodology of fomenting conflict. Here is an extract from their “Manifesto”, published on the not current site www.kaschenko.ru:

“…in yellow and sports Newspapers, eclipsed in the brains of Baklans cheap detective stories and action movies, hardly can be found something worthwhile. The more they degrade, the easier to manage, the easier it is to use them. Continuing to analyze the facts of their
events, we can deduce some formula of conduct, which even a superficial mastery of the knowledge, producing tangible success in its own line:
1. Require justification even of the smallest trifles, sometimes not paying attention to the main subject. Even if such justification were obtained, distort them, or doubts, telling me that it’s actually not so that it dies and misconceptions. Keep in doubt the competence of opponents in the eyes of others;
2. Deliberately confuse the names of the screamers and phrases, later stating that nonsense has no specific authorship, it is the product of narrow-mindedness and misconceptions. Say, therefore, speaking all nonsense are for you faceless, and you can sometimes be confused, or make a mistake in their names, because too much garbage in my head to hold to anything;
3. At the same time exalt moderators and owners of places of “Kaschenka”. Soon they will stop the shouters;
4. Don’t waste time on responses to large, really incriminating you posts. Just reseat in the spirit of “barely read until the middle of this nonsense, I doubt that someone else was able to overcome this to a greater extent”;
5. Play on the feelings of the crowd; it doesn’t like being put in a stupid light. And when the shouter will be convict, the crowd itself shall devour him;
6. Don’t be afraid to arrange scandals. But try to do it by proxy;
7. Stick the labels and stick to them persistently. Catch in anti-kaschenka, that the opponent is arguing with you just because of the fact that you kaschenyt, not understand the subject, and thereby rolls down to the point of absurdity.
8. Disputes also frequently used expressions a reputable for kaschenyts personalities. The priority is to pay the powers that be. Subsequently underline that the opponent even the words of the moderators and administrators questioned…”

The process of provocation was developed according to the following pattern: first, “kaschenyts” subscribe to echo-conference, and the first few weeks were very decent, sometimes even fawning before the moderators. During this time they either looked after future victim (in this role most often picked up the most active and emotional debate), or thought provoking theme. It was put special requirements: theme is definitely sharp, and the subject of the dispute should not have a unique solution. Then followed a throw-in in the forum, inciting the conflict of the text and addressed to the interlocutors were sent a defiant message-the stupid content. “Kaschenyts” were real network raiders: in case of a successful action of “kaschens” echo-conference either got under control or at least influence, or fell into decay and ceased to exist. Favorite method of “Kaschenyts” was accusing the opponent of anti-Semitism, and it’s worth sharing: tested in those days methods today constitute the technological basis of discrediting the members of the Russian Patriotic movement. For example, in echo-conference dedicated to rock music, sent the following message: “Decl — Mozart of modern times, his dreads — the Passover of our time, and your Viktor Tsoi compared to him is a complete jerk!” Here provocateur played on a “fifth column” of the then popular rap artist and his love of demonic potion, and also in variety style, clearly not the theme of the forum. Rockers were immediately rushed to defend their idol, the answer to that get a replica of ape “Kaschenyts”: “pochemu BU still anti-Semitic? Yes as VI is mousethe goimg’it?” (Arrative forms of phrases: “why are you an anti — Semite? How can you say that?”) Further provocateurs sent out threads of complaints on their victims in all instances, and not only fido-net: hurt that several of my friends. The aim escapades was considered to be reached if provoked were deprived of access to echo-conference, or excluded from the network FidoNet: “Kaschenyts” jargon issued by the forum administration severe punishment was called “sending in gazenvagen” or “a real
furnace of Localhost” — there is cynical speculation around the topic of the Holocaust. By the way, these provocations originated the popular Internet meme “In gazenvagen, zhyvotnoe!” and “Gftopk!”
The provocation was exposed not only to ordinary Internet users, but also public persona. There was a case when “Kaschenyts” organized “persecution” against popular science fiction writer Sergey Lukyanenko. History has not preserved the true motives of the organizers of the antics, which, perhaps, someone even stood, but the answer of the author “Night watch”, succinct and full of malice — “TYCHEM BU still th avice of paysatela?” (Why are you all still Herbs of the writer?) — It was included in the anthology folklore network. The hooligans realized that the victim is too tough, and preferred to retire before it is too late.

The spiral of history

Not to say that “Kaschenyts” was all-powerful: very much depended on the owners of network nodes, defining the policy in a given region. For example, in Kiev almost all the nodes were under the authority of the representatives of the aforementioned groups that ran everything and all. In Donetsk — the exact opposite: small “Kaschenyts’” echo-conferences were available as “read-only”, and the slightest complicity with provocateurs were punished immediately by the presentation of “the wolf ticket” guilty.

Another method of dealing with troublemakers of network was laid in the very structure of FidoNet, which was built on the hierarchical principle. Full membership in the community was started from the owner level distribution node and above the rights of ordinary users to a minimum: it is easily possible to cut off subversive individuals in the grassroots level. In addition, the nodes also have different status: there were those who only kept in touch with end users and logistics centers that passes through the flow of correspondence: the route of the communication it is stated in available to view each line of service information. Therefore, the administrator of a higher level could make a strong-willed decision to redirect logistics channels and nodes, from which came a provocative message or completely overlap access to individual target, or they block outgoing correspondence. To restore order to a lot helped by the fact that the community was widely practiced collective, not individual, responsibility: for the wrongdoing of one subscriber was punished in full not only grass-roots distribution hub, but also a parent.

Sunset of “Kaschenyts” started simultaneously with the decline of the FidoNet network that does not compete with the rising power of the World Wide Web: there is virtual space, no longer tied to specific individuals and geographic coordinates. As a consequence there was no need to enough high-tech provocations interlocutors: it is possible to create any number of network twins, and successfully to mask your location. There are more rudeness and arrogance in dealing with opponents: pack of hyenas’ does not need courage of lion or cunning of Fox.

However, worked out by the group practice provided the basis for a provocative new technology. Kiev “Kaschenyts” actively supported “orange revolution”, becoming her “sitting guard”: however, it is worth noting that ten years ago this role was not as substantial as in the days of the “euromaidan” due to insufficient level of computerization. However, they very successfully fought against the opponents of the “orangists”, mostly by discrediting them.

Going to Internet community fidoers former mobs were a kind of teachers neo Bandera propagandists. Re-read the “Manifesto” of the group, and compare its provisions with the style of communication of the Ukrainian nationalists with their opponents on the forums: the principles are the same. Dehumanization of opponents that actually evolved the way the founders of provocations in virtual reality and not a dream: the authors of the terms “jackets”, “Colorada”, “separatists” have had good “school”. And technology be placed on network sites do not share all their views by Ukrainophobic people with the subsequent denunciations in the security service of Ukraine to Bandera is also not from the sky down: remember how “Kaschenyts” at the time, skillfully played on the Jewish question. It took the experience of taking control of the forums by organizing mass acts of provocation.

History, as we know, develops in a spiral: FidoNet actually became its property, but the concept is the reference to the real personalities, has regained popularity in the form of social networks and blogs. Today, many sites allow commenting on published materials by authorization of the social networks, many popular services have started to practice a confirmation of registration via a mobile connection (in the majority of countries it services are not anonymous), and Facebook, Instagramm and Foursquare use geo-information applications to determine the user’s location. The trend is that sites with the possibility of concealing the identity of the author and are replacing it with virtual characters lose old weight: this is, for example, happened to classic Internet forums, whose main audience now consists of representatives of earlier generations of users of the world wide web. Yes, the chance of destroying incriminating information is also minimized: the blurred from the page, the message often becomes inaccessible to the eye, but is saved on the server.

Consequently, all of us expect a revival of interest in the arts network of the provocations of the past. Tough pressure on the opponent doesn’t give such results as five years ago: get rid of climbing on your page of the cad one touch of a button, therefore, you need more subtle and sophisticated methods. Bullies will again have to ingratiate themselves and to dissemble before put in all their destructive “arsenals”.

PS. Communication with the “Kaschenyts” in FidoNet has made me and many of my fellow of community the habit to be during a stormy debate restraint in judgments and underlined politeness in that you obviously are not impressed. The first is a severe need where the words can be used against those who have expressed them. And politeness takes cities…

Alexander Dmitrievskiy

From the editor
The recent events clearly demonstrated that intelligent, honest and brave people are everywhere. Especially nice to see representatives seem to be as hostile to us Westerners who actually understand what is happening and not afraid to talk about it.

Recently, Donetsk was visited by the author of the book “Maidan: the history of the genocide of the people of the South-East of Ukraine”, published in Italy. And it turned out that, despite some minor discrepancies in terminology, the overall situation, we see the same. This means that in the struggle for a more just, multipolar world, all is not lost.

With great pleasure we offer to our readers a transcript of the speech Max Bonelli in Donetsk Republican library named after N.K.Krupskaya and his answers to questions from the audience.

Max Bonelli: I decided to write a book after what happened in Odessa in “the House of trade unions” and then there were so many videos on this subject on the Internet. I although am not a writer by profession. But I thought it important to create this book and to show what is actually happening here, in the South-East of former Ukraine: the repression and genocide of the Russians.

The book covers the period from Kiev events in November, 2014 and up to the referendum, which was held here in the Donbas, for independence. The main goal of this book is to convey to the Italians what is really going on here, to show my countrymen that without truth there is no democracy. After all, the media and the government in our country is not coverage of the events in which, for example, in Odessa killed dozens of people. It turns out that my state supports those Nazis. And I as the author ask the question to the people: “Why can’t we tell the truth?” And the answer is very simple: “At the moment we are under the occupation of the USA. They decide for us.” And censorship on their part is so strong that it even the major media may not speak the truth.

So I used his book as an opportunity to highlight the opinion of the people of Donbas. They are people, who won their freedom. I brought the point of view of many people who live here, wrote about what they think. There is a lot of such material, because this is my sixth trip here in the Donbas. In parallel, I led the view of nationalists from Ukraine. They say they want to be independent from Russia. But now they give their independence to the United States and it’s obvious.

One part of the book reveals how the Italian media wrote about the events after the coup in Kiev. Almost all European media, as well as our Italian, justified everything that happened. I specifically cited more than 200 fragments of articles, links to online videos about all the main events and how they were covered. It is interesting to note how many of these videos that I collected, were removed from social networks and the Internet, because the media of Ukraine and the USA decided that it’s not good propaganda. For example, there is a video called “How to kill the Coloradas in Odessa”, there you can see the corpses of burnt people in the “House of trade unions”. This same video was removed a few days later. I was able to preserve some of these commercials. One of them is a video where people throw themselves from the windows of the “House of unions”, and the Ukrainian Nazis are killing them. We spent a lot of time to run back to this information in social networks so that people could see the truth – what actually happened.

Another objective is to show how the US is trying to set people against each other. Today they want to oppose the Ukrainian and Russian peoples, and tomorrow it might happen in Italy, Poland and anywhere else. In my book I made attempts to resist this process.

– Does your book have any statistics? Where did you take them and how they can be checked?

– It is clear there is no statistics. But, as I said, it was given a lot of materials that reflects the flow of information. But there are so many facts. You can find all this and check on the Internet. For example, it’s the actions of snipers on the Maidan. The records clearly show where they shoot from. But these videos were never broadcast on European television. When I presented my book in Rome, there were representatives of the Association “Italy-Ukraine”. Now, they didn’t believe what I said and wrote. Then I showed them this video so they see what really happened. As a result, they too began to think. Many Italians realized that this is overkill.

– Is it possible somewhere to see your materials in the Russian language?

– At the moment this material exists only in Italian. On Russian it is not translated because the copyright belong to the company. But we hope that someone will want to translate into Russian.

– Tell, please, what is your specialty?

– Specialty: pharmacist.

– How circulation in Italy have your book been published and where can it be purchased?

– The circulation is more than three thousand books. You can find it in bookstores and on the Internet. You can download the electronic version too.

– I have a question about the term “genocide of Russians in Donbas”, which you used during the presentation. I would like to clarify in what context you use the term “genocide”?

– We are talking about genocide as a direct attempt to destroy the Russian-speaking population. And I want to say thank you to the fighters of the militia, because they resisted this attempt. Statistics say that more than a million Ukrainians migrated to Russia. Genocide is happening not only here, the same problem is in Ukraine itself. Those who are now opposed to the “Right sector” and the radicals, the nationalists, are at risk.

– How do you consider, whether war, like the one that unleashes the USA in Ukraine, happen in Italy or Spain?

If they’re willing, we can create inside any state what happened in Ukraine, to destroy from the inside any people. They have such opportunities. If they consider it’s necessary, they will act. In Italy one such attempt was made in 1947, when the American government decided that left-wing parties pose a threat to the United States. They thought that Italy will side with Russia.

– Do you see any pressure from the Italian authorities in connection with your activities?

– I’ll know about it when I get back to Italy.

recorded by
Lily NICHIPORCHUK

“Freedom or death”, “beat the whites, until they are red, beat the Reds until they are white”, “Peace to huts, war to palaces” — these and many other slogans firmly entrenched in the historical memory and folklore. First and foremost, this is due to the activities of the revolutionary insurgent army under the leadership of Nestor Ivanovich Makhno.

The figure is undoubtedly odious. Not in vain in Gulyai-pole for the best times of the Republic of Makhno army numbered up to one hundred twenty thousand bayonets. Charisma of Nestor Ivanovich was recognized by enemies and friends. Fighters of the rebel army called him “the father”, the Bolsheviks, the socialist-revolutionary and Petlura had to deal with him since the open struggle against ideologically alien to them national leader of anything good did not promise. Lenin, for example, after talking with him said “Makhno good companion, but until the first intersection”. He was wrong. Agree about the interaction with the “companion” had the Bolsheviks not once. And even Frunze, the soldiers was given the order of execution the army of Makhno is treacherously, in the back, belonged to this idea without much enthusiasm, and was forced to agree only under the pressure of Trotsky.

Charisma of Makhno was appreciated not only by politicians and researchers of the past. The best indicator that a person has remained in history is a popular rumor. In most villages and settlements located in the area where the army fought “the father” will be the old-timers, with the air of a conspirator will tell you that here in the hut, they say, lived (or lives) ex-lover Makhno. The second option is less common — somewhere in the neighborhood of the treasure left by the leader of the anarchists, or someone from his associates. Let in like this, folk-household form, but the people cherish the memory of the rebel army. But chieftains in the Civil war were many. But the heroes of legend have become not all.

And greedy to heroic characters of “independence” propaganda did not avoid “father”. In the nineties it is not known whence appeared “Ukrainian Cossacks” toyed with the idea of that actually Nestor Ivanovich was the bearer of the traditions of Zaporizhzhya Cossacks and almost Ukrainian nationalist. First, though, they did the amendment, that is, that was subconsciously. Not in vain because the nearest large city near Huliaipole — Alexandrovsk (now Zaporozhye). And the traditions of the rebel army were, allegedly, quite Cossack. It was not specified, however, exactly what tradition, because the propaganda machine of the facts is not required. And in two thousand, disregarding any common sense, they began to make from Makhno a Ukrainian version of Che Guevara. On the odious nationalist festival “Independence Day with Makhno”, which for several years was held in Huliaipole, it was possible to meet such language lectures, as “the Ukrainian Anarchy-nationalism against Russian Imperial chauvinism”. In general the festival was an entertaining place. Totally free on the buses were brought back passionate youth from all of former Ukraine. Afternoon there were lectures and patriotic actions which were diluted contests by featuring “topless” girls. In the evening there were musical performances. The only requirement is that the format is no Russian language. Any other could sing anything. And all of this was in the Motherland of Makhno. The fact that the “hero of the occasion” did not consider himself a Ukrainian nationalist, in the tail and mane beat the Austrians and Germans, invited here by “Ukrainian power”, and later spared and Petliurites, the organizers of the event didn’t bother. It was needed the effect of rallying radical youth. And as shown by the second Maidan, it was achieved. Masks on the faces, nationalist chants, or revolution, or the carnival — those who called for “independence Day with Makhno” had seen it much earlier television frames with the Bank and the Grushevsky streets. So to speak, they were watching the rehearsal. For a managed weight football ultras and just thrill-seekers did not have serious evidence: Ukraine — good, Russia — bad, the Bolsheviks and Russians are one and the same, and again Makhno spoke out against the Bolsheviks — so he’s ours. Something is like this. No wonder Makhno “Freedom or death” was removed (with some mutations) in the camp of the Ukrainian nationalists. Accurate statistics will not hold, but it is still interesting — how many of the visitors to the festival went to fight in “Azov” or “Donbass”? And how many of them have already died?

Actually the current war taking place in Novorossia, is entirely a result of substitution of concepts and reprogramming of consciousness. The ideology of aggressive ignorance, the insanity that gripped the residents of the once Malorossia cities is staggering. But we will not oppose one another malignant mythology — let such manipulations are those to whom truth is not available. Our task is to cleanse the images. Although theoretically it is easy to imagine the following construction: objectively Makhno was born on the territory, which was finally liberated from the Turks and Tatars only during the construction of the Novorossia — that means he’s ideologically ours. He acted against big capital, have socialized the land, distributed it to the peasants so, against the oligarchs, then ours. He fought for his country, its means character, then ours. Here’s to you and willing fighter for the cause of Novorossia. But such forgeries are not needed. We can respect our famous countrymen without additional ideological superstructures.

Nestor Ivanovich considered himself an anarchist, a supporter of the idea of a stateless society. In his youth he joined the “Union of free grain growers”, fighting anarchist organization. He participated in armed attacks on the authorities, for which several times was convicted, ultimately sentenced to death, later commuted to life penal servitude, which he served in Butyrskaya prison. It was there that he met his teacher and mentor Peter Arshinova, whose influence finally formed his views. After the February revolution he was granted amnesty by the Interim government as a political prisoner, he personally met with the famous theorist of anarchism Kropotkin. He came back to Huliaipole, headed the revolutionary movement and later the armed struggle. He fought both against whites and against Ukrainians because he did not accept the idea of the state in principle. Several times made alliances with the Reds, but it was always that understanding of the power by Soviet Bolsheviks and the Anarchy-Communists is disagree. He showed himself as an outstanding commander, it was at his hands on the fronts of the civil war there was “tachanka”. Several times he took Ekaterinoslav (modern Dnepropetrovsk), Aleksandrovsk, Berdyansk and Mariupol. However, each time it turned out that in urban environments fighting capacity of the army of Makhno greatly reduced. And administrative management in the cities for him was the difficulty. It should be noted that to organize the life in the familiar and understandable to him of the countryside Nestor Ivanovich was wonderful — in short periods of calm Gulyaypolsky Republic was developing quite normally. It was not only in agricultural, but also in industrial fields. But it is the misunderstanding of the city with its characteristics and caused the defeat of one version of social justice advocated by Makhno and his supporters. Because of “city” is not just a conglomeration of urban structures. The first is a special type of consciousness and worldview. Modern diplomacy with its characteristic cunning and meanness are caused by the city. And this science has been for Makhno unknown and alien.

The clash of ideas in the civil war of the early twentieth century was infinitely tragic. After all, from all sides of the barricades were scoundrels, and idealists, distributed in different proportions. In fact, we are reaping the fruits of schism planted then, still: someone blames all the ills of the “damned Bolsheviks”, and someone rebukes top commanders of Novorossia in the “white guards “. Not timely learned the lessons of that civil war led us to a new, more cunning and sophisticated. And seemingly simple conclusion, lying on the surface that it is not “reds cut whites”, but “Russian cut Russian” remains, unfortunately, beyond the reach of many.

Nestor Makhno ended his life in exile. After his death he was buried on the Parisian cemetery Pere-Lachaise. But the memory of a strong-willed man, who gave himself without reserve to the idea, which he believed to be right, comes back to us again and again. And in spite of ideological differences, he was unquestionably ours, Russian.

Artem OLHIN

What unites the Day of the liberation of Donbas, the Izborsk club and the strategic atomic weapon carrier Tu-95MS? Most readers are unlikely to be able to immediately answer this question, although it is quite simple. The logo that you see on the cover of a magazine, decorated with the aircraft named “Izborsk”, and the menacing machine is in service with the 22nd guards red banner Donbas heavy bomber air division, and received its honorable name, and the title of guards, in the battle for our land.

Stalino, Yenakiyevo, Ilovaysk, Chistyakov, Gorlovka, Debaltsevo, Donetsk, Lisichansk, Konstantinovka, Makiyivka, Slavyansk, Kramatorsk, Mariupol, Volnovaha, Vorochilovgrad – hard to find elsewhere in the world that could be compared with the Donets Basin in the number of military units, on whose banners of They were immortalized the names of the liberated settlements. On September 8, 1943 twenty salvoes from two hundred and twenty-four guns at walls of the Kremlin ushered in the return mining land to our people, and two days later twelve volleys of one hundred and twenty-four guns of the capital honored those who drove the Nazi occupiers from the Azov region.

Today it may seem that in modern conditions to celebrate the anniversary of the liberation of Donbas at least incorrect: two-thirds of the territory of the DPR and LPR are under Bandera occupation is not resolved, many other political and social problems.

This is a misconception: the holidays are given to us not for riotous fun (as some perceive them, and not best, part of our fellow citizens), but as a reminder of the great moments in our history. And those who defended the Donbas in the years 1941-42, and those who liberated it in 1943, should be an example for us, who stood in the way of resurgent Nazism.

In the decisive battle for the freedom of our land participated by those who a few months earlier dropped out to fight in the streets of Stalingrad and to close the ring around the group of troops under the command of von Paulus. Among them there are the famous sniper Vassili Zaitsev, flying ACE Aleksandr Pokryshkin and the future Marshal of Soviet Union Rodion Malinovsky.

The Germans, clinging with a death grip in the banks of the Seversky Donets and Mius, were well aware of who they are dealing with, so decided on a cunning psychological move: in July 1943 the command of the southwestern and southern fronts from captured German soldiers and officers were surprised to learn that against them to keep the defense 6th army of the Wehrmacht, the one which half a year earlier was defeated at the Volga banks. A few days later it became clear that the Nazi leadership to raise the morale of the soldiers a secret “rose” (more precisely — have been created) connection, commanded by von Paulus, but, as we know, German forces, this “all-wise” trick did not help.

Some of the divisions, brigades and regiments that liberated Donbas and glorious way continued after the great Victory, and the city of miners and metallurgists whose names appeared on their banners, for many years maintained contact with them. For the young men of these cities was considered a high honor to be called for military service in, Donbas, part.

The 50th Stalin guards’ rifle division after a decade and a half after the war became known as the 50th Donetsk guards motorized rifle division, and received its dislocation in the Belorussian military district. After the collapse of the USSR part, included in its composition, have played an important role in the construction of the Armed forces of the independent Belarus.

The 40th Yenakiyevo-Danube Guards Rifle Division, which became after the war, the 17th Guards Motorized and 126th Gorlovka Division, became part of the Carpathian Military District. Independent Ukraine, they were not needed, so were disbanded.

The 279th Lisichansk Red Banner Infantry Division after the war became the 44th training tank and transferred to the Urals. A few years ago, it set up a training base Armored Center, one of the best in Russia.

The 59th Kramatorsk guards infantry division, which became after the war, the 8th separate Kramatorsk red banner orders of Suvorov and Bogdan Khmelnitskiy guards motorized rifle brigade and stationed in the Odessa military district, almost fifty years later she again had to participate in hostilities. On its basis was established the Russian Peacekeeping contingent in Transnistria, and still carrying a service in that troubled region of the world.

In our days a living memory of the heroism of our liberators is the 22nd guards of red banner Donbas the divisions are the pride of the strategic aviation of Russia. It is on its armaments consist of minds of the global public supersonic carriers of nuclear weapons Tu-160, and much of the far turboprop bombers Tu-95MS — proven and very reliable technology.

It was formed on March 5, 1942 at an air base in Ryazan Dyagilevo like the 62nd Air Division for further action. She participated in the Battle of Stalingrad and the Caucasus, and in the heady days of the heady days of the summer of 1943 was based in the city of Rostov region.

On the 8th of November of the same year, in Gorlovka, where was transferred the headquarters of the division was handed guards banner, but in addition, it has received the current room: the order on it was released one and a half months earlier on September, 18. After another six months the divisions will be called the Donbas: its pilots fought for the Baltic States. Then there were the liberation of the Western Ukraine, Poland and Berlin operation.

Victory Day Donbas Heavy Bomber met in the Polish town of Ciechanow. After the war, its principal place of dislocation permanently became the Belarusian Bobruisk, and after the collapse of the USSR – Engels, Saratov region.

On a frosty day in February 2008, the author of these lines in the delegation of journalists happened to be visiting those who continue to carry the banner of the Liberators of Donbas. Engels airbase – itself a unique monument of history: the main relic of staff is considered to be in the room telephone for government communications, by means of which landed near the places Yuri Gagarin, Khrushchev reported on successful return from space. The foyer is decorated with a portrait of house officers Raskovoy where renowned pilot shaped female air regiments, here in the rare leisure time she played the piano beautifully sky “lured” prosperous Conservatory student, who predicted a great career as a musician.

At the base there are two museums, which are open on certain days of free access to tour groups. In one of them collected a fine collection of combat and training aircraft, into which you can even climb on a shaky ladder, but its most valuable exhibit is a nondescript, “corncob” An-2, on board which made training jumps studied in Saratov first cosmonaut. The second is unique because it is dedicated to the rear of the long-range aviation. Within its walls you understand the whole meaning of the famous words of Alexander Tvardovsky “Russian worker-soldier”: the prose of earthly labor – the foundation, without which it is impossible romance of high flight.

The meetings are the best part of these trips, with fellow countrymen, and, as live and virtual. To acquaint the guests with the history of Russian long-range aviation Engelstsy start with the personality of the founder of this kind of troops – Major General Michael Shydlovsky, a representative of a noble Slobozhanskiy noble family, who played a major role in the development of Donbas and leave a memory of our region. He was able to appreciate the talent of the young aircraft designer Igor Sikorsky and achieve mass production of unique for its time, heavy bombers, “Ilya Muromets”, the development of which was initially rejected by officials. In 1914 he was entrusted with the formation of the world’s first air squadron of strategic purpose. The fate of this man was tragic: Michael Shydlouski died during the Civil War, and his name has only recently been returned to the Fatherland.

In the museum stand there is the album with the inscription “From the miners Gorlovka”. In Soviet times, between Air Division and the residents of Donbas is actively communicating, arranged mutual visits to each other. But after the collapse of the USSR, it was almost completely lost.

Then Donbas Heavy Bomber Guard commanded by Major General Alexander Blazhenko. That’s what he told me:

– I was born in the village of South Lomovatka in Luhansk, in miner’s family. I wish that our relationship was closer to the people of Donbas proud that there is a division, and we – that freed the edge of your …

One of the traditions in the division was the revival of the custom of giving the names of their own aircrafts. Tu-160 is named after the famous aviator, and, not necessarily of the dead (the famous aces Alexander Molodchy, Pavel Taran and Vasily Reshetnikov awarded this right during his lifetime), Tu-95MS – in honor of the city, in one way or another connected with the history of the connection: if I expressed the wish that the sky furrowed board with the names of “Mine” and “Gorlovka”: places where air division won and got his Guards flag. I hope that readers will support me in this: heroic Donbas deserves to once in a festive day of its cities in the parade passed airplanes current heirs of glory light in September 1943.

Night takeoff of Tu-160 ships with a full load on combat watch. Huge the flames escaping from the rumbling engines set in the afterburner mode. Underfoot trembling concrete, at some point begin to ache terribly eardrums ears: this moment seems like an eternity. However, the plane breaks away from the strip and dissolves in the black sky, turning into one of the twinkling stars in the winter sky.

And at this moment you feel genuine pride for those who now bear the banner of your freedom. The banner of our freedom.

Alexander DMITRIEVSKY

“Russian rock” became one of the most notable gravediggers of the USSR. It was, of course, a huge number of other factors that influenced the collapse of the red Empire. But “non-systemic opposition”, and hung Fennec imbued a previously unknown meanings, and clearly just prepared the youth of the Soviet Union to the idea that the Empire will fall – and nothing to worry about. But “non-systemic opposition”, which imbued a previously unknown meanings; and it clearly just prepared the youth of the Soviet Union to the idea that the Empire will fall – and nothing to worry about. They say it will only get better. So, no sooner said than done. And yes the results are there.

A crime without repentance

Mass culture as a way of shaping perception of the world by every single person is still undervalued in the theoretical developments of Russian scientists. It is Russian, because our Western opponents on the basis of different subcultures have long has developed a clever algorithm. Suffice it to recall the factory of football hooliganism – all countries with “orange” conflicts of “ultras” were equally as trouble-free operation. From Milosevic and to Yanukovych, even where football is not the main demand of the spectacle is everywhere at the right moment appeared ready for anything “ultras” who had consistently opposed the current government.

But before that there were other subcultures, they were different in form, but with the exact same, “anti-systemic” content. Outwardly very different, they could even be hostile to each other. But it didn’t change anything when it needs to be all together, in unison to maintain the power that our Homeland has acted on the principle of “Falling – push, push!” It was often done unknowingly. But the destructive effect was not smaller. And the most interesting – Soviet state have nursed their gravediggers, that is, “with hands”. We can say that the ideological system of the USSR made quite a conscious suicide.

It is clear that the deep ideological crisis of the Soviet society since “the dethronement of Stalin’s personality cult” developed long ago and in many directions simultaneously. The uncertainty that the system existing in the Soviet Union is proper and produced at all levels of mass culture, ranging from books and movies. Not in vain because the first dissidents had no relation to music. But it is the music of the counterculture wave, shaped in the form of “Russian rock” became one of the most effective tools in the decay of morals and the spirit. And where there are no goals, where younger generations do not see sense to protect the heritage of their fathers – there begins the entropy.

Very good this aspect was shown in the movie Karen Shakhnazarov’s “the Vanished Empire”, and after was called “Love in USSR”. Main characters of the film are the Soviet “Golden” youth, living in Moscow, being externally in the paradigm of Communist ideology, absolutely not interested in anything that could be useful for the country in which they live. Moreover, the entire Soviet gives them a soft rejection, but the real interests are albums by Deep Purple and Rolling Stones records “on bones”, partying and playing music in my own band. The real situation in the USSR of the Brezhnev period of “stagnation” was just that. It is not surprising that later, at the end of “perestroika” this generation without hesitation stepped into a different reality. And the consequences of this step, unfortunately, is still realized not all.

In the period of “perestroika” in many cities of the Union were established rock clubs, which included almost all groups, which eventually became a cult. The absurdity of the situation that unfolded in the framework of the activities of the Leningrad rock club, Sverdlovsk and fellow of the Moscow rock laboratory is truly worthy of the pages of anthologies. Judge for you: rock music is intensive business. Anyone who has ever tried to “cobble together”

the group knows how much money you need – purchase of tools, instruments, gadgets, and the cost of the recording process – all of this comes at a price. It is, in principle, and rightly so — if you want to abuse the power, be good, to do it “their own”. But in the USSR all was differently! “Kino” and “Nautilus”, “Aquarium”, “Alice” and many others, as full-time employees of the rock clubs not only received a salary from the state, they are still albums recorded at public expense, and after riding in the tour encompasses all the “hateful scoop.” And in every town they sang about that with this system, something wrong, and it was going to die soon. Entire stadiums were going to these shows. Not a paradox it? Imagine that you educate and keep the man who systematically produces incriminating materials. You know, you read the monthly updates on his activities and approvingly nod: “Well, keep it up”. It is clear that it is a systemic betrayal of the elites, the nomenclatures of the USSR, because the project “rock clubs” could not be achieved without the involvement of the state. It is also clear that many “borderless reformers” actually just didn’t know what they were doing. And problems in the Soviet system really there were enough; it was possible to criticize wittily and convincingly. But “system” could respond only to the already dead language of Marxism-Leninism. Well, at best, boring to wave the slogan “Glory to the CPSU”. In short: the fight was clearly unequal.

But after the collapse of the USSR in the period of the disgrace and poverty of Yeltsin’s Russia, has confessed to the crime, not all. Yes and the Russian state itself did not take lessons from history for the future: and now the ex-President Medvedev pompously, with TV, he meets his “favorite musicians,” Grebenshikov, Makarevich and others like them. Those, incidentally, who now first made against the return of the Crimea to Russia, and then began to sing songs of “heroes ATO” and personally to meet with junta leaders. This time consciously, because previous examples of the consequences of the dismemberment of the Soviet Union and the shelling of the Parliament in 1993 – should be enough to excess. Apparently, it’s not enough.

Siberian sourdough

All rockers, who later became legendary, in one degree or another “suffered from the system.” That they later, the same “system” is quite successfully used, it is accepted to speak as less. Most often it is a minor administrative hassles – Shevchuk, for example, was forced from Ufa to move to Leningrad; one of the musicians of “Chaif” Vladimir Begunova, was dismissed from a policeman. But all of this only adds to the heroic biography “fighters with a mode”, raises their status. And really severe persecutions were, perhaps, only part of the Siberian group “Civil defense”: after the release of the first album took them over the comrades from the SSC. As a result vocalist and undisputed leader, Yegor Letov, was sent on compulsory treatment in a psychiatric hospital. Ally Letov’s, Kuzma Ryabinov, despite contraindications, recognized as “fit” for military service and sent to Baikonur. And here we encounter another paradox generated by the interaction of the Soviet system and the counter-culture.

Thanks to the information campaign deployed by Sergey Letov, the older brother Yegor, he was released from the hospital. Then with redoubled energy he began to record the albums “overlay” by himself. That’s because of Siberian SSC took good care that none of his colleagues did not come close to the disgraced musician. Albums released “Civil Defense” in the period from 1985 to 1989 became the real example of anti-Soviet agitation. Frank, fierce, full of powerful sound, with frank and often unprintable lyrics they enjoyed incredible demand. The army of fans “CD” has grown by leaps and bounds. And suddenly – the USSR ceased to exist.

As Letov claimed that the texts written in the Soviet period were a reflection of horror from rigidity and slowness of the state machine. But, as time has shown, they in any case have not been imbued with the poison of hatred towards their own people and to their country, on the contrary. In the early 90’s at acoustic concerts Egor Letov began to sing patriotic and the songs of “demobilization”. In the albums it appears frank nostalgia for Soviet period. And it can hardly be attributed to the principle of “I will always be against”. Apparently, seeing the grin of the new system, Letov found the courage to do what but him was capable of a few – admit the error; it is best described in the phrase “were aiming at the USSR, and was shot in Russia.” Thus, “Civil defense” became the principal conductor of reactionary thinking. Because only Letov had the courage to dedicate a song to the defenders of the Government House in 1993, to join anti-Yeltsin’s and frankly quite adequate then the National Bolshevik Party, to write, in the end, the lines “See, rise from the knees, my homeland, I can hear my Soviet Motherland sing…”.

Musicians always have his fans behind them. Often they follow the idol without looking, and not really thinking, such is the essence of subcultures. But Letov those who followed him, brought up in a Patriotic camp. And for that, I think the Lord will forgive him a lot, perfect in rock’n’roll’s oblivion. Very Russian all this: sincerely hate it, sincerely repent, try to fix. Towards the end of his musical career Letov stopped making political statements. But albums which are really patriotic, reminiscent of the greatness of Motherland in spite of everything, it’s amazing have left many. One “Starfall” is worth.

Igor Fyodorovich Letov was born in September 1964, and died in 2008. But for some reason it does not work I have to submit it in the column “bellantonio” with Shevchuk and Makarevich. But singing on the barricades for the fighters of Novorossiya – it’s simple. I am sure that he would be with us now. After all, as he sang in his last album, “In a flame there isn’t a ford…”

The trap snapped

Rock movement has long lost its destructive power, giving way to a more energetic and popular subcultures. The remnants of rock-n-roll front behaved differently in the face of new challenges. Often, moving in inertial flows, the former rock gurus continue to find fault with their country, as before. They look petty and ridiculous. Pleasant exceptions to this rule are very few. Mostly people who have already visited with concerts in Donetsk and Luhansk: Vadym Samoylov from “Agatha Christie”, Julia Chicherina and even a few honest individuals.

However, the most consistent position in relation to the situation took another sincerely repentant musician Konstantin Kinchev. In one of his last interviews he said: “What to do? To support ours and to stand for them! Any governmental agency consists mainly of rogues, crooks and thieves, so choose not particularly… from whom. All the powers are the same. But! These are OUR crooks and thieves; they must be maintained in an acute situation of the country… When the whole world with maniacal persistence accuses Russia of all sins, when the whole world demands punishment for Russia, Willy-nilly, have to unite with the Power. With OUR one, not with someone else…” Here, perhaps, nothing to add.

Artem OLHIN

In France the tragedy occurred. This, of course, horrible, people died. And the whole Western world went into ecstasy now. Leading politicians of the world with indignation extremism brand promise to fight terrorists and defend European “universal” values. But rather dubious “universal” values are values only for Europeans. For some reason the Europeans appropriated the right to decide what has value and what doesn’t. And here’s Nicolas Sarkozy with joy on his face, barely restraining not to smile with joy (there was a chance for PR), denounces “savages” who had violated the “civilization”. No more and no less.

But here something prevents me to empathize with the French in full. When I show footage from Paris, before my eyes get up, for some reason, footage from the House of trade unions in Odessa. Or photo of a boy from Shakhtersk, which after shell fired of the Ukrainian army, lost both legs, one arm, knocked out the eye, disfigured face and his five-year-old brother was killed. I recall the children of Beslan and the fury of the West over the destruction of bandits who seized the school. Turns out, forces were used disproportionately for them. Islamic thugs (don’t want to call them Chechens, they have no right to call this proud name) live quietly in England.

The West does not notice their crimes: the slave trade, the murder of children, women, committing terrorist acts. They allowed the terrorist Poroshenko to participate in the March against the terrorists. It’s impossible to think slapstick more.

But all this ballyhoo about shooting editorial minor magazine looks like a very statement. Of course, the death penalty, these journalists do not deserve. But to get in the face is “Yes”. A decent man, if he really is cultural, not affords to offend the Holy feelings of the other person. After such things his face can be beaten. But they did, and so completely innocent victims cannot be. Most interesting is that nobody paid attention to the words of the Duke of Anjou, who refused to participate in this Comedy. He knows that after such things decent people caused the equal to a duel, and slaves just were smacked.

But that’s not it. Most likely, they are pawns in the game, and they were sacrificed. This is an old proven way in the West — not to rely on the case, and to organize it. Case is case: the case may be or may not be. And the idea is already there, and its implementation need event — here it is.

And generally they all ears buzz us about some “universal values” that are only in the West and they, like Prometei or Danko, carry them to savages. We are among savages too. But we remember what these “values” brought blacks in Africa, the Indians in America and more recently us. Once the USSR was no more, the deep Amazon flowed to us real “value”: glass beads, rotten pilchards, saccharin, “fire water”, pornography and drugs.

But there is good advertising there. Junk wrapped in a shiny wrapper, and, oddly enough, it works perfectly. For example: our banderlogs. They are shown that actually mean these “values”, but they don’t see. They have a shiny wrapper before their eyes. In the Amazon, by the way, so they catch monkeys. Take something brilliant and show it to the monkey; she falls into a state of stupor and they take her bare hands. So these values are only in words. The cases always and everywhere are opposed. The British, for example, yelling about democracy, in fact, being a monarchy, but this is not to say, because the monarchy implies something incompatible with democracy. They shout about love, but hatred already bursting with them (look at Ukraine). They promote freedom, and under this sauce served us the depravity and filth. There are only talks about abundance and prosperity, and in fact phony — beautiful harmful products. Well, cruelty, lust, hypocrisy, duplicity are always different in Europe and then the USA. But they always blamed us on it. But we know that “hold the thief!” thief yells the loudest. Proof we can assume what happened after the Paris shows.

In unison with the Paris tragedy was a tragedy in Volnovakha, every day the number of victims of the shelling of Donetsk increases, there was a provocative shelling of residential areas in Mariupol, Gorlovka almost is bombed in the ground. But if Volnovakha and Mariupol in the West caused an instant and inadequate response, then about Donetsk and Gorlovka nobody said anything. We can conclude that if Volnovakha and Mariupol were planned and all were just waiting for go-ahead, Donetsk, Gorlovka in the plans is not included and they were not ready to respond. And here we see the hypocrisy and crocodile tears for the innocent victims. What of the innocent victims, no doubt. And here the lamentations are blatantly false. After all, in Donetsk killed at least innocent people, but regrets about their death somehow not.

The next day, without waiting for any Commission, the U.S. state Department and the European Union have expressed anguish over the “cases” in Volnovakha and Mariupol. That is never anyone in Ukraine had not expressed — and suddenly. For them there was no Odessa, Mariupol, Slavyansk, Lugansk, but not now and Donetsk. An enumeration of all the crimes of the Kiev junta, the brainchild of the West, will take up too much space and time.

In Mariupol locals saw immediately after the shelling, the military came and started to fix the funnel, to the Commission, the OSCE has drawn the right conclusions. Again innocent people have died. They again just sacrificed for their purposes. They were killed with cold blood. And now killers do PR on their blood, and that’s really scary.

The conclusion is simple. We need to stay away from these bad people. Let them eat their “values” themselves. There are others civilization in the world, besides European, the most savage and inhuman. Because of we always belonged to Slavic civilization. So why do we need to replace it with a pacifier?

Victor NEER

Remember to start the timeline. Early September morning in 2001 at 7: 59 PM Eastern time, the plane “the Boeing-767” airline “American Airlines” flew out of Boston and headed for the city of Los Angeles. Flying over the state of New York it abruptly changed its course and headed in the direction of the state capital of New York City. At 8:45 it crashed into the North tower of the World Trade Center (WTC) on the 84th floor of the 110 story building. After a powerful explosion in the building the fire started.

At 8:14 from the airport “Logan” in the city of Boston the liner “the Boeing-767” airlines “United Airlines” took the start and went to the same Los Angeles. However flying over the state of New Jersey the plane turned around and headed for Manhattan. Here the airliner dived and crashed into the South tower of the World Trade Center at the 50th floor.

Then at about 9 am from Washington airport “Dallas”, “Boeing-767-200” flew to the city of Los Angeles. After some time the aboard disappeared from radar screens, and when the connection with it was restored it was flying toward the White House at maximum speed. As a result the trajectory of its flight led to the building of the Pentagon in which it crashed at 9:40. In the wall of the building it was formed a “hole” with a height of six floors and a width of about 50 meters.

Finally, the fourth and the last of the “Boeing” airlines “United Airlines” flew at 8:00 from the city of Newark in the direction of San Francisco. In the air it also made a turn towards the capital, but failed to reach it crashing to the ground near the village of Shanksville.

Parallel to all these events WTC, as the main arena for the unfolding tragedy, was in ruins: its South tower lay in ruins, and at 10: 28 minutes and the North tower collapsed. Among the causes of the collapse was identified not only large-scale destruction of supporting structures, but the high temperatures caused by large fires.

Official statistics have established that as a result of explosions and destruction, the total number of deaths were 3 170 people, including in the city of New York – 2 937 people.

The actions of the Bush administration were as follows: the incident qualified as an open aggression of terrorists “al-Qaeda” against the country, and therefore, America will resort to the appropriate response. Personal responsibility for the incident was placed on the head of terrorist network “al-Qaeda” – Osama bin Laden, while the control center of terrorist activity, according to the U.S. administration, was in Afghanistan.

Against this background the UN Security Council was urgently assembled and passed Resolution 1368, in which it was spoken about the right of States to self-defence in case of aggression, and called for participation in the antiterrorist operation and justice on the guilty. Following this logic the majority of States of the world expressed sympathy and support to the people of the United States.

The next step in this process was the ultimatum to “al- Qaeda” by the administration of America, which contained a number of requirements, among which the main ones were the requirements for the issuance of the organization’s leaders and a complete curtailment of terrorist activities. In particular, an ultimatum was addressed to the Saudi millionaire Osama bin Laden, the man whose work during the confrontation with the Soviet Union and the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan was controlled by American intelligence agencies. And according to some versions it was generally associated with the business of the family Bush.

But as you know, after 1996 Osama arrived at the invitation of the Taliban leader Mullah Omar to Afghanistan, and then he launched an active work on preparation of insurgents with the aim of inflicting damage on the US and the West in general. That’s why Osama bin Laden began to be perceived as the heir of Saladin, the great ruler of the warrior, who defeated the English king Richard the Lion-heart and the Western crusaders.

So in his account there were written Sudanese trail, the bombings of American embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in August 1998 and the attack on the ship of the U.S. Navy “Cole” in Yemen in October 2000. Moreover in 2004 the broadcaster “Al-Jazeera” showed a video in which he took responsibility for the events of 11 September 2001.

So it seems natural the fact that the terrorists immediately rejected the ultimatum, although it was proposed to judge Osama by Syariah Court in Afghanistan. But this option does not suit for the U.S.

In fairness we must say that at first the majority of countries including Russia, Iran, Pakistan and China jointly made with America in the international coalition in its desire to carry out anti-terrorist operation in Asia against the Afghan Taliban. On October, 7 in 2001 American and British air force conducted the first air strikes against the Taliban in Afghanistan, and then full-scale operation of retribution began…

But let’s back to the original event and reactions to it in the United States and the world. As for the findings on the origins of these terrorist attacks, at “the report of the Commission investigating the attacks of September 11, 2001” (chaired by T. Keane) you can find a lot of interesting observations and generalizations, but not declared “independent, impartial and objective” work. Thus, the Commission did not added to the case records of internal monitoring of the WTC buildings and the Pentagon, and took into account these cameras which were placed (by skilled operators) on the perimeter of the tragedy unfolding; or about the statement of the journalist P. de Marco about the many explosions that took place on the upper floors of skyscrapers, but “coming down” to 38 floors; or indications of firefighter T.Turilli and R. Bacsinszky about “fucking noise”, i.e. about the same multiple explosions in the twin towers.

However, the performers of the criminal intent were installed – Mohammed Atta and K º and found a Grand international terroristic worldwide network.

However for an adequate understanding of what happened on September, 11 in 2001 and the totality of ongoing processes in the world, it is advisable to pay attention to those causes that were not included in the official version of the investigation of the tragedy. Especially because they were discovered and named the different beliefs people: Americans – K. Bolin, G. Vidal, D. R. Griffin, K. Prestowitz, T. Maysan, N. Chomsky; Italians – J. Chiesa, F. Cardini, M. Montesano and C. Modugno, Austria – G. Risseghem; the Russians – A. Panarin, A. Zinoviev, A. Kazintsev, L. Mlechin, Y. Mukhin, and many others. Actually they rise to a situation of “cognitive dissonance”, which has not been overcome by many researchers of the question, but also unknown in most mass which are exposed to the manipulative technologies of consciousness.

All the reasons that contradict the version of terrorist attacks by fanatical Muslims, despite their hidden (implicit) nature, can be divided into several blocks.

The first one is engineering and construction. According to the chief architect of the twin towers Christopher Bolin, shock from one dive Boeing is not able to cause serious damages to the
building: the axis of which is concrete pole in diameter of 9 meters and with additional supports (distributed around the perimeter of the building) – there were 47 them (!).In addition the Commission somehow ignored the fact of the collapse of building No. 7 of the WTC, in which the aircraft is simply not rammed. It also established that this 47-storey building also collapsed vertically at a speed close to the speed of free fall.

In short, the very texture of complex engineering facilities requires a different explanation. And such was found in the form of the concept of a directional explosion involving the laying explosives on the floors of skyscrapers with a certain step, plus their vertical caving (top – down). To the above we should add that the experts have put great doubt on the fact that the damage left by Boeing in the Pentagon in Washington, could be the result of it, the airliner hit.

The second one is financial and economic. The general public is unknown that since March in 2000 the American economy entered a cycle of crisis reflected in the fall in the shares of most companies (by March 2001 they fell by 5.3 trillion. $ or in excess of half the country’s GDP (!). By August in 2001 this trend has become a disaster: it was soon followed the closure of the New York stock exchange, as the NYSE index (cumulative index of all shares represented at the stock exchange) fell by 30%. It is of interest that according to G. Riegger, namely the infusion of the Federal Reserve Bank in the U.S. economy a considerable amount of money after the attacks on the world trade center: September, 13 – 70 billion dollars; September, 14 – RB 81.25 billion; further through the so-called “discount window” 45.6 billion dollars to the banking system; contracts with the European Central Bank on the transaction at $ 50 billion, with an English Bank at $ 30 billion, with the Japanese Central Bank 16.8 billion, with the Canadian 10 billion.

In other words: if it was by magic “the financial crisis gradually began to dissolve” (V. Katasonov) and America again felt confident.

The third one is political and military. It is interesting that on the morning of September, 12 the Minister of defense D. Rumsfeld demanded to attack Iraq as a “priority objective” while not having the slightest evidence who were the hijackers. He was said against by the Secretary of state Colin Powell, who argued it of needing to prepare public opinion for the anti-terrorist campaign, because the CIA had organized and financed the Taliban at the time.

However since September, 11 the US had been setting up military bases where there are significant sources of energy. Mainly, of course, it is in Central Asia. Thesis is formulated on the States comprising the “axis of evil” (in other terminology – “outlaw States”): Iraq, Iran, North Korea, Cuba and potentially Belarus.

In parallel with it G. Bush has been pushing Congress total control over citizens and non-citizens, will void the Kyoto Protocol, are making moves to exit from the Agreement on the International war crimes court and the Treaty of Intercontinental missiles.

In general these steps can be interpreted in different ways, for example as a continuation of the U.S. “perpetual war for perpetual peace”, which began after Pearl – Harbor and the ensuing worldwide for over fifty years (G. Vidal). But the war in Afghanistan still has some hidden causality promulgated by the Americans not so long ago.

It is about the fact that on May 6, 2011 one of the most senior analysts from the USA, the former head of the planning division of the U.S. Department of state under three presidents Clinton, Bush and Obama, S. R. Pechenik, during the popular TV show Alex Jones said: the attacks of September 11, 2001 were staged by the American secret services. Moreover his speech sounded the names of those who planned and implemented these shares. These were: Vice-President D. Cheney, Deputy Minister of defense P. Wolfowitz, Advisor to the President for national security Condoleezza Rice and her deputies – E. Abrams and S. Hadley.

Along with this recognition Pechenik announced his readiness to testify to its truth before a Grand Jury (the Grand jury). In this case it is reasonable to wonder about why this group of persons classified as “global Manager” (V. I. Karpenko, A. B. Rudakov) allow this terrible criminal act for themselves?

It seems that the most adequate answer we find in the last lifetime work of Alexander Panarin – “Strategic instability in the twenty-first century”. Here Russian philosopher and political scientist gave the key to the turning point of history: “After the blitzkrieg in Yugoslavia, the main problem of the new “global hegemon” was the condition own country, staying in an invalid pre-war relaxation. Then the events of September, 11 came which gave the occasion to announce the mobilization of the American nation to combat global terrorism. And no one was surprised: why to fight with some Bin Laden not require additional mobilization of the secret service (and one of their divisions), and total mobilization of the entire military machine of the USA and NATO; increased military spending to twice their height during the cold war of the West against the Soviet Union; the reorganization of the strategic defense system and finally a tough dilemma, extended to all countries of the world: who is not with us in this war – against us. Message from the President of the United States “About the state of the nation” is a real message to the nation in the period of deadly danger and deadly hostility:

“We live in a unique time, our country is at war, our country is in recession, and world peace is facing an unprecedented threat… the War has just begun, and Afghanistan is only the first field of the battle”.

So, this key is quite linked: “the Mystery of September 11, 2001, or how the hidden springs of American politics do” with adopted by Congress “the Doctrine of national security of the United States” (2002), where the whole world is interpreted as the zone of its strategic interests. As it is linked with all subsequent world events – the aggression against Iraq, “color revolutions” in Eurasia and Africa, the fight against the Islamic state (ISIS), the war in the Donbas…

In a series of these events and processes is viewed a kind of apocalyptic logic of the struggle “liberal good” with “evil anti-liberal”, the creators and followers of the highest capitalist formations with its opponents – Chinese (hybrid) communism, the Islamic alternative, post-Soviet Russia, suddenly remembering about its Messianic calling. In other words, “Liberal Jihad is the key concept to refer to the American “anti-terrorist operation”, the real name of which is the global war on infidels”.

As far as this proposition is true, we can make sure by our own tragic experience, i.e. the experience of the war of American and Bandera jihadists against “terrorists” of the DPR and the LPR, which “defiling” themselves disagreement with the apparent coup and desire to live in Russian.

And in this sense the poet is as always right (in this case – Vladimir Skobcsov):

An intruder in the home:
Already coming a different order,
Where the human flesh tastes sweet,
Just be grateful you’re alive.

And how can you not think about the four horsemen of the Apocalypse: war, civil war, famine and death leaping from the USA after the 11th of September 2001 all over the world!

However that all the peoples of the Russian World and other worlds, who are or may become the target of American liberal jihadists, need to remember one simple truth: in God’s sight and in the sight of man, lie there can be no justification, but “eternal truth triumph” (M. Lermontov) is welcomed both in heaven and among the peoples who have chosen this measure of Life.

Dmitry MUZA

On August 23, 1939 it was signed a non-aggression Treaty between the USSR and Germany which is better known as the “Molotov — Ribbentrop Pact”. This diplomatic victory of the Soviet Union allowed winning in time and territory and it is still hated by our enemies: not in vain in 2009, the European Parliament declared the date of signing of the so-called “day of remembrance for victims of Stalinism and Nazism”.

The day after the signing of the infamous Munich agreement Winston Churchill uttered his famous words: “England has been offered a choice between war and dishonor. It has chosen a shame and will get a war.” All European countries in the second half of the 1930-ies chose dishonor for the sake of their potential opponent sooner or later got in a war not with them, and with a single country — the USSR. High side forgetting about basic dignity played a “giveaway” stronger, paying destinies weaker: they tried to delay their participation in the sharing of the global pie to the moment when it will be able to eliminate from the path of the resurgent Russian superpower.

In the era of Interbellum there were no allies of the USSR in Europe it was able to establish relatively good relations with Turkey, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Greece and the Scandinavian Kingdom, but all the other countries view us as enemies or as a political entity, which will want at some point to expand sphere of influence into their territory. Definitely Pro-German position was occupied by Bulgaria, Romania, Hungary and Finland; all three Baltic dictators were sympathetic to Nazism: Antanas Smetona, Konstantin Payts and Karlis Ulmanis. Opponent of rapprochement with Germany was only Pilsudski, however, after the death of the Warsaw “Comandante” he was replaced by a triumvirate in the person of Marshal Edward Rydz-Smigley, President Ignacy Macsitskiy (often incorrectly referred to as Moscicki) and Minister of foreign Affairs Josef Beck: this trio especially the foreign Minister, openly sympathized with Berlin.

Help to the friendly regime of the Spanish Republic’s has not brought success: leading players in European politics could not afford the Iberian Peninsula under their control, and the USSR was not available common borders with Spain, and marine communications passed through hostile waters. In Asia the situation was slightly better: the troubled border with China on its significant stretch was covered by satellites in the face of Mongolia and Tuva, but Iran and Afghanistan since the beginning of the 1930-ies flirted with England and Germany that did not create peace in the spaces between the Caspian Sea and the Pamir mountains.

The year 1938 brought our country new alarm: in March, there was the Anschluss of Austria, dramatically increased the potential of Nazi Germany. For example the population of the Third Reich in that year amounted to nearly half the population of the USSR, the ranks of the Wehrmacht were supplemented by six Austrian divisions, and the German defense industry — new plants. Summer abruptly worsened the situation in the Far East, where the samurai warlords and their Manchurian accomplices started the conflict at Lake Khasan. The direction of the Middle East cracked: in April it happened the rupture of relations with Saudi Arabia, they have found a new ally in the person of London, and in November instead of the deceased friendly Mustafa Ataturk, the head of Turkey became the General Ismet Inoynuy, who deployed his gaze towards Berlin and Paris. Autumn of 1938 was marked by two shameful events which crossed out last remnants of respect for the principles of state sovereignty and territorial integrity.

On September, 29-30 in Munich behind closed doors Hitler, Mussolini, Chamberlain and Daladier decided on the transfer of Czechoslovakia to Nazi Germany the Sudetenland in exchange for peace agreements of the Axis countries with England and France. Czechoslovak diplomats despite all their protests allowed in the courtroom only to familiarize with the already signed document. A few hours later Warsaw with the tacit consent of Berlin stabs in the back to its southern neighbor: it was an ultimatum with claims of Tieszyn region; and Prague Castle is forced to reconcile with the requirements under the impunity of Josef Beck.

Interestingly that the USSR originally had intended to send representatives to Munich to protect the interests of Czechoslovakia with whom it had a Treaty of friendship however it was refused by the other participants of the behind-the-scenes intrigue. In addition the Red Army was preparing to provide relying on the Treaty military assistance, however, broken Prague decided not to send a request and Warsaw has not given approval for the transit of military cargo through its territory.

On November, 2 Germany and Italy during the First Vienna arbitration verdict that the land of Southern Slovakia and Transcarpathia should belong to Hungary. Thus Berlin and Rome took over the function of last resort with authority to redraw the map of the world at their discretion.

The Munich agreement has finished Czechoslovakia for three and a half months. The country erupted into ethnic conflicts and in mid-March the state decays: in Slovakia it was created the puppet Republic, and the Czech Republic aligns it with the Third Reich in the form of so-called “protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia”. Moreover it crushed the last resistance of Germany from other European countries: when in March 1939 Berlin demanded Klaipeda region from Lithuania they got it on demand.

In January 1939 Poland are given to understand the justice of the old truth: “If you give way, you can’t stop!” Hitler is causing Beck to his residence, where offers to join to future aggression against the USSR promising Warsaw Ukrainian lands, but also requires permits for the building of an extraterritorial highway to East Prussia through Poland. Beck understands that all of this is prohibitive fee for Tieszyn region, and in response, said that Warsaw must have English and French guarantees: what if London and Paris had already agreed with Moscow?

The fears of the Polish Minister were not in vain: in the spring of 1939, the Soviet Union started to probe the soil for the establishment of a new Entente with the main allies of Imperial Russia. However neither Britain nor France did not show proper enthusiasm: their delegations, consisting of third-rate figures, are not endowed with any authority, traveled to Moscow via Leningrad at the slowest ships and trains, and arrived in the Soviet capital only on August, 11. Three weeks earlier in London secret Anglo-German negotiations have started; the main bargaining chip in them is Poland and the Baltic States, and in addition Berlin has requested access to resource-rich former colony of Namibia and Tanganyika. Of course in conversations of diplomats prevails Polish question: persistently did not want to become a German vassal of the shrew Warsaw needs taming, and so the British or convince Beck and n Macsitskiy not to resist Berlin’s requirements, or will not prevent the annexation of Poland, and if the USSR will try to stand up — join the anti-Comintern Pact. The fate of the Baltic States is makeweight: these Border States become the springboard for the deployment of the main forces by striking at the very heart of the Soviet Union.

The USSR was in a catastrophic situation. Narrow border strip width from twenty to forty miles separated from a potential enemy such strategic centers such as Minsk, Batumi, Leningrad and Odessa: if necessary, the city could be exposed to heavy artillery, and the last three in this list fall in the zone of reach of naval guns of the main caliber. From Khabarovsk to the border in those years there were sixty kilometers, from Murmansk- ninety, one hundred and fifty — from Vladivostok and two from Kiev: this is a zone of actions of front aviation. Three hundred miles it was necessary to overcome the enemy for the achievement of Sevastopol and four hundred fifty — to Moscow, Zaporozhye and Dnepropetrovsk: it is quite on the shoulder for distant bomber.

With this arrangement, in the case of a ground strike battles for Leningrad, Minsk, Murmansk and Odessa were supposed to start already in the first days, if not hours, of enemy invasion. In the subsequent week the war Kiev was under attack and a month after the start of the campaign it was to be expected battles on the outskirts of Moscow.

It is clear that such a prospect did not please the Soviet leadership. The country was preparing for the implementation of the strategy of a blind defense: along the Western frontiers there were constructed chain of fortified areas and between them and the border — “track maintenance” with guerrilla bases for a ruthless war in the enemy’s rear. They had to constrain the bandwidth of logistics: on the borders with Poland and Romania there were no rearrangement to the European gauge wagons, and some railway lines leading into the Baltic States and Finland were put on deep conservation. Accordingly, the industrialization of the border regions to think was impossible.

And this is the layout of war only for the Western theater of military operations (TMO): it was impossible to exclude the occurrence of a similar theatre in the Caucasus, the Far East, and in the future — and in Central Asia. As we know from the works of the classics of the art of war: a war which is on two and more fronts, no country in the world has not yet won.

In August 1939 preventing the far Eastern TMO was one of the main tasks: in those same days, when Ribbentrop was in Moscow, turned the battle with the Japanese militarists in Mongolian on the river Khalkhin-Gol. Lesson inflicted on the Tokyo militarists, was so impressive that Japan subsequently did not dare to attack the USSR.

So at least on time to protect itself from the West, the Soviet Union was not required to give Germany to negotiate with England and France concerning Poland and the Baltics, and an important trump card here could be the poverty of the Third Reich a range of strategic resources, such as oil, food, non-ferrous metals. Logic is: we offer the German side of the supply which is under embargo from third countries of goods in which it sorely needs, but please accept our plan of dividing Eastern Europe into spheres of influence, and wish to get about what owned Russia in 1913. Hitler realizes that stingy England hardly inferior to the former African colonies or will tear off for them last skin, and then the USSR offers a mutually beneficial trade the same, but for some territorial gains. Important for Germany is the fact that Moscow won’t be joining London and Paris if they would stand up for Poland. As for allies that for Berlin they are change material: you can donate allied Finland and sympathetic the Baltic States which should be included in the sphere of interests of the USSR, and Romania with its oil — generally pushed around as your heart desires. About the return of Bessarabia and Bukovina in late June 1940 is known to all, but few people know that two months later the Second Vienna arbitration decides on the exclusion from Romania several Transylvanian counties in favor of Hungary: for “great-grandchildren of Trajan” there is no more terrible slaps than this. For every Romanian knows, praised the Patriotic lyrics to the triune formula of the Fatherland: “Moldova, Muntenia, Ardal!”, I mean Moldavia, Wallachia and Transylvania. But even it is not the final of the story: the accompaniment of arbitration of the Bulgarian government sends in Bucharest the ultimatum with the requirement to give southern Dobrudja, and after urgent tips of Duce, supported Sofia, Romanian guide hanging the white flag.

As we can see meanness and betrayal in European policy circles in those years were the norm of the relationship. Warsaw betrayed Prague and then six months later it went for devouring. England and France traded the freedom of the Czechoslovak nation on false assurances possessed Fuhrer and in a couple of years they subjected to German aggression themselves. Romania and Finland in 1944, in retaliation for the humiliation, took the side of anti-Hitler coalition.

Note that at the conclusion of the Molotov — Ribbentrop Pact, Germany has betrayed many of its satellites, while the USSR did not betray anyone! We are left with the Czechoslovak people, doing everything we can: the Anschluss the Czech Republic and Bratislava puppet of Joseph Tiso in Moscow were not recognized. If the Soviet Union sacrificed the interests of Poland, the Baltic States and Finland, we had every right to be: well, what should I do with neighbors that are configured completely unfriendly, constantly intrigues and all time are ready to go in the service of a strong adversary?

The Soviet-German Pact is well highlighted the double standards of the Europeans. Do you play against the USSR? All means are good! Lost? Immediately hysterical screams heard that to win against a superior race, it turns out, not fair! Remember how angry Churchill gnashed his teeth on the occasion of the signing of the contract: plans to enter the war with the hated Soviets after they had exhausted Hitler collapsed! Moreover, now they have to fight with someone whom for so many years nurtured: it’s a shame when your weapons are launched against you!

Today the heirs of the Munich conspiracy and Vienna “arbitrators” are so angry vainly trying by all means to erase the memory of indiscretions ancestors. But they won’t succeed: we have paid a heavy price for our truth and it is not subject to revision!

Alexander DMITRIEVSKIY

The day will come when the building of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine will be turned into a Museum. And above the entrance is well carved in stone saying by Vasily Osipovich Klyuchevsky: “History teaches nothing, only punishes ignorance of the lessons.” He is also credited for the phrase “History only teaches us that it teaches nothing”. It is also a good illustration. Well, in fact, would be people go to Maidan if they didn’t have the illusion that it is they, it is here and now for the first time doing unprecedented things? Would Yarosh, for example, take responsibility for all the excesses of the “Right sector” if he treated seriously the phrase “the Revolution devours its children”?

Souvenir prison

The author of the aphorism about bloodthirsty revolution, the Jacobin Georges Jacques Danton spoke it directly on the way to the guillotine. Also it is instructive fact and it just left without attention, though in all textbooks and reference books they were written about it. But, apparently, this time is so; it is not fashionable to read. Remembering the faces of my students while exploring themes of revolution which is called “the French” I can state that it left them disinterested. Comrades in stockings and wigs seemed to them useless past. Meanwhile, the experience of “friends” has since repeated many times, about this all it is interesting: what future can see at least Yatsenyuk? After all, the obvious parallel between the current Ukrainian “freedom fighters” and the French Girondins, overthrew the king, is noticeable and thereafter they were destroyed in an inter-party struggle. In general, “the French revolution” is perhaps the best visual aid for the simulation of all social conflicts that have arisen in modern and contemporary times. Differs may be only in the timing, specific details associated with the specificity of time and place of the event. But general dynamics is always the same. Let’s see: the reason for the outbreak of unrest in France was the economic crisis. Or rather not even a crisis and claims on the part of the French elite to the king. Now these things would be called “corruption”. And, of course, they would come out to the Maidan. By the way the French did so. One of the main symbols of the “great revolution” is the storming of the Bastille the place of confinement of state prisoners. It is so that this construction had a direct connection with the “bloody regime”, it was its symbol. The same awe activists last year’s “Maidan” should probably raise events associated with the “storm” of the President’s administration (remember the footage with the tractor going to “Berkut”?). Now, in the heat of the assault, few people noticed that the prisoners of the then “bloody regime” were less than ten. Two of them were mad, four sat for fake bills. There was still a “prisoner of conscience”, who was arrested for sexual crimes. But during the storm people were killed far more; different sources give from 30 to 100 people dead. The head of the commandant of the Bastille impaled on a spike and wore it all over Paris to mark the overthrow of the “despotic regime”. We conclude that the symbolism, an element of theatricality in any revolution is the paramount thing and an extremely important one. You cannot be without it. However, such pathos always quickly disappears. But the hangover remains for a long time. Jail which is symbolizing tyranny, it was decided to dismantle. There was even a fashion: from the bricks of the Bastille made small models of the fortress and sold as Souvenirs. As if they subconsciously stress that all of this is not fully present only the game. Games are different: for example, ISIS arranges performances by beheadings or burning “infidels”. It is also the creation of the symbol. You could even say direction.

How the flywheel does

In principle, a mechanism called “revolution” is always running about the same. First of all, you create the soil, putting certain thoughts, concepts, proceeding from which, at first, “theoretically”, it turns out that you can do more than what was allowed before. . And — voila: an absolute monarchy turns into a constitutional, and a little later the former king already can be decapitate by you. In France, this work was carried out by enlightenment figures. Voltaire and Montesquieu wrote works about “enlightened monarchy”, this, existing, not criticizing, but if it had been “enlightened”… Diderot creates an encyclopedia, which states that lightning is simply an electrical discharge, and not the wrath of God. It means that the God is in question. And hence the power of the monarch is not from the Lord. And Diderot wrote fiction at leisure. For example, about the nun in the monastery which was not on her own there and contains in fact as in prison? Rousseau was right without any equivocation offered new “untested” ideas. So, the concept of the social contract in fact still lies at the basis of Western society. What it was possible to “negotiate” we can see with our own eyes. In France itself the conservative part of society just cries out from the “universal values”. But their roots back to that era, in which in place of the Bastille wrote “dance here”. However, the same enlightenment figures remain classics, indisputable authority still.

The modern Ukrainian nationalism also has its own soil, and it was created so long since the nineteenth century. And in the end it turned out that in Odessa they burned not the Russian people, “females of Colorado”, in Donbas there live alone bandits, and contrary to this: “we are not cattle”. It explains and justifies everything. But how long for? How many representatives of the French elite, inspired by the “educators” regretted their historic selection as a result?

Now, after creating “fertile ground” the occasion is modeled. In recent times they are boring and monotonous, usually based on the economy, rather than on who and what received less from “mode”. The French king also brought together the elite in order to discuss the tax increase. Was it right? It’s hardly. But the result of the protest exceeded all expectations. Similarly modern Ukrainians probably have not once regretted exile “bloody Yanukovych”. But everything is already irreversible. And then the real fun begins: the visible part of the revolution. And it also has two established process that go after each other. This mechanism is almost never crashes. Firstly in order not to shock the “masses”, the power overthrew the moderate opposition. We have seen different options: from completely secular liberals of 1917 to the Muslim opposition in Egypt. Then it is replaced by the more radical party. And it will fulfill all laid in the revolution tasks. So in France the Jacobins overthrew the Girondins and put them under the knife of the guillotine. And if “moderate” Girondins changed only system of weights and measures, the Jacobins had started in on the calendar. And in addition they put on the verge of a ban the Catholic Church and introduced the “Cult of reason”. And of course, they began to destroy each other. Almost without exception, all “children” of the revolution were eaten by their mother. Probably Francisco Goya felt these currents, he who lived in the “revolutionary” period. He felt it and reflected in the form of a creepy painting “Saturn devouring his son”.

And finally the natural ending will be: any revolution always ends in “Thermidor” is the elimination of tiresome radicals. Usually they repeat the same path on which they sent their opponents, I mean to physically destroy. After eating their fill of the revolution, the French applauded Napoleon and his Empire. Running away from Russia Trotsky (he was as Robespierre) rebuked Stalin in “Thermidor”. And it’s fair and thank God that Stalin was in his place. The Egyptians with a sigh of relief escaped from the “Muslim brotherhood”. And only
Ukrainians still think that the patterns of development of the revolutionary genre will not affect them. Although the process has obviously gone.
What will the future bring?

In modern Ukrainian scheme, everything is pretty clear: “moderate” part of the junta would be eliminated. What would be the reason for this, as will be the force that it will make and in what time frame it will happen: until it is the question. But the algorithm can be confident on 99%.

“It seemed that our country, the Soviet Union, fell once and for all. It was a terrible blow; it was depression; such a large number of spiritual losses suffered by our people. But there was unpredictable thing. What the enemy did not expect – the Russian state began to revive.”
© Speech of Alexander

Another important point: when the time is right to return to the model of a strong government, as always, it will be that in Ukraine such ones there are not. And once again it will fall into the hands of Russia exhausted from ‘independence’. It will be with all their troubles and their newly gained problems, with war, it is likely. Maybe it will fall not in one piece, but in parts, but it has happened.

This material is deliberately not a single line about the Freemasons, conspiracies and other things behind the scenes. Not because the author is not familiar with conspiracy calculations, on the contrary. Just since we’re talking about the patterns, here’s one for starters: through all the intrigues and conspiracies (like a betrayal of 1991, at least) Russia has always held a stronger and appeared on the international scene updated, a worthy country. So it will be this time. Here is not France for you. All of it will be Russia.

Artem OLHIN

The American dream is a beautiful picture of the budget blockbusters, colorful comics and magazines. Since perestroika, the mass media feed us this dream, actively imposing an American view of the world. We are told that Americans live better than we do that they are highly successful throughout the nation that the level of life there is better and more opportunities. Here is a harsh reality and a serious struggle for survival, there is a fairy tale of unlimited freedom and the many side benefits. For many people, this statement has become an axiom. They dream of or to immigrate to the U.S. or, even worse, to recreate America here.

The U.S. citizen of Serbian origin Zack Novak also long believed in the American dream, supporting all the steps of the government. However, as the years passed, and there was growing doubt, and with it the understanding that America is something wrong. Trying to understand the situation on his own, Zack read a variety of literature, analyzed the information obtained from the media, talked with representatives of opposition organizations. When American bombs fell on the land of Serbia, the country of origin of his family, Zach finally realized that the U.S. government, which he sincerely believed, actually is a gang of murderers. When the Pro-American junta waged war on Donbass, Zach Novak realized that he can no longer remain aloof. Throwing everything he had in the States, Zack as a volunteer came to DPR. Moreover, he said America “goodbye” and never intends to go back there.

— Zach, tell us a little about yourself.

I have lived in America all my life. Born in New Jersey and then moved to New York. I worked for the government in the airport “La Guardia”. I had the responsible position of inspector. Together with colleagues I did a full inspection of the airport and surrounding areas. We watched the security. We stopped cars moving to the aircraft fuel and food, reviewed all the documents, looked to see if there weapons and explosives. Also checked the staff watched the recordings from surveillance cameras. Also in conjunction with the police we would have to care about people, looking for terrorists and saboteurs. I worked the night shift. You know, not everyone likes to work at night, but I liked it. We had a great, close-knit team. I’ve been in this job I have met many interesting people who later became my good friends. We often had to work outside in the rain or snow. But when friends are close, difficulties do not notice. All accompanied by jokes and interesting conversations. In General, it was fun.

— You were lucky to work. But many people in the US live and work in poor conditions. Some even are forced to live in vans instead of houses or individual apartments.

Yes, it’s true. The fact is that the middle class in America is almost completely gone. Today’s society there is divided into rich and poor. Moreover, it happened not so long ago. When my parents came to America it still existed. Many people then could be described as middle class. Today it is not. Many are forced to work not one but two or even three jobs and not for eight hours but for twelve. Yes, I liked my job. Good conditions, great team. However, I also worked for twelve hours, then came home, slept off and on again to work. On working days I have not seen with any friends or relatives. And entertainment and personal life could afford only on weekends. To work twelve hours to survive, it is not the “American dream”, it is slavery.

— Tell me, have you believed in the “American dream”?

I used to be a patriot of America. I was radical patriot fanatic, the star-spangled from head to toe. Especially it was during the presidency of Reagan. I fully trust the government and approve of everything his actions. When America under senior Bush bombed Iraq, I also shouted: “Right! So be it!”. I sincerely loved my country and
believed that all the wars waged by us, are conducted solely for good purposes. Of course, I did not know, did not understand much.
— When did you know that you live not in the fairy tale?
Later when I cooled down and grown up, I began to realize that American reality differs from the ideal model in which I believed in my youth. I analyzed events, communicated with representatives of various opposition organizations, tried to find out the truth about what America is really about. What did I see? I see dirty politics, terror, fascism, and genocide! I finally opened my eyes. But I couldn’t believe in all this. And then America attacked Serbia – the country of origin of my parents. Then I realized that the main enemy is the American government. It is from it that the real threat is. I don’t think America is evil itself. It is a beautiful country, with beautiful scenery and there the most wonderful, kind people live in. Only now dangerous, ruthless killers govern it . For example, today the Obama administration systematically exterminates blacks.

— Obama destroys blacks? Sounds like a paradox…

Yes. But as strange as it sounds, Obama really does it. He himself is African American, but it does not prevent him to kill the brothers. They are killed by the police, Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis. The government does not prevent it, but rather contributes. Policemen who killed blacks, most of them go unpunished: they even work with not firing, not to mention how to put someone in jail. Many African Americans oppose Obama because blacks in America have long since been disturbed. Fearing for their lives, they arm, in turn, kill police officers and thereby only exacerbate the conflict. This is of course Obama’s arm. And if you think about it in this situation there is nothing paradoxical – all is quite understandable. The U.S. has a long brewing revolution. Obama is doing everything possible to avoid it. It operates on the principle of “divide and conquer”. He is trying to divide American society, to bring people in interracial and interethnic conflicts. After all, if the people of America, leaving aside all the controversy, will unite around a common idea, the Obama regime will fall.

— How many in the US neo-Nazi organizations and groups are?

There is a huge amount. The largest of these organizations is called the NSM (National Socialist Movement, “the National Socialist Movement”). This organization is a network of offices around the world. They organize large-scale marches in Nazi uniforms with swastikas on the flags. They sigua, chanting “Heil Hitler”. They call to destroy the “color”. And the police does not stop them, because this is “freedom of speech and expression”. This is Obama’s “democracy”. In Russia there is a law prohibiting such organizations. There the police are fighting them. In the Novorossia marching through the streets of neo-Nazis at all hard to imagine. And this is amazing. I believe that there is true freedom. Here is the truth and justice. There’s no hatred here. The inhabitants of Novorossia are shooting by Kiev junta, with the support of America and Germany. Projectiles and bombs are flying to them. And while they are not angry and do not let the hatred in their hearts. This is why I love this land and these people.

— On your jacket there is patch with the inscription “S. H. A. R. P.” What does it mean?

I was in the anti-fascist movement called “S. H. A. R. P.”. This Association of skinheads who are oppose racial prejudice. We still popularly referred to as “Pei”. “Shar” oppose Nazism and racism in all its manifestations. However, we are neither the right nor the left. We were caught on the streets guys with Nazi paraphernalia and beat them. We defended our black brothers from various racist and neo-Nazi groups. We exposed government officials, practicing a fascist ideology. “Shar”, of course, there are sometimes very hard, but with the Nazis, as for me, so be it. I have no regrets about that
I was in this movement, and I proud of it.

— Are there neo-Nazis in the ranks of American police?

Of course are. And there is very much. The movement “S. H. A. R. P.” even conducted its investigation with the aim to identify them. We followed them, had hacked into their accounts in the social networks and mailboxes. As a result there was a collection of very interesting photos. On these photos are the police and the authorities on the beaches or picnics without clothing. There are well visible tattoos with Nazi swastikas and the words “Heil Hitler”. These are the same police who, with impunity, shoot people with a different skin color; these are the same politicians who pass laws allowing police to kill. They stand for the purity of the white race just like the Nazis of Hitler’s Germany or as “Right sector”.

— That is, American police are not protectors but murderers in uniform. It’s the real Nazis. And have you had a negative experience with the police?

When I was driving, I was stopped by a patrol car. I was ordered to get out. And in my hand there was a cell phone. They shouted, “Drop the weapon!” and pointed guns at me. One wrong move and I would be with you now not talking. Many people in America police killed only because took cell phone for a weapon. I don’t know who and how a technique today trains American police officers, but they have made real killers-psychopaths. Previously, they never were such ones. But if they are using a gun, they tried to shoot at the legs. Today they shoot to the head. And they can shoot not only because of the cell phone, but absolutely because of any object in your hand. A spoon may be a knife, a cup is a grenade, and you fall with a bullet in his head. And well even if with one only. You can release twenty bullets, fifty bullets, a hundred bullets. That’s why do they do it? It is inexplicable. To disarm the offender it is rather one best shot enough. But why do ten police officers shoot to a man from different angles, wasting him on the cage? This is crazy, this is such crazy! So, again, I don’t know who coached them, but they become very dangerous. Even their appearance now is frightening. After all, they are walking often not in uniform but in armor, as in some kind of dystopia. It is as in Orwell’s novel “1984”.

– Now that the conversation went about the dystopia, tell me, can a man in America be arrested for his political beliefs?

Of course, I know many such cases. One of my friends argued for the freedom of Palestine, he were leaflets, held protests against the aggressive policy of Israel. So one day his door knocked the FBI and took him for questioning. For what? Just because he advocated the freedom of Palestine? If you do not agree with government policy and actively declare it, you immediately take under observation: they are watching you, listening on the phone, reading email. When I with my friends went to protest, then I saw us off from all sides by dozens of cameras, fix our faces. Their favorite technique is to shoot the faces of the leaders, to establish their identity, and then to throw in the car, bag or flat explosive device. And now you are from the opposition turn into a dangerous terrorist. You will need a very good lawyer to prove the opposite. And it is not certain that he will be succeeded.

— How did your friends react when you learned that you’re going to go to Novorossia and to join the ranks of volunteers?

About my intention, I told only two best friends. Because that I was absolutely sure they. I just was afraid that this information will get into the FBI and I get held up at the airport. Friends have supported me. Then, found out about it many, and the reaction was very different. Some people tell me: “Zach, why are you doing it? Come home.” I tell them: “No. My home is here”.

— So don’t you intend to return to America?

In the near future – no. Coming here, I sacrificed a lot. I left in America, a job, a home, a car, friends and
relatives eventually. But I’m proud of that I made that decision and do everything in my power to help the people of Novorossia. I am angry at the American government for many reasons. But most importantly is that I can’t forgive them for Serbia and I will never forgive them Donbass. I’m going to live here, to do everything to ensure that the new Russia finally gained its independence, and I want to become a citizen of this new country, which I loved with all my heart.

talked
Gennady Zilyakov